Search

Objective: Adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) need recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement to restore body composition, structure functions and metabolic abnormalities. The optimal rhGH dose for replacement has been progressively reduced to avoid side effects. The aim of the present study was to define the minimal rhGH dose able to increase both IGF-I and IGF binding protein (BP)-3 levels in GHD and to verify the possible change in GH sensitivity., Design and Patients: To this goal, we studied the effect of 4-day treatment with 3 rhGH doses (1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg/day) on IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in 25 panhypopituitary adults with severe GHD (12 males and 13 females, age: 44.5+/-3.0 years, body mass index (BMI): 27.0+/-0.9 kg/m(2)) and 21 normal young adult volunteers (NV, 12 males and 9 females, age: 30.5+/-2.0 years, BMI: 20.8+/-0.5 kg/m(2))., Results: Basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD were lower (P<0.001) than in NV. In NV the 1.25 microg/kg dose of rhGH did not modify IGF-I levels. The dose of 2.5 microg/kg rhGH significantly increased IGF-I levels in men (P<0.001) but not in women, while the 5.0 microg/kg dose increased IGF-I levels in both sexes (P<0.001). IGFBP-3 levels were not modified by any of the administered rhGH doses. In GHD patients, all rhGH doses increased IGF-I levels 12 h after both the first (P<0.01) and the fourth rhGH dose (P<0.001). At the end of treatment percentage increases in IGF-I were higher (P<0.001) in GHD patients than in NV. In contrast with NV, in GHD patients the IGF-I response to short-term stimulation with rhGH was independent of gender. Moreover, GHD patients showed increases in IGFBP-3 after the fourth administration of both 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg rhGH., Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that the minimal rhGH dose able to increase IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD patients is lower than in normal subjects, at least after a very short treatment. This evidence suggests an enhanced peripheral GH sensitivity in GH deprivation.

Objective: Glucagon administration stimulates both somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans, although this happens only if glucagon is administered by the intramuscular route and not by the intravenous route. On the other hand, GH secretagogues (GHS) strongly stimulate GH and also possess ACTH-releasing activity., Design and Methods: To clarify the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effects of both glucagon and GHS on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion, we studied the GH, ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon (GLU, 0.017 mg/kg i.m.) and Hexarelin, a peptidyl GHS (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg i.v.) given alone or in combination in 6 normal young volunteers (females, aged 26-32 years, body mass index 19.7-22.5 kg/m)., Results: GLU administration elicited a clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-S.E.M.: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3. 3+/-0.7 microg/l, P<0.02), ACTH (11.6+/-3.3 vs 4.1+/-0.3 pmol/l, P<0. 02) and cortisol (613.5+/-65.6 vs 436.9+/-19.3 nmol/l, P<0.05) levels. HEX induced a marked increase in GH levels (55.7+/-19.8 vs 3. 7+/-1.9 microg/l, P<0.005) and also significant ACTH (5.7+/-1.1 vs 3. 4+/-0.6 pmol/l, P<0.01) and cortisol (400.2+/-31.4 vs 363.4+/-32.2 nmol/l, P<0.05) responses. The GH area under the curve (AUC) after HEX was clearly higher than after GLU (1637.3+/-494.0 vs 479.1+/-115. 7 microg/l/120 min, P<0.04) while HEX and GLU coadministration had a true synergistic effect on GH release (3243.8+/-687.5 microg/l/120 min, P<0.02). The ACTH and cortisol AUCs after HEX were lower (P<0. 02) than those after GLU (208.3+/-41.3 vs 426.3+/-80.9 pmol/l/120 min and 18 874.5+/-1626.1 vs 28 338.5+/-2430.7 nmol/l/120 min respectively). The combined administration of HEX and GLU had an effect which was less than additive on both ACTH (564.02+/-76.5 pmol/l/120 min) and cortisol (35 424.6+/-5548.1 nmol/l/120 min) secretion., Conclusions: These results show that the intramuscular administration of glucagon releases less GH but more ACTH and cortisol than Hexarelin. The combined administration of glucagon and Hexarelin has a true synergistic effect on somatotroph secretion but a less than additive effect on corticotroph secretion; these findings suggest that these stimuli act via different mechanisms to stimulate somatotrophs while they could have a common action on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Objective: It is known that glucagon administration elicits ACTH and cortisol responses in humans, although this effect takes place after intramuscular or subcutaneous but not after the intravenous route of administration. The mechanisms underlying this stimulatory effect on corticotroph secretion are unknown but they are unrelated to glucose variations and stress-mediated actions., Design and Methods: To throw further light on the stimulatory effect of i.m. glucagon on the pituitary-adrenal axis, using six normal young female volunteers (26-32 years, body mass index 19.7-22.5 kg/m(2)) we studied the interaction between glucagon (GLU; 0.017 mg/kg i.m.) and human corticotropin-releasing hormone (hCRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v.) or vasopressin (AVP; 0.17 U/kg i.m.). The interactions between hCRH and AVP on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the GH response to GLU alone or combined with hCRH or AVP were also studied., Results: GLU i.m. administration elicited a clear increase in ACTH (peak vs baseline, means+/-s.e.m.: 11.6+/-3.3 vs 4.2+/-0.3 pmol/l, P<0.05), cortisol (613.5+/-65.6 vs 436.9+/-19.3 nmol/l, P<0.05) and GH levels (11.6+/-3.4 vs 3.3+/-0.7 microg/l, P<0.05). The ACTH response to GLU (area under the curve: 426.4+/-80.9 pmol/l per 120 min) was higher than that to AVP (206.3+/-38.8 pmol/l per 120 min, P<0.02) and that to hCRH (299.8+/-39.8 pmol/l per 120 min) although this latter difference did not attain statistical significance. The GLU-induced cortisol response (28336.9+/-2430.7 nmol/l per 120 min) was similar to those after hCRH (24099.2+/-2075.2 nmol/l per 120 min) and AVP (21808.7+/-1948.2 nmol/l per 120 min). GLU and hCRH had an additive effect on ACTH (964.9+/-106.6 pmol/l per 120 min, P<0.02) and a less than additive effect on cortisol levels (35542.5+/-2720. 2 nmol/l per 120 min). Similarly, GLU and AVP had an additive effect on ACTH (825.6+/-139.6 pmol/l per 120 min, P<0.02) and an effect less than additive on cortisol levels (33059.2+/-1965.3 nmol/l per 120 min). The effects of GLU co-administered with hCRH or AVP were similar to those of the combined administration of hCRH and AVP on ACTH (906. 0+/-152.7 pmol/l per 120 min) and cortisol (34383.5+/-1669.2 nmol/l per 120min) levels. The GH response to GLU was not modified by hCRH or AVP., Conclusions: These results show that i.m. glucagon administration is a provocative stimulus of ACTH and cortisol secretion, at least as potent as hCRH and AVP. The ACTH-releasing effect of i.m. glucagon is not mediated by selective CRH or AVP stimulation but the possibility that both neurohormones play a role could be hypothesized.

Classical provocative stimuli of GH secretion such as insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, arginine, clonidine, glucagon and levodopa have been widely used in clinical practice for approximately 30 years. On the other hand, in the last 10 years new potent stimuli of GH secretion have been proposed, but an extensive comparison with the classical ones has rarely been performed, at least in adults. In order to compare the GH-releasing activity of old and new provocative stimuli of GH secretion, and to define the normative values of the GH response, in 178 normal adults (95 males, 83 females; age range: 20-50 years, all within +/-15% of their ideal body weight), we studied the GH response to: insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1IU/kg i.v.), arginine (ARG, 0.5g/kg i.v.), clonidine (CLO, 300 microg/kg p.o.), glucagon (GLU, 1mg i.m.), pyridostigmine (PD, 120mg p.o.), galanin (GAL, 80pmol/kg per min), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 1 microg/kg i.v.), GHRH+ARG, GHRH+PD, hexarelin, a GH-releasing protein (HEX, 2 microg/kg i.v.) and GHRH+HEX (0.25 microg/kg i.v.). The mean (+/-s.e.m.) peak GH response to ITT (21.8+/-2.8, range: 3.0-84.0 microg/l) was similar to those to ARG (18.0+/-1.6, range: 2.9-39.5 microg/l) or GLU (20. 5+/-2.2, range: 10.6-36.9 microg/l) which, in turn, were higher (P<0. 001) than those to CLO (8.2+/-1.6, range: 0.3-21.5 microg/l), PD (9. 6+/-1.1, range: 2.2-33.0 microg/l) and GAL (9.3+/-1.1, range: 3.9-18. 3 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH (19.1+/-1.5, range: 2.7-55.0 microg/l) was similar to those after ITT, ARG or GLU but clearly lower than those after GHRH+ARG (65.9+/-5.5, range: 13.8-171.0 microg/l) and GHRH+PD (50.2+/-4.6, range: 17.7-134.5 microg/l) which, in turn, were similar. The GH response to HEX (55.3+/-5.5, range: 13.9-163.5 microg/l) was similar to those after GHRH+ARG and GHRH+PD but lower (P<0.001) than that after GHRH+HEX (86.0+/-4.3, range: 49. 0-125.0 microg/l) which was the most potent stimulus of GH secretion. In this adult population the third centile limits of peak GH response to various stimuli were the following: ITT: 5.3; ARG: 2.9; CLO: 1.5; GLU: 7.6; PD: 2.2; GAL: 4.0; GHRH: 5.0; GHRH+ARG: 17.8; GHRH+PD: 17.9; HEX: 21.6; GHRH+HEX: 57.1. These results confirm that, among classical provocative tests of GH secretion, ITT followed by ARG and GLU are the most potent ones and possess clear limits of normality. GHRH+ARG or PD and HEX are strong stimuli of GH secretion which, however, is maximally stimulated by a combination of GHRH and a low dose of HEX. It is recommended that each test is used with appropriate cut-off limits.

Hexarelin (HEX), a synthetic hexapeptide, has a strong and reproducible GH-releasing activity in man after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and oral administration. Its effect undergoes age-related variations, being reduced in elderly subjects. In spite of evidence in animals showing that the activity of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) is positively influenced by oestrogens, in young adults no sex-related difference has been found in the GH response to HEX or to other GHRPs. We aimed to clarify the influence of the menopause and oestrogens on the GH-releasing activity of HEX. We studied the GH response to the acute administration of the maximal effective dose of HEX (2 micrograms/kg i.v.) in 24 young women (YW, age: 27.3 +/- 0.5 years: body mass index (BMI): 20.7 +/- 0.3 kg/m2), 14 post-menopausal women (PW, age: 52.9 +/- 1.2 years: BMI: 23.2 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) and 14 aged women (AW, age: 68.9 +/- 1.5 years: BMI: 21.7 +/- 0.7 kg/m2). In 10 post-menopausal women the GH response to HEX was also studied after 3 months of transdermal oestradiol treatment (delivery 50 micrograms/die). Basal oestrogen and GH levels in PW were lower than those in YW (oestrogen: 4.8 +/- 3.6 vs 42.0 +/- 3.4 pg/ml (means +/- S.E.M.). P < 0.001: GH: 1.5 +/- 0.5 vs 2.9 +/- 0.6 micrograms/l, P < 0.02) and similar to those in AW (oestrogen: 1.3 +/- 0.4 pg/ml: GH: 0.9 +/- 0.2 microgram/l). IGF-l levels in PW were not different from those in YW (174.4 +/- 11.9 vs 195.5 +/- 14.9 micrograms/l) and higher than those in AW (109.8 +/- 15.8 micrograms/l, P < 0.01). The GH response to HEX in PW (areas under the curve +/- S.E.M.: 453.6 +/- 56.0 micrograms.min/l) was lower (P < 0.002) than that in YW (1630.4 +/- 259.7 micrograms.min/l) while it did not differ from that in AW (781.8 +/- 189.3 micrograms.min/l). In PW 3-month oestrogen administration increased oestradiol levels (38.3 +/- 5.9 vs 0.8 +/- 0.4 pg/ml, P < 0.001) making them similar to those recorded in YW, while it failed to modify both basal GH and IGF-l levels GH: 1.8 +/- 0.6 vs 1.5 +/- 0.7 micrograms/l: IGF-l: 164.6 +/- 14.3 vs 175.0 +/- 12.3 micrograms/l). Also the GH response to HEX was not modified by oestradiol treatment (518.4 +/- 125.6 vs 425.4 +/- 69.3 micrograms.min/l). In conclusion, present data confirm the strong GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin in humans and demonstrate that its activity is already reduced in post-menopausal women to an extent overlapping that in elderly women. Moreover, oestrogen treatment is not able to restore it. Thus, the lack of oestrogens does not seem to account for the reduced somatotraph responsiveness to GHRPs in the post-menopausal period.

Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic, non-natural peptides endowed with potent stimulatory effects on somatotrope secretion in animals and humans. They have no structural homology with GHRH and act via specific receptors present either at the pituitary or the hypothalamic level both in animals and in humans. The GHRP receptor has recently been cloned and, interestingly, it does not show sequence homology with other G-protein-coupled receptors known so far. This evidence strongly suggests the existence of a natural GHRP-like ligand which, however, has not yet been found. The mechanisms underlying the GHRP effect are still unclear. At present, several data favor the hypothesis that GHRPs could act by counteracting somatostatinergic activity both at the pituitary and the hypothalamic level and/or, at least partially, via a GHRH-mediated mechanism. However, the possibility that GHRPs act via an unknown hypothalamic factor (U factor) is still open. GHRP-6 was the first hexapeptide to be extensively studied in humans. More recently, a heptapeptide, GHRP-1, and two other hexapeptides, GHRP-2 and Hexarelin, have been synthesized and are now available for human studies. Moreover, non-peptidyl GHRP mimetics have been developed which act via GHRP receptors and their effects have been clearly demonstrated in animals and in humans in vivo. Among non-peptidyl GHRPs, MK-0677 seems the most interesting molecule. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is marked and dose-related after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and even oral administration. The effect of GHRPs is reproducible and undergoes partial desensitization, more during continuous infusion, less during intermittent administration: in fact, prolonged administration of GHRPs increases IGF-1 levels both in animals and in humans. The GH-releasing effect of GHRPs does not depend on sex but undergoes age-related variations. It increases from birth to puberty, persists at a similar level in adulthood and decreases thereafter. By the sixth decade of life, the activity of GHRPs is reduced but it is still marked and higher than that of GHRH. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is synergistic with that of GHRH, is not affected by opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone, and is only blunted by inhibitory influences, including neurotransmitters, glucose, free fatty acids, gluco corticoids, recombinant human GH and even exogenous somatostatin, which are known to almost abolish the effect of GHRH. GHRPs maintain their GH-releasing effect in somatotrope hypersecretory states such as in acromegaly, anorexia nervosa and hyperthyroidism. On the other hand, their good GH-releasing activity has been shown in some but not in other somatotrope hyposecretory states. In fact, reduced GH responses after GHRP administration have been reported in idiopathic GH deficiency as well as in idiopathic short stature, in obesity and in hypothyroidism, while in patients with pituitary stalk disconnection or Cushing's syndrome the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRPs is almost absent. In short children an increase in height velocity has also been reported during chronic GHRP treatment. Thus, based on their marked GH-releasing effect even after oral administration, GHRPs offer their own clinical usefulness for treatment of some GH hyposecretory states.

Both spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion is reduced in obesity, in which state insensitivity to the inhibitory effect of hyperglycemia also has been reported. To further investigate this point, in eight male obese (OB) patients (27-49 years old; body mass index = 39.5 +/- 1.7 kg/m2) we studied the effect of oral glucose load (100 g) on the GH response to Hexarelin (HEX, 2 micrograms/kg iv), a synthetic hexapeptide belonging to the GH-releasing peptide family, which has been reported to be able to induce a marked GH rise even in obese patients. As a control group, six male age-matched normal subjects (NS) were studied (26-35 years old; body mass index = 22.3 +/- 1.5 kg/m2). In all subjects the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH, 1 microgram/kg iv) was also studied. Basal GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels in OB and NS were similar (0.3 +/- 0.1 vs 0.5 +/- 1.0 microgram/l and 166.7 +/- 12.3 vs 145.4 +/- 6.9 micrograms/l, respectively). Hexarelin induced a clear GH rise in OB (peak: 20.0 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l; AUC: 1193.0 +/- 213.7 micrograms.l-1.120 min-1) but this response was clearly lower (p < 0.0002) than that observed in NS (62.6 +/- 7.3 micrograms/l, 4587.5 +/- 614.9 micrograms.l-1.120 min-1). The GHRH-induced GH rise was lower (p < 0.002) in OB (4.4 +/- 1.2 micrograms/l, 331.0 +/- 95.9 micrograms.l-1.120 min-1) than that in NS (20.2 +/- 1.9 micrograms/l, 1281.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms.l-1 .120 min-1) and both were lower (p < 0.05) than those induced by HEX. In NS, glucose significantly blunted the GH response to HEX (38.4 +/- 7.2 micrograms/l, 2236.5 +/- 514.8 micrograms.l-1.120 min-1, p < 0.05) but failed to modify it in OB (19.4 +/- 2.7 micrograms/l, 934.5 +/- 151.3 micrograms.l-1. 120 min-1). Plasma glucose peaks after oral glucose load in OB and NS were similar (164.5 +/- 9.7 vs 145.8 +/- 4.6 mg/dl). In conclusion, the present data demonstrate that, in contrast to normal subjects, in obese patients HEX has a reduced GH-releasing effect that is not inhibited by glucose. In OB patients as well as in normal subjects HEX releases more GH than GHRH. These findings strengthen the evidence that GH secretion in obesity is refractory either to stimulatory inputs or to the inhibitory effect of hyperglycemia.

The reliability and reproducibility of provocative stimuli of growth hormone (GH) secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency are still controversial both in childhood and in adulthood. The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and arginine (ARG), which likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, is one of the most potent stimuli known so far and has been proposed recently as the best test to explore the maximal somatotrope capacity of somatotrope cells. However, it is well known that, usually, provocative stimuli of GH secretion suffer from poor reproducibility and that of the GHRH + ARG test has still to be verified. We aimed to verify the between- and within-subject variability of the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test in normal subjects during their lifespan as well as in hypopituitaric patients with GH deficiency (GHD). In 10 normal children (C: six male and four female, age 12.3 +/- 0.9 years, body mass index (BMI) = 16.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, pubertal stages I-III), 18 normal young adults (Y: ten male and eight female, age 31.1 +/- 1.3 years, BMI = 21.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), 12 normal elderly subjects (E: two male and ten female, age 74.4 +/- 1.8 years, BMI= 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 15 panhypopituitaric GH-deficient patients (GHD: nine male and six female, age 40.9 +/- 4.1 years, BMI= 22.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m2), we studied the inter- and intra-individual variability of the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v.) in two different sessions at least 3 days apart. The GH responses to GHRH + ARG in C (1st vs 2nd session: 61.6 +/- 8.1 vs 66.5 +/- 9.4 microg/l), Y (70.4 +/- 10.1 vs 76.2 10.7 microg/l) and E (57.9 14.8 vs 52.1 +/- 8.0 microg/l) were similar and reproducible in all groups. The somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH + ARG also showed a limited within-subject variability (r = 0.71, 0.90 and 0.89 and p < 0.02, 0.0005 and 0.0005 for C, Y and E, respectively). Similarly in GHD, the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test showed a good inter- (1st vs 2nd session: 2.3 +/- 0.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 microg/l) and intra-individual reproducibility (r = 0.70, p < 0.005). The GHRH + ARG-induced GH responses in GHD were markedly lower (p < 0.0005) than those in age-matched controls and no overlap was found between GH peak responses in GHD and normal subjects. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH + ARG is very marked, independent of age and shows limited inter- and intra-individual variability. The GH response to the GHRH + ARG test is strikingly reduced in panhypopituitaric patients with GHD, in whom the low somatotrope responsiveness is reproducible. Thus, these findings strengthen the hypothesis that GHRH + ARG should be considered the most reliable test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells and to distinguish normal subjects from GHD patients in adulthood.

In adulthood the growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous acute administration of either GH or GHRH and it is restored by substances that inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release. Because in children the GH response to GHRH is not affected by previous neurohormone administration, it has been suggested that in childhood a GH increase is not able to trigger the somatostatin-mediated negative GH autofeedback mechanism. To verify this hypothesis, in 25 children (8 girls and 17 boys; 15 prepubertal and 10 in pubertal stages II-IV) with familial short stature (normal height velocity and insulin-like growth factor I levels) we studied the effect of acute i.v. administration of different recombinant human GH doses (group 1, N = 5, 0.06 U/kg; group 2, N = 6, 0.01 U/kg; group 3, N = 7, 0.005 U/kg at - 150 min) or saline on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min). In another group (N = 7), we studied the effect of 0.005 U/kg iv recombinant human GH or saline on the GH response to GHRH combined with arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v. over 30 min), which likely inhibits hypothalamic somatostatin release. Serum GH increases after recombinant human GH were dose-dependent (GH peak, mean +/- SEM, 171.7 +/- 24.4, 33.3 +/- 3.9 and 21.8 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, respectively). The administration of recombinant human GH strongly inhibited the GHRH-induced GH rise in all groups (group 1, 7.1 +/- 1.7 vs 23.1 +/- 7.6 micrograms/l, p < 0.05; group 2, 9.5 +/- 2.8 vs 26.9 +/- 8.5 micrograms/l, p < 0.05; group 3, 9.1 +/- 2.7 vs 34.8 +/- 7.2 micrograms/l, p < 0.02). The GH response to arginine + GHRH (56.9 +/- 13.3 micrograms/l) was higher than that to GHRH alone recorded in group 1 (p < 0.005), group 2 (p < 0.01) and group 3 (p < 0.01), while exogenous recombinant human GH failed to inhibit it (45.0 +/- 9.4 micrograms/l). Our results demonstrate that in childhood, as well as in adulthood, recombinant human GH administration inhibits the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH. This inhibitory effect is likely to be mediated by hypothalamic somatostatin release.

The function of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor I (GH-IGF-I) axis is reduced in aging, although the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells is preserved. Previous studies have suggested that continuous administration of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) results in homologous desensitization to the GH-releasing effect of the peptides. In the present study we have studied whether healthy elderly subjects would remain responsive to short-term, intermittent treatment with Hexarelin (HEX), a GHRP, and whether this treatment would result in an increase in serum IGF-I. In study I, the effect of an 8-day treatment with intranasal administration of 1.25 mg (about 18 micrograms/kg) t.i.d. HEX on the acute GH response to the hexapeptide and on serum IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), prolactin and cortisol levels was studied in seven elderly subjects (four males and three females, aged 67-80 years). In study II, the same parameters were studied before and after a 15-day treatment with oral administration of 20 mg (about 300 micrograms/kg) t.i.d. HEX in seven elderly women (aged 63-80 years). The GH response to the intranasal HEX administration was not significantly higher than that induced by 1 microgram/kg iv GHRH (229.4 +/- 35.9 vs 145.8 +/- 26.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and was maintained with a trend towards increase after an 8-day treatment with the peptide (342.5 +/- 199.3 micrograms.l-1.h-1). On the other hand, HEX treatment did not significantly modify IGF-I (138.7 +/- 11.1 vs 122.4 +/- 14.1 micrograms/l) but increased IGFBP-3 levels (2.4 +/- 0.2 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2 mg/l, p < 0.02). The GH response to the oral HEX administration was also not significantly higher than that to iv GHRH (257.6 +/- 72.0 vs 179.0 +/- 42.8 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and did not change after a 15-day treatment with the peptide (237.8 +/- 42.8 micrograms.l-1.h-1). Both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were slightly but significantly increased by oral HEX treatment (156.0 +/- 10.7 vs 141.6 +/- 13.6 micrograms/l, p < 0.03, 3.4 +/- 0.2 vs 3.1 +/- 0.2 mg/l, p < 0.03, respectively). Neither intranasal nor oral HEX treatment modified PRL or cortisol levels and did not induce any side effect. In conclusion, these results indicate that chronic but intermittent treatment with HEX, administered either by intranasal or oral route, does not desensitize the GH response to the peptide. Moreover, after HEX treatment a trend towards increase was shown for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. Thus, our findings strengthen the hypothesis that prolonged treatment with HEX may restore the reduced GH release in aging.

In hyperprolactinemic patients an exaggerated glucose-induced insulin secretion has been reported, but these results have not been confirmed by other researchers. On the other hand, there are few data concerning somatotrope secretion in this condition. In order to clarify these points, in seven normal weight hyperprolactinemic female patients (HP: age 18-46 years, body mass index = 21.8 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2), basal prolactin = 91.7 +/- 16.5 micrograms/l) we studied the effects of glucose load (100 g orally) and/or arginine (0.5 g/kg infused over 30 min) on insulin glucose and growth hormone (GH) levels. These results were compared with those obtained in seven patients with simple obesity (OB: age 23-48 years, body mass index = 38.3 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2)) in whom exaggerated insulin and low GH secretion are well known. Seven normal women (NS: age 26-32 years, body mass index = 20.6 +/- 1/9 kg/m(2)) were studied as controls. The insulin response to glucose in HP (area under curve = 11,460.8 +/- 1407.5 mU x min x l(-1)) was not significantly different from NS (7743.7 +/- 882.9 mU x min x l(-1)) and OB (14,504.8 +/- 1659.9 mU x min x l(-1)). The arginine-induced insulin release in HP and OB was similar (4219.4 +/- 631.7 and 4107.3 +/- 643.2 mU x min x l(-1), respectively), both being higher (p < 0.02) than in NS (2178.1 +/- 290.9 mU x min x l(-1). Glucose and arginine had an additive effect on insulin release in HP and NS (19,769.1 +/- 3249.6 and 10,996.6 +/- 1201.0 mU x min 1(-1), respectively) and a synergistic effect in OB (28 117.3 +/- 5224.7 mU x min x l(-1)). In HP the insulin response to the combined administration of glucose and arginine was not significantly different from the one in OB, and both were higher (p < 0.05) than in NS. The increase in glucose levels after glucose administered on its own or combined with arginine was higher (p < 0.02) and longer lasting in OB than in NS and HP. After arginine in OB, the glucose levels did not show the late decrease under baseline values observed in HP and NS. Glucose inhibited GH secretion both in HP and NS (p < 0.05), while arginine stimulated it in all groups, although the GH response in HP and NS was higher (p < 0.03) than in OB. The arginine-induced GH secretion was inhibited by glucose in HP and NS but not in OB. These results demonstrate that both in hyperprolactinemic patients and in obesity there is a clear increase in insulin secretion. The insulin hyperresponsiveness in hyperprolactinemia is more clearly demonstrated by combined stimulation with glucose and arginine. In spite of similar insulin hypersecretion in hyperprolactinemic and obese patients, GH secretion is reduced only in the latter; with these data the hypothesis that somatotrope insufficiency in obesity is due to hyperinsulinism is unlikely.

Pyridostigmine (PD), a muscarinic cholinergic agonist, and arginine (ARG) clearly increase the growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in man. The current study was undertaken to investigate the value and safety of PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests as well as the measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in diagnosing GH deficiency in adults. Fifty-four patients considered GH deficient from extensive organic or idiopathic pituitary disease and 326 healthy adults were studied. The IGF-I concentrations were lower than the 3rd percentile of normal values in only 31 of the 54 (57.4%) patients with hypopituitarism. However, the IGF-I levels in hypopituitary patients and in normal subjects overlapped more frequently between 41 and 60 years (50%) and between 61 and 80 years (92.3%) as opposed to between 20 and 40 years (8.6%). In contrast to the IGF-I measurement, the ranges of peak GH responses to PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests were clearly differentiated between the hypopituitary (0.2-6.8 and 0.1-9.5 microg/l, respectively) and normal (17.7-114 and 16.1-119 microg/l, respectively). However, the PD + GHRH test was reliable only in subjects of 20-40 years of age. In conclusion, IGF-I measurement had no value in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults aged over 40 years, but is reliable enough when young adults of 20-40 years of age are considered. Both PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH testing should be considered more reliable biochemical measurements of GH deficiency. In contrast to the PD + GHRH test, the ARG + GHRH test is reliable throughout the adult lifespan and appears to be the most appropriate for patient compliance and safety.

Galanin enhances both baseline and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion both in animals and in man. Although galanin has a clear influence on the secretion of other anterior pituitary hormones in animals, in man it increases prolactin (PRL) slightly but does not affect spontaneous thyrotropin (TSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) secretion. The aim of our study was to verify the effect of galanin on basal and releasing hormone-stimulated release of gonadotropins, PRL, TSH, ACTH and cortisol secretion. As GH release has been shown to be inhibited by corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), we also studied the effect of CRH on galanin-stimulated GH increase. The effect of porcine galanin (15 micrograms/kg iv infused in 60 min) alone and in combination with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 200 micrograms iv bolus), CRH (100 micrograms iv bolus) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, 100 micrograms iv bolus) on GH, PRL, TSH, ACTH, cortisol, FSH and LH secretion in seven normal young women (aged 25-30 years) was studied. Galanin infusion caused an increase in serum GH levels (p < 0.02) but failed to modify significantly the spontaneous PRL, LH, FSH, TSH, ACTH and cortisol secretion. The combined administration of TRH, GnRH and CRH caused a significant increase in PRL (p < 0.02), LH (p < 0.02), FSH (p < 0.02), TSH (p < 0.02), ACTH (p < 0.02) and cortisol (p < 0.05), but not in GH levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The reduced activity of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis in aging may contribute to changes in body composition. As this GH insufficiency is due to hypothalamic pathogenesis, the availability of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), such as GHRP-6 (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) which is active even after oral administration, might be useful to restore it. The aim of our study was to verify the effectiveness of oral administration of GHRP-6 in normal elderly subjects and to investigate whether its GH-releasing activity is maintained or vanishes after short-term oral treatment. Seven normal elderly women (aged 65-82 years) were studied. The effect of oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 on GH secretion was investigated before and after 4 days of treatment with the hexapeptide given twice daily. The GH response to the maximal effective dose of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) also was studied. Before treatment, oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 elicited a clear GH rise (peak 10.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/l; AUC 353.1 +/- 90.6 micrograms.l-1.h-1), which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that induced by intravenous GHRH (peak 5.1 +/- 1.5 micrograms/l; AUC 106.5 +/- 43.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1). After 4 days of treatment with GHRP-6, the GH response to the hexapeptide was maintained, with a trend towards an increase (peak 16.8 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l; AUC 499.8 +/- 107.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The IGF-I levels were not increased significantly after treatment (77.1 +/- 8.4 vs 84.1 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

It is well known that arginine vasopressin (AVP) exerts a stimulatory effect on adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion. Moreover, there is consistent evidence that the hypothalamic AVP-secreting neurons are involved in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion. With the aim to throw further light on the interaction between AVP and corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion, in this study we compared the ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH (100 micrograms iv as a bolus) in 18 normal subjects (15 females and three males, age 22-35 years) and seven patients with central isolated diabetes insipidus (six females and one male, age 16-40 years). Two patients were newly diagnosed and five had discontinued substitution therapy with desamino-D-AVP 24 h before testing. All had free access to water before and during the test period. The ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH were higher in subjects with diabetes insipidus than in controls, either when evaluated as peak values (ACTH, mean +/- SEM: 17.0 +/- 1.2 vs 7.7 +/- 0.7 pmol/l, p = 0.0003; cortisol: 611.3 +/- 59.4 vs 450.7 +/- 21.2 nmol/l, p = 0.01) or area under curve values (ACTH: 672.5 +/- 75.7 vs 364.0 +/- 33.6 pmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.002; cortisol: 29158.0 +/- 2937.0 vs 23236.7 +/- 1052.1 nmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.03). These results show that patients with diabetes insipidus have an exaggerated pituitary-adrenal response to CRH. This may be due to the fact that in diabetes insipidus AVP secretion from parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular nucleus in the hypophysial portal system is not impaired.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)