Search

Purpose: Etoposide to standard R‐CHOP is used for high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in some countries. Due to the lack of randomized trials, a real‐world data study using matching methods was used to test the potential effectiveness of R‐CHOEP over R‐CHOP. Patients and Methods: This study included patients from the Danish Lymphoma Register diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 at the age of 18–60 years with de novo DLBCL and age‐adjusted IPI ≥2. R‐CHOEP treated patients were matched 1:1 without replacement to R‐CHOP treated patients using a hybrid exact and genetic matching technique. Primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 396 patients were included; 213 received R‐CHOEP and 183 received R‐CHOP. Unadjusted 5‐year PFS and OS for R‐CHOEP were 69% (95% Confidence intervals [CI]; 63%–76%) and 79% (CI;73%–85%) versus 62% (CI;55%–70%) and 76% (CI;69%–82%) for R‐CHOP (log‐rank test, PFS p =.25 and OS p =.31). A total of 127 patients treated with R‐CHOEP were matched to 127 patients treated with R‐CHOP. Matching‐adjusted 5‐year PFS and OS were 65% (CI; 57%–74%) and 79% (CI; 72%–84%) for R‐CHOEP versus 63% (CI; 55%–73%) and 79% (CI;72%–87%) for R‐CHOP (log‐rank test, PFS p =.90 and OS p =.63). Conclusion: The present study did not confirm superiority of R‐CHOEP over R‐CHOP for young patients with high‐risk DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Objectives Methods Results Conclusion Recent front‐line clinical trials used the International Prognostic Index (IPI) to identify trial‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, many IPI‐like variants with improved accuracy have been developed over the years for rituximab‐treated patients.We assessed the impact of International Prognostic Indices on patient enrolment in clinical trials, aiming to exclude low‐risk IPI patients based on POLARIX/EPCORE DLBCL‐2 trial criteria.We identified 2877 patients in the Danish Lymphoma Registry who would have been eligible for the POLARIX trial if patients with IPI 0–1 scores were included. IPI and NCCN‐IPI assigned 33.3% and 11.9% of patients to the low‐risk group, respectively. Shorter 5‐year overall survival (91.4% vs. 97.5%), higher relapse rate (9.9% vs. 4.4%), and more deaths (16.1% vs. 4.4%) occurred in the low‐risk IPI group compared with low‐risk NCCN‐IPI group. Analyzed models failed to identify true high‐risk patients with poor prognosis. Similar results were found in the confirmatory cohort developed based on EPCORE DLBCL‐2 trial eligibility criteria.True low‐risk patients are more optimal identified by NCCN‐IPI and should be excluded from front‐line clinical trials due to their excellent prognosis. However, additional high‐risk factors besides clinical prognostic models need to be considered when selecting trial‐eligible patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patients with haematological disorders may be particularly vulnerable to respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, this is unknown., Methods: We conducted a prospective, nationwide study including 66 patients in follow-up at Danish haematology departments with a malignant or non-malignant haematological disorder and with verified SARS-CoV-2 infection. Outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and one-month survival rate., Results: Mean age was 66.7 years, 60.6% were males, 90.9% had comorbidity, and 13.6% had a BMI ≥ 30. The most frequent diagnoses were chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/lymphoma (47.0%), multiple myeloma (16.7%) and acute leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AL/MDS) (12.1%). Treatment for the haematological disease was ongoing in 59.1% of cases. Neutropenia was present in 6.5%, lymphopenia in 46.6% and hypogammaglobulinaemia in 26.3%. The SARS-CoV-2 infection was mild in 50.0%, severe in 36.4% and critical in 13.6%. After one month, 21.2% had been admitted to ICU, and 24.2% died. Mortality was highest in older patients, patients with severe/critical SARS-CoV-2 infection, high comorbidity score or high performance status score, purine analogue treatment and with AL/MDS. Although older patients and patients with comorbidities had the highest mortality rates, mortality was considerable among all haematological patients., Conclusion: Haematological patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has a severe clinical course., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)