1. HAPT2D: high accuracy of prediction of T2D with a model combining basic and advanced data depending on availability
- Author
-
Jasmina Kravic, Margarita Alonso, Francesco Sambo, Enrico Longato, Bo Isomaa, Leif Groop, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Claudio Cobelli, Andrea Facchinetti, Liisa Hakaste, Rafael Gabriel, Tiinamaija Tuomi, and Barbara Di Camillo
- Subjects
Adult ,Blood Glucose ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Waist ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Population ,Statistics as Topic ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Type 2 diabetes ,Impaired glucose tolerance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,Statistics ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective Studies ,10. No inequality ,Prospective cohort study ,education ,Finland ,education.field_of_study ,Framingham Risk Score ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Anthropometry ,Middle Aged ,Models, Theoretical ,medicine.disease ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Spain ,Predictive value of tests ,Female ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
ObjectiveType 2 diabetes arises from the interaction of physiological and lifestyle risk factors. Our objective was to develop a model for predicting the risk of T2D, which could use various amounts of background information.Research design and methodsWe trained a survival analysis model on 8483 people from three large Finnish and Spanish data sets, to predict the time until incident T2D. All studies included anthropometric data, fasting laboratory values, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and information on co-morbidities and lifestyle habits. The variables were grouped into three sets reflecting different degrees of information availability. Scenario 1 included background and anthropometric information; Scenario 2 added routine laboratory tests; Scenario 3 also added results from an OGTT. Predictive performance of these models was compared with FINDRISC and Framingham risk scores.ResultsThe three models predicted T2D risk with an average integrated area under the ROC curve equal to 0.83, 0.87 and 0.90, respectively, compared with 0.80 and 0.75 obtained using the FINDRISC and Framingham risk scores. The results were validated on two independent cohorts. Glucose values and particularly 2-h glucose during OGTT (2h-PG) had highest predictive value. Smoking, marital and professional status, waist circumference, blood pressure, age and gender were also predictive.ConclusionsOur models provide an estimation of patient’s risk over time and outweigh FINDRISC and Framingham traditional scores for prediction of T2D risk. Of note, the models developed in Scenarios 1 and 2, only exploited variables easily available at general patient visits.
- Published
- 2017