Search

Background: Regorafenib has shown substantial clinical activity in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Preclinical data suggested that this drug modulates antitumour immunity and is synergistic with immune checkpoint inhibition., Patients and Methods: This is a single-arm, multicentric phase II trial. Regorafenib was given 3 weeks/4, 160 mg quaque die (once a day) (QD); avelumab 10 mg/kg IV was given every two weeks, beginning at C1D15 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was the confirmed objective response rate under treatment, as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. The secondary end-points included the following: 1-year non-progression rate; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival; safety and biomarkers studies performed on sequential tumour samples obtained at baseline and at cycle 2 day 1., Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in four centres. Twenty-nine patients were assessable for efficacy after central radiological review. The best response was partial response for four patients (13.8%), stable disease for 11 patients (37.9%) and progressive disease for 14 patients (48.3%). The median PFS and overall survival were 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.9-5.5]) and 11.9 months (95%CI [6.2-NA]) respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events related to treatment were hypertension (17.6%), fatigue (14.7%) and maculopapular rash (11.8%). High baseline levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 and of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygénase expression were associated with improved outcomes., Conclusions: Regorafenib combined with avelumab has antitumour activity in a subset of heavily pretreated biliary tract cancer population. Further investigations are needed in patients selected based on tumour microenvironment features., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03475953., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement AB, CR and JPG: employees from Immusmol/Explicyte. AI: research grants MSD, BMS, ROCHE and personal fees: Epizyme, Bayer, Lilly, Roche, Springworks; non-financial support: Merck. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The difficulty in interpreting somatic alterations is correlated with the increase in sequencing panel size. To correctly guide the clinical management of patients with cancer, there needs to be accurate classification of pathogenicity followed by actionability assessment. Here, we describe a specific detailed workflow for the classification of the pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer into five categories: benign, likely benign, unknown significance, likely pathogenic and pathogenic., Methods: Classification is obtained by combining a set of eight relevant criteria in favour of either a pathogenic or a benign effect (pathogenic stand-alone, pathogenic very strong, pathogenic strong, pathogenic moderate, pathogenic supporting, benign supporting, benign strong and benign stand-alone)., Results: Our guide is concordant with the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines for germline variants. Interpretation of somatic variants requires considering specific criteria, such as the disease and therapeutic context, co-occurring genomic events in the tumour when available and the use of cancer-specific variant databases. In addition, the gene role in tumorigenesis (oncogene or tumour suppressor gene) also needs to be taken into consideration., Conclusion: Our classification could contribute to homogenize best practices on somatic variant pathogenicity interpretation and improve interpretation consistency both within and between laboratories., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Next-generation sequencing of large panel of genes had been associated with clinical benefit in a significant proportion of patients with advanced cancer. However, the molecular profile of the primary tumour from the initial surgical specimen might significantly differ from the molecular profile in a tumour sample obtained from a biopsy of a metastatic site., Patients and Methods: We compare the genetic profile of primary tumours and paired metastases by using a large panel of cancer genes. Training and validation set including a total of 152 primary and metastatic tumour pairs were sequenced (up to 429 genes) focussing on variants described in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC)., Results: Training and validation set including a total of 152 primary and metastatic tumour pairs were sequenced focussing on variants described in COSMIC. Agreement rate between the couples of primary and metastasis on COSMIC variants was 65% (24/37) and 43% (49/115) in the training and validation cohort, respectively. That rose to 74% (20/27) and 58% (42/73) when focussing on targetable mutations. In five cases, the discordance was related to appearance of secondary resistance mutation, giving a targetable refined agreement rate of 67% (67/100)., Conclusion: Up to 40% of paired primary tumour/metastases have discordant molecular profile. Liquid biopsies may overcome, in the near future, the limits of tumour tissue genotyping., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Circumferential resection margin (CRM) appears as a new powerful prognostic factor of survival after surgery for rectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate predictive factors of positive CRM following preoperative radiochemotherapy in a French trial. Patients with rectal cancer were randomised in long course preoperative radiotherapy 45 Gy plus capecitabine versus 50 Gy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Mesorectal excision was performed 6 weeks after treatment. Impact of clinical, pathological and surgical variables on positive CRM (≤1 mm) were analysed by multivariate analysis. Of 565 randomised patients, CRM was recorded in 390 cases and was positive in 8% (30/390). Patients with 50 Gy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin had a 6% rate of positive CRM while those treated by 45 Gy plus capecitabine had a 10% rate (p=0.128). Three independent predictive factors of positive CRM were identified: abdominoperineal resection (APR) (odds ratio OR=3.24; p=0.004), vascular tumour invasion (OR=2.78; p=0.026) and poor histological response (modified Dworak 0-2) (OR=9.01; p=0.003). Significant predictive factors of positive CRM are related to type of surgery, especially APR, and poor histological prognostic factors. Intensification of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy does not seem to have a major role in this study., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to establish a safe and effective regimen of fludarabine phosphate, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (F-CVP) as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-three patients >60 years were assigned successively to eight treatment cycles (Dose level 1: low F, low CV [n=4]; 2A: high F, low CV [n=8]; 2B: low F, high CV [n=4]; 3: high F, high CV [n=7]). High and low levels were: F, 25 and 20mg/m(2), respectively (Days 1-5); C, 750 and 500 mg/m(2), respectively (Day 1); and V, 1.4 and 1mg/m(2), respectively (Day 1). Patients received P at 40 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5. Response was assessed after Cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8. At level 3, dose-limiting toxicity (opportunistic infections and neutropenia) became evident, particularly after Cycle 6. Further patients were recruited at Dose level 2A. All regimens proved effective, with an OR rate of 78% (65% CR), and 3-year survival of 65% (+/-10%). Among 18 responders, 51% were still in response at 3 and 5 years. The study shows that this combination therapy is highly effective. The addition of F to CVP at Dose level 2A was feasible and increased the CR rate, with good tolerability in elderly patients.

This study was conducted to determine the prognostic influence of obvious peritumoral vascular emboli as prospectively determined by a simple routine slide examination in patients with operable node-negative breast cancer. Obvious peritumoral emboli (OPE) were defined by the presence of neoplastic emboli within unequivocal vascular lumina (including both lymphatic spaces and blood capillaries) in areas adjacent to but outside the margins of the carcinoma. OPE were assessed routinely on 5 microns thick haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections for each of 1320 primary operable node-negative breast cancers from 1975 to 1992 at our institution. OPE and other prognostic variables (tumour size, SBR grade, oestrogen and progesterone receptor status) were correlated to overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free interval (MFI) by means of univariate and multivariate analysis with a median follow-up of 103 months. OPE were found in 19.5% of tumours. In univariate analysis, OPE were related to tumour size (P = 6.3 x 10(-5)) and histologic grade (P = 4.9 x 10(-7)). Statistically significant correlations were found with OS (P = 4.6 x 10(-5)) and MFI (P = 6.4 x 10(-9)). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis, OPE was an independent prognostic variable, the most predictive factor for MFI (P = 7.7 x 10(-7)) before tumour size and grade, and was second after tumour grade for OS (P = 0.002). This study on a large unicentric series and with a long follow-up confirms the prognostic significance of vascular emboli in patients with operable node-negative breast carcinoma. Importantly, vascular emboli were found to be accurately detectable by a simple routine and non-time-consuming method. Therefore, such obvious vascular emboli should be considered as an important cost-effective, prognostic variable in patients with node-negative breast carcinoma.