Search

OBJECTIVES: To examine the haemodynamic performance of the St Jude Trifecta valve for aortic valve replacement (AVR) at 3 years after implantation. METHODS: In a single-centre, prospective, observational, independent study, we enrolled 122 patients who had AVR using a Trifecta bioprosthesis in the July 2010-June 2011 period. A clinical and echocardiographic in-house follow-up was scheduled. RESULTS: In our series, 14.7% of patients received a 19-mm, 28.7% had a 21-mm, 35.2% had a 23-mm and 21.3% had a greater-size prosthesis. There were no cases of operative mortality or of valve-related complications both early and at follow-up (except one sudden unexplained death). Completeness of the 3-year echocardiographic follow-up was 80% among survivors. The average mean transvalvular gradient (mTVG) at 3 years was 14.2, 10.8, 8.6, 7.1 and 6.8 mmHg (sizes 19 to 27/29, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between average mTVGs measured immediately after implantation versus at the 3-year follow-up in the overall population. The average peak transvalvular gradient (pTVG) at 3 years was 25, 20, 16.8, 13.9 and 14.4 mmHg (sizes 19 to 27/29, respectively). The average indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) at 3 years was 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.3 and 1.3 cm²/m² (sizes 19-27, respectively). The rate of moderate patient- prosthesis mismatch (PPM) at 3 years was 15.7%; there were two instances of severe PPM (2.2%). All cases of PPM occurred in the 19, 21 and 23 mm size subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The Trifecta valve retains its excellent haemodynamic properties at the 3-year follow-up. The rate of PPMis considerably low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES To describe the clinical results (both early and at follow-up) of patients currently receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy for cardiac and/or pulmonary failure. To assess the effect of indications, clinical presentations and ECMO modalities on early/late clinical outcomes. To identify baseline factors associated with worse survival at follow-up. METHODS We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 325 patients receiving ECMO therapy at a tertiary referral centre during the 2005–2013 period. Follow-up was prospectively conducted by dedicated personnel (average: 84 ± 86 days, 100% complete). Survival was analysed by stratified Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS Veno-arterial (VA) ECMO was employed in 80% of cases (due to early graft failure (EGF) in 13% of cases, post-cardiotomy in 29%, primary cardiogenic shock in 42% for miscellaneous aetiologies, other indications in 15.4%) and veno-venous (VV) ECMO in the remainders (adult respiratory distress syndrome). In the VA and VV groups, weaning rates were 59 and 53%, survival at 30th postimplantation day was 44 and 45% and survival at the end of the follow-up was 41 and 45%, respectively. Implantation under advanced life support (ALS) occurred in 15% of cases (26% survival at 30 days). VA patients had a higher rate of thrombotic/haemorrhagic complications and of transfusion of blood products and shorter ventilation time. Worse early and follow-up survival were observed among patients aged ≥65 years, having pH ≤ 7, lactates >12 mmol/l, creatinine >200 μmol/l at implantation or receiving ECMO under ALS. No difference in survival was noted among VA vs VV patients. Patients receiving ECMO for EGF displayed better early and late survival (64% at 30 days and 53% at 6 months) than post-cardiotomy (36 and 34%, respectively), post-acute myocardial infarction (48 and 40%) and the remaining patients (46 and 45%). CONCLUSIONS Despite most critical baseline conditions, ECMO therapy is confirmed useful for the treatment of patients with acute cardiopulmonary failure refractory to conventional treatments. The ECMO modality (VA vs VV), as well as indications to support, identifies different patient profiles and dissimilar outcomes. Preimplantation markers of gravity and end-organ damage are useful in the stratification of expected survival. These may facilitate clinical decision-making and appropriate allocation of hospital resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is a well established and commonly utilized procedure for end-stage heart failure patients. Heterotopic heart transplantation (HHT) is a surgical procedure that allows the graft to be connected to the native heart in a parallel fashion. The main advantage of HHT is to assist the patient's native heart and to maintain circulation in the cases of severe acute rejection. HHT has also been proposed to overcome pulmonary hypertension, to increase the size of the donor pool and to decrease waiting times without increasing morbidity caused by the procedure. However, only a few papers have reported the short- or long-term results of HHT, and most of these studies have included <30 cases. OHT remains the standard technique and is preferable whenever the patient meets the current criteria and a suitable organ is available. HHT is far less useful than in the past because of the major advances in immunosuppression therapy and the development of long-term mechanical circulatory support. This study reviews the origin of HHT and discusses clinical developments, including their advantages and disadvantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report our experience with surgery of thoracic aortic rupture due to blunt trauma. Methods: Between October 1976 and October 1999, 50 patients suffering from acute rupture of the thoracic aorta due to blunt trauma were operated on. On admission, 22 patients (44%) presented with hypovolemic shock and all but five (90%) sustained major associated injuries. Thirty-one patients (62%) underwent immediate operation for aortic repair, whereas the procedure was delayed from 6 to 60 days in ten patients because of late diagnosis or coexisting life-threatening lesions thought to largely worsen the operative risk. In 48 patients, the aortic repair was carried out with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in order to maintain the distal perfusion and to prevent spinal cord injury. An inert ‘Gott’ shunt and the ‘clamp-and-sew’ technique were used in one patient each. Results: The hospital mortality amounts to 18% (nine patients). Four patients (8%) died intraoperatively and five patients (10%) died in the postoperative course. In five patients (10%) death was caused by cerebral or pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly worsened by systemic heparinization during CPB. One case of postoperative paraplegia (2%) was observed in a patient operated on with the aid of CPB. There was neither aortic rupture nor sudden death in the group of patients in whom the surgical procedure was delayed. Conclusions: The immediate outcome of patients suffering from acute traumatic aortic rupture strongly depends on the associated injuries. In some cases, the emergency aortic repair must be favorably delayed because of the necessity of life-sustaining measures and management of major coexisting injuries, which could be worsened by the use of CPB. Conversely, the risk of paraplegia is significantly reduced by the use of CPB and distal perfusion during the time of aortic cross-clamping. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a case study of a 80-year-old man with symptomatic aortic stenosis who after surgical removal of the tumor underwent radiotherapy for myxofibrosarcoma.