Search

Background: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare diseases, with diverse clinical behaviour and prognosis. Intermittent dosing sunitinib represents the gold-standard systemic treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy. To ensure more homogeneous drug exposure, continuous daily dosing (CDD) sunitinib is utilised in other malignancies; however, no data exist in patients with TETs., Methods: We retrospectively examined data from patients with platinum-resistant TETs receiving CDD sunitinib 37.5 mg between 1 May 2017 and 31 May 2022 within the Italian collaborative group for ThYmic MalignanciEs. Primary end-points were median progression-free survival, overall response rate (ORR), median duration of response and major treatment-related adverse events., Results: A total of 20 consecutive patients (12 thymic carcinoma [TC], 6 B3, and 2 B2 thymoma) were evaluated. Among the 19 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 31.6% (95% CI, 12.5%-56.5%). Among patients with TC, one complete response, four partial responses, and four stable diseases were observed (ORR 41%).The overall median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.5-10.3): 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.4-NA) within patients with thymoma and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-10.3) in patients with TC; median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% CI, 2.8-NA). CDD was associated with a manageable toxicity profile. Six patients (30%) experienced >G2 toxicity, nine required dose reduction and three discontinued treatment due to adverse events., Conclusions: CDD sunitinib showed a relevant antitumor activity and confirmed a good toxicity profile. Similar effectiveness and a better toxicity profile as compared with intermittent dosing historical data suggest that this schedule should be considered., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement GC reports personal fees for consulting, advisory role and speakers' bureau from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Samsung and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Ellipses Pharma and fees for travel and accommodations from Roche/Genentech and Pfizer. All the competing interests were outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Proto-oncogene KIT is the gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase protein KIT. Activating mutations are found in 2.9% of neoplasms, with the highest prevalence in gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Exon 17 mutations typically alter the kinase activation loop and are relatively rare, representing 11.7% of all activating KIT mutations. Recently, KIT exon 17 mutants turned out to be a potential molecular target for the type 1 kinase inhibitor avapritinib (BLU-285)., Objective: In this framework, we aimed at investigating the potential activity of avapritinib in mucosal melanoma and thymic carcinoma, two disease histologies with dismal prognosis, currently lacking evidence-based second line treatment options and in which KIT exon 17 activating mutations could represent a relevant therapeutic target., Results: In this series, we report the only four cases of patients affected by exon 17 mutant mucosal melanoma and thymic carcinoma that have been treated in Italy with avapritinib within a Compassionate Use Program. Two patients harboured mucosal melanoma and the other two were diagnosed with thymic carcinoma. We describe a differential activity of avapritinib (3/4 patients responded, 1/4 did not respond), along with possible hypotheses to justify such differences and potential implications for precision oncology., Conclusions: Taken together, the inactivity of imatinib on KIT exon 17 mutations, the general low clinical efficacy of immunotherapy, as well as the consequent formal lack of standard available and active second line systemic treatments in both mucosal melanoma and thymic carcinoma, support the implementation of avapritinib in the therapeutic armamentarium, even though further prospective evidence is warranted., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We retrospectively investigated the role of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma., Methods: We selected all patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma, who had received radical surgery between January 2005 and December 2019 at 33 European sarcoma reference centers. The primary objective was to compare the outcome of patients who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not, in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). To reduce the risk of confounding due to imbalance, a propensity-score matching(PSM) was performed. Finally, subgroups analysis was performed according to tumor site, tumor size (< 50 mm or ≥ 50 mm) and patients predicted 10-years OS according to the nomogram sarculator (two different cutoff-values were applied: ≤ 33% or > 33% and < 60% or ≥ 60%)., Results: 362 patients were analyzed: 149 (41.2%; treated group) received (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and 213 (58.6%; control group) did not. The median follow-up for the OS endpoint was 5.1 years (95% CI: 4.0-5.5). The OS-HR was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.40-0.83; p-value = 0.003) in the univariate analysis and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38-1.43; p = 0.367) in the PSM analysis. The DFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.98; p-value = 0.036) in the univariate analysis, and 0.91 (95% CI:0.56-1.48; p-value = 0.7) in the PSM analysis. The DMFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55-1.02; p-value = 0.065) in univariate analysis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.53-1.61; p-value = 0.769) in the PSM analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed no heterogeneity of results in strata of tumor site. On the contrary, there was a trend for heterogeneity according to tumor size and patient's risk of death. For all the endpoints analyzed, patients with tumors smaller than 50 mm or at lower risk of death seem to have no benefit from chemotherapy, while patients with larger tumors or at higher risk of death at 10 years seem to derive substantial benefit., Conclusion: This large, retrospective study suggests that patients affected by > 50 mm and/or high-risk primary, localized angiosarcoma could benefit from (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: International guidelines recommend severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine for patients with cancer. A substantial risk of developing vaccine-related autoimmune toxicities could be hypothesised for patients with thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) due to their high risk of autoimmune disorders (ADs). Moreover, a cross-reaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies and various tissue proteins has been shown, and antibodies against nucleoproteins showed overlaps in the autoimmune cross-reaction with antibodies to spike protein. Due to the rarity of TETs, no data addressing this hypothesis are available., Methods: Patients with TETs who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, treated in 4 referral centres of the Italian Collaborative Group for ThYmic MalignanciEs (TYME) network between February 2021 and September 2021, were interviewed through a standardised 15-items questionnaire in order to describe the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients affected by TETs., Results: Data from 245 doses of vaccine administered to 126 patients (41 = thymic carcinoma, 85 = thymoma; 38 with AD, of which 26 with active AD) were collected. Nine patients had a previous COVID-19-positive swab. No cases of AD reactivation or worsening of a pre-existing AD were seen in the study population. A new diagnosis of myasthenia gravis likely unrelated to the vaccine was made in two patients after the vaccination. Sixty-four patients (51%) experienced a total of 103 adverse events, all G1/G2, most commonly fatigue, new or worsening muscle pain and chills. None AE required patients' hospitalisation., Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines appear to be safe in patients with TET, even in case of active or pre-existing AD., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare aggressive tumour occurring in adults characterised by one of the lowest tumor mutational burdens (TMB). Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a mutational signature, caused by defects in the DNA MisMatch Repair (MMR) system, that predicts benefit from immunotherapy and causes high TMB. Fragmentary and unstructured evidence of these conditions co-occurring are reported in literature., Objective: Review available data on the co-occurrence of these two conditions and determine its frequency in our institute case series., Design: We performed a systematic analysis of literature and a retrospective evaluation of all the cases of TET treated at our institution from 2000 to 2020, selecting patients with a medical history of multiple tumours to enhance a priori probability of identifying cases with underlying predisposition., Results: Literature yielded 3 cases of patients with MSI TC, for which MMR gene alteration was reported. None of them received immunotherapy. Of 366 patients with TETs treated in our institute, 32 had a medical history of multiple tumours and 25 of 32 (19 thymomas and 6 TCs) had available tissue for MMR analysis. One patient with TC showed a high TMB, and MSI due to MLH1 mutation and was treated in a phase II study with avelumab and axitinib combination obtaining a long-lasting partial response. MLH1 alterations are shared across MSI TC cases., Conclusions and Relevance: This analysis highlights the usefulness of MSI testing in patients with TC. The observation of cases of TC occurring in patients with Lynch syndrome and the unexpected homogeneity of gene alterations support further investigation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited evidence is available on effectiveness of clinicoradiological follow-up of early-stage NSCLC patients. MAGRIT was a phase III adjuvant RCT conducted in surgically resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, in which all participants had a prospectively defined intensive clinicoradiological follow-up., Methods: At patient-level data, we analyzed detection modality of disease recurrences and new primary lung cancer (i.e. detected by clinicoradiological scheduled exams versus by interim unscheduled exams), features associated with higher risk of locoregional and/or distant recurrence, and recurrence rates over time., Results: In the 2261 patients studied, there was a significant association between the type of recurrence and the modality of detection: 88.4% (95% CI, 84%-91%) of the locoregional recurrences and 93.2% (95% CI, 84%-99%) of the new primary lung cancers were detected by scheduled exams, whereas this was only 68.7% (95% CI, 65%-73%) for distant metastases (p < 0.001). Survival of patients with locoregional recurrence or new primary lung cancer detected by scheduled exams was significantly better as compared with those detected by unscheduled exams (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.87; p = 0.01). Survival was similarly poor in patients with distant recurrences, both with scheduled and unscheduled detection (3-year survival after recurrence 22.0% and 21.8%, respectively). Recurrence rate was the highest in the first 18 months after surgery-with a peak between month 6 and 12-decreasing thereafter. The hazard of a second primary lung cancer was constant over time., Conclusion: Intensive follow-up is effective in detecting locoregional recurrences and second primary lung cancers, with impact on patients' survival but did not influence the detection of distant recurrences., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The goal of drug development is to define potential risks and benefits of new therapies. Assessment of new drugs for their potential to alter cardiac repolarisation, prolong QTc interval and induce potentially fatal proarrhythmias such as 'torsade de pointes' is now one of the major goals during phase I-II studies. The results from these early phase clinical studies can profoundly influence 'go, no-go' decisions as well as decisions on the selection of optimal dose regimen for subsequent development, its delivery and conduct of pivotal clinical studies, including eligibility of patients. Increasingly, anticancer drugs are now also attracting attention with regard to their proarrhythmic safety. Unfortunately, regulatory guidelines focus essentially on non-cytotoxic drugs and there is no clear guidance available for evaluation of the potential of cytotoxic drugs to alter cardiac repolarisation during their development. We propose a strategy to assess the QT-liability of a cytotoxic agent in early phase I-II studies without compromising the objectives of these studies or patient access to potentially beneficial novel agents. A pragmatic and thoughtful strategy for the assessment of this proarrhythmic risk and its management, involving close collaboration between drug developers, regulatory agencies, oncologists and cardiologists, is essential for the development of these oncology agents.

LY355703 is a synthetic derivative of the marine cryptophycins, cytotoxic agents which induce mitotic arrest by binding at the microtubule vinca binding domain. Promising preclinical features of LY355703 were the 40-400 greater potency than paclitaxel or vinca alkaloids, the broad spectrum of antitumor activity in xenografts and the antitumour activity in multidrug resistant (MDR)-expressing murine tumours. Aims of this study were to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose recommended for Phase II, the pattern of toxicity, the pharmacokinetic profile and to document hints of antitumour activity of LY355703 given as 2-h infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks (Study 1) or, later on, on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Study 2). The latter weekly regimen was selected because of the acute dose-related toxicity reported in Study 1. The dose was escalated using a modified Continual Reassessment Method. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1 of cycle 1 in both studies; LY355703 plasma concentrations were assessed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 35 adult patients with solid tumours entered Study 1; the dose was escalated from 0.1 to 1.92 mg/m(2); at this dose 2 of 5 patients presented grade 3 neuropathy and myalgias; 1.48 mg/m(2) was then recommended for Phase II study. A total of 8 patients were treated in Study 2 at 1 mg/m(2); cumulative long-lasting neuroconstipation and neurosensory toxicity precluded the completion of the cycle in 9 out of 15 cycles; the clinical development of the weekly regimen was then discontinued. Other toxicities included cardiac dysrhythmia and mild alopecia. Pharmacokinetics of LY355703 appeared to be linear over the dose range studied. The administration of LY355703 on a 3-week schedule is associated with an acute dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy and myalgia of high interpatient variability for which possible risk factors and pharmacokinetic correlates could not be identified.