Search

Ibandronate is a drug widely used outside Japan for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is available in formulations for intermittent intravenous (i.v.) administration and for intermittent (once monthly) oral administration. Ibandronate was recently approved in Japan as an i.v. injection with a dosing regimen of 1.0 mg once a month. To establish the optimal dose for oral administration of ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of and pharmacodynamic response to ibandronate following oral and intravenous administrations to Japanese subjects. Ibandronate (20, 50, 100, or 150 mg) was given orally to healthy postmenopausal Japanese women and to Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. Serial measurements were obtained for the concentrations of serum ibandronate and urinary cross-linked C-telopeptide of Type I collagen (uCTX). Pharmacokinetic parameters and the time profiles of creatinine-corrected uCTX were compared with those obtained from postmenopausal Japanese women with osteopenia after administration of 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. Following oral administration of ibandronate, the area under the serum ibandronate concentration–time curve (AUCinf) increased dose-proportionally for doses up to 100 mg; at 150 mg, AUCinf increased beyond the dose-proportionality seen with doses up to 100 mg. The AUCinf within the linear range following administration of 100 mg oral ibandronate was similar to that following 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. Additionally, corrected uCTX decreased after administration of 100 mg oral ibandronate and remained decreased for 1 month; the magnitude of the decrease was similar to or greater than that obtained after 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. From a clinical pharmacological perspective, administration of 100 mg/month oral ibandronate was equivalent to that of 1.0 mg/month i.v. ibandronate. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13318-014-0242-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The compound series of traditional anticholinergics [atropine (Atr), anisodamine (Ani), anisodine (AT3), and scopolamine (Sco)], naturally occurring belladonna alkaloid, have been approved for numerous therapeutic uses since 1970s. Tiotropium, a novel M receptor antagonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was structurally modified based on atropine-like drugs. Clinical phenomena suggested that the changes of substituent group were related to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the agents. In an attempt to compare the pharmacokinetics of the series of anticholinergics and investigate the subsets motivating selective anticholinergic potencies, a sensitive LC–MS/MS method was established to analyze the differences of pharmacokinetic parameters. In this paper, we determined the pharmacokinetics of atropine, anisodamine, anisodine, scopolamine, and tiotropium after i.v. and i.g. single dose administration. After i.v. administration, the maximum drug plasma concentrations (C max) of Atr, Ani, AT3, and Sco were 274.25 ± 53.66, 267.50 ± 33.16, 340.50 ± 44.52, and 483.75 ± 78.13 ng/mL. Tiotropium had a slightly higher area under the curve with a significant increase of C max value. Because of their partial solubility, Atr, Ani, AT3, and Sco had different bioavailability in rats of 21.62, 10.78, 80.45 and 2.52 %, respectively. Following i.g. administration of tiotropium, the C max value below 20 ng/mL revealed the very low oral absorption. The urinary excretion rates of Atr, Ani, AT3, Sco and tiotropium were 11.33, 54.86, 32.67, 8.69 and 73.91 %. This work provided relatively comprehensive preclinical data on the series of anticholinergics, which may be used to explain the clinical adverse effects and applications.

There is current emphasis for extended integration of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) into all phases of new drug development, including large-scale clinical trials. In this paper, we focus on study design and data analysis issues for the investigation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and blood level/effect relationships in patients. The application of descriptive and model-based regression statistical methodology for including sparse drug systemic concentration data in the analysis of efficacy and safety is illustrated by examples chosen from diverse therapeutic areas. The population approach, based on mixed-effects modelling, is one such methodology, which also provides new tools for analysis of response vs dose and response vs time data. The existence of a variety of statistical techniques for handling complex PK/PD time-varying data should increase the impact of such data analysis on future drug development.