1. Evaluation and review of body fluids saliva, sweat and tear compared to biochemical hydration assessment markers within blood and urine
- Author
-
Rahel Stoop, M Pini, Ron Clijsen, Michael Villiger, Erich Hohenauer, Peter Clarys, F Pereira, Thomas Vetsch, Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance, Movement and Sport Sciences, Spine Research Group, General and Biological Chemistry, and Fitness and Health Promotion
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,Saliva ,Physical activity ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Physiology ,Organism Hydration Status ,Review ,Urine ,Biomarkers/analysis ,Sweat/chemistry ,Dehydration/blood ,SWEAT ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Activities of Daily Living ,Blood plasma ,Humans ,Medicine ,Sweat ,Hydration status ,030109 nutrition & dietetics ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Dehydration ,Evaluation and review of body fluids saliva, sweat and tear compared to biochemical hydration assessment markers within blood and urine ,business.industry ,Osmolar Concentration ,Reproducibility of Results ,Saliva/chemistry ,030229 sport sciences ,Tears/chemistry ,Plasma osmolality ,Tears ,Immunology ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Evaluating and testing hydration status is increasingly requested by rehabilitation, sport, military and performance-related activities. Besides commonly used biochemical hydration assessment markers within blood and urine, which have their advantages and limitations in collection and evaluating hydration status, there are other potential markers present within saliva, sweat or tear. This literature review focuses on body fluids saliva, sweat and tear compared to blood and urine regarding practicality and hydration status influenced by fluid restriction and/or physical activity. The selected articles included healthy subjects, biochemical hydration assessment markers and a well-described (de)hydration procedure. The included studies (n=16) revealed that the setting and the method of collecting respectively accessing body fluids are particularly important aspects to choose the optimal hydration marker. To obtain a sample of saliva is one of the simplest ways to collect body fluids. During exercise and heat exposures, saliva composition might be an effective index but seems to be highly variable. The collection of sweat is a more extensive and time-consuming technique making it more difficult to evaluate dehydration and to make a statement about the hydration status at a particular time. The collection procedure of tear fluid is easy to access and causes very little discomfort to the subject. Tear osmolarity increases with dehydration in parallel to alterations in plasma osmolality and urine-specific gravity. But at the individual level, its sensitivity has to be further determined.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF