Search

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a valid treatment for patients with aortic valve stenosis and high or intermediate surgical risk. However, biological transcatheter valves can also experience a structural degeneration after years, and a redo-TAVR procedure (TAVR-in-TAVR) can be a valid option. We revised the current available literature for indications, procedural and technical details and outcome on TAVR-in-TAVR procedures for degenerated TAVR valves. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the public medical database for scientific articles on TAVR-in-TAVR procedures for degenerated transcatheter valves. Data on demographics, indications, first and second transcatheter valve type and size, mortality, complications and follow-up were extracted and analysed. RESULTS A total of 13 studies (1 multicentre, 3 case series, 9 case reports) were included in this review, with a total amount of 160 patients treated with TAVR-in-TAVR procedures for transcatheter valve failure. The mean age was 74.8 ± 7.8 with 84 males (52.8%). The mean elapsed time from the first TAVR procedure was 58.1 ± 23.4 months. Main indication for TAVR-in-TAVR was pure stenosis (38.4%, with mean gradient of 44.5 ± 18.5 mmHg), regurgitation (31.4%), mixed stenosis and regurgitation (29.5%) and leaflet thrombosis (8.8%). Procedural success rate was 86.8%, with second TAVR valve malposition occurred in 4 cases (2.5%). The hospital mortality rate was 1.25% (2/160). Post-procedural echocardiographic control showed moderate regurgitation in 5.6% of patients (9/160) and residual transvalvular mean gradient ≥20 mmHg in 5% of cases. Postoperative complications included major vascular complications (8.7%), new pacemaker implantation (8.7%), acute kidney failure (3.7%), stroke (0.6%) and coronary obstruction (0.6%). The mean follow-up time was 6 ± 5.6 months with 1 non-cardiovascular death reported. CONCLUSIONS TAVR-in-TAVR represents a valid alternative to standard surgery for the treatment of degenerated transcatheter valves in high-risk patients. Despite these promising results, further studies are required to assess durability and haemodynamic performances of the second TAVR valve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a major advancement in the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly high-risk patients. Implementing TAVR also in younger intermediate- or low-risk patients increases interest in the possibility of further lowering the risk of perioperative cerebrovascular events. To this aim, some embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been developed, some of which have already been approved for clinical use. Nevertheless, the cause of cerebrovascular events after TAVR is multifactorial, and selection of patients who would benefit from EPD is crucial to further improve outcomes, survival rate and quality of life. We reviewed the available literature in order to assess the incidence of and the mechanisms responsible for neurological events that can occur during TAVR, and we analysed clinical results and imaging findings following EPD use. Clinical trials for Embrella, TriGuard, Sentinel and Embol-X devices were designed to test their safety and their ability to prevent neurological complications in patients having TAVR. So far, published results showed that EPD may help in reducing the volume and size of periprocedural silent ischaemic brain lesions identified on magnetic resonance images but not in reducing the incidence of new lesions and new neurological events. The clinical impact of EPD in lowering the number of transient ischaemic attacks/strokes during TAVR needs to be further investigated in randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response from the author of the article "Aortic valve replacement in a single coronary artery arising from the right Valsalva sinus" in a 2013 issue is presented.