Search

Background: Following European guidelines, patients with aggressive metastatic or locally advanced, non-resectable, duodeno-pancreatic (DP) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) should receive systemic combination chemotherapy until progression. Aggressive disease is defined as progressive and/or symptomatic metastases with or without significant hepatic invasion (>30-50%), and/or bone metastases., Methods: This academic randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study aims to evaluate lanreotide autogel 120 mg (LAN) as maintenance treatment after at least 2 months of first-line treatment (L1) in aggressive G1-G2 DP-NET. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LAN or placebo (PBO), every 28 days, until progression or toxicity. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months., Results: Among the 118 planned patients, 53 were included. Of these, 81.1% had a G2 tumour, and 90.6% had metastatic disease. L1 therapy consisted of chemotherapy (96.8%). Median duration of L1 was 4.6 months (range: 2.0-7.7). At the time of randomisation, 81.1% of patients had stable disease. Median follow-up was 27.0 months (95% CI: 19.5; 31.2). PFS at 6 months was 73.1% (90% CI: 55.3; 86.6) in LAN versus 54.2% (90% CI: 35.8; 71.8) in PBO. Median PFS was 19.4 months (95% CI: 7.6; 32.6) and 7.6 months (95% CI: 3.0; 9.0), respectively. Median overall survival was 41.9 months in PBO and was not reached in LAN. The toxicity profile was mainly grade 1-2 expected toxicities., Conclusions: The encouraging results of lanreotide autogel 120 mg as a maintenance treatment after L1 in aggressive G1/2 DP-NET should be confirmed., Trial Registration: NCT02288377 (clinicaltrials.gov)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Côme Lepage worked as a member of the advisory board for Novartis, personal fees from Novartis, IPSEN, grants from Merck, IPSEN. Thomas Walter worked as a member of advisory boards for AAA, IPSEN, Keocyt and Novartis. Astrid Lièvre reports grants from Bayer Lilly, Merck and Novartis; personal fees from AAA, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, HalioDx, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and Servier; non-financial support from AAA, Amgen, Bayer, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Servier and Integragen. David Tougeron reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis; personal fees from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers SquibbIpsen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi and Servier. Catherine Lombard-Bohas worked as a member of advisory boards for AAA, IPSEN, Keocyt, Novartis. Jean-Louis Legoux worked as a member of an advisory board for Novartis, reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer (clinical research), Novartis, Keocyt, Servier (courses, training), Merck, Servier, Keocyt (invitations to national or international congresses). All remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Emerging evidence supports combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional or targeted therapies to enhance ICI antitumour activity and broaden the spectrum of patients who respond to ICIs. Here, we present the safety and preliminary efficacy of ramucirumab, an anti-VEGFR2 IgG1, plus durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 IgG1, in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (gastric/GEJ), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Patients and Methods: A 25-centre, phase Ia/b single-arm, non-randomised, multi-cohort study was undertaken in patients with advanced/metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0-1, progression on prior therapy, no prior ramucirumab or immunotherapy and any PD-L1 status. Patients received ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) plus durvalumab (1125 mg) intravenously Q3W (NSCLC), or ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) plus durvalumab (750 mg) Q2W (gastric/GEJ, HCC)., Results: Phase Ia treatment was found safe for phase Ib expansion; final enrolment was NSCLC (n = 28), gastric/GEJ (n = 29), HCC (n = 28). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.1%, 37.9% and 42.9% of patients, respectively. The most common were fatigue (35.7%), hypertension (34.5%) and diarrhoea (28.6%), respectively. Two patients died owing to an adverse event; one was treatment-related (hepatitis acute, HCC cohort). Objective response rate was 11% for NSCLC and HCC and 21% for gastric/GEJ. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 2.7 and 11 months in NSCLC; 2.6 and 12.4 months in gastric/GEJ; 4.4 and 10.7 months in HCC, with more prolonged survival in patients with high PD-L1 expression., Conclusion: Ramucirumab/durvalumab exhibited manageable safety. The combination showed antitumour activity in all cohorts, particularly in patients with high PD-L1 expression., (Copyright © 2020 Eli Lilly and Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) pathways, which promote tumour growth and proliferation, are often deregulated in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. We assessed whether adding panitumumab (an EGFR inhibitor) or rilotumumab (a HGF inhibitor) to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy (modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) benefits to patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: This phase II, open-label, randomised, three-arm study enrolled patients ≥18 years, with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 and no known HER2 overexpression. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 , 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m 2 bolus then 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 h) alone or combined with panitumumab (6 mg/kg) or rilotumumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until limiting toxicity, patient's refusal or disease progression. The primary end-point was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and tolerance., Results: The study enrolled 162 patients in 29 French centres. The median follow-up was 23.6 months (interquartile range = 16.4-29.0). The 4-month PFS rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57-82) with chemotherapy alone, 57% (95% CI = 42-71) combined with panitumumab and 61% (95% CI = 47-74) combined with rilotumumab. Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI = 8.7-16.9) with chemotherapy alone, 8.3 months (95% CI = 6.2-13.2) combined with panitumumab and 11.5 months (95% CI = 7.9-17.1) combined with rilotumumab. Adverse events grade ≥III occurred less frequently with chemotherapy alone (62%) than with panitumumab (83%) and rilotumumab (89%)., Conclusions: We found no benefit in adding panitumumab or rilotumumab to mFOLFOX6 first-line chemotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients., Trial Registration: European Clinical Trials Database, number 2009-012797-12., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Pre-clinical data have shown that combining trifluridine/tipiracil with oxaliplatin enhances anti-tumour activity compared with either monotherapy. A phase I dose-escalation study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) for phase II and pharmacokinetic profile of this combination in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had progressed after at least 1 prior line of treatment., Methods: Using a 3 + 3 design, patients received escalating trifluridine/tipiracil doses from 25, then 30 and to 35 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1-5, q14 days, together with a fixed dose of 85 mg/m 2 of oxaliplatin day 1, q14 days. An intermediate cohort with a lower oxaliplatin dose (65 mg/m 2 ) was also investigated. After MTD determination, additional patients were treated to define the RD., Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. One dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed at the highest dose level, which was established as the MTD and subsequently the RD. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were asthenia, nausea, diarrhoea, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, decreased appetite, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, anaemia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Most drug-related AEs (93.0%) were of grade 1-2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of trifluridine/tipiracil were not influenced by oxaliplatin co-administration. Best overall responses at the RD (n = 14) included 1 patient with partial response (7.1%) and 7 patients with stable disease (50.0%)., Conclusion: The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil and oxaliplatin in patients with mCRC has a manageable safety profile with some efficacy. The RD is 35 mg/m 2 of trifluridine/tipiracil twice daily, days 1-5, q14 days and 85 mg/m 2 of oxaliplatin day 1, q14 CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT02848443., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The benefit of second-line chemotherapy (L2) over standard first-line (L1) gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) or oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) is unclear. Our aim was to identify and validate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with L2 in aBTC to guide clinical decisions in this setting., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of four prospective patient cohorts: a development cohort (28 French centres) and three validation cohorts from Italy, UK and France. All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving L2 after GEMCIS/GEMOX L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. The association of clinicobiological data with OS was investigated in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. A simple score was derived from the multivariate model., Results: The development cohort included 405 patients treated with L1 GEMOX (91%) or GEMCIS. Of them, 55.3% were men, and median age was 64.8 years. Prior surgical resection was observed in 26.7%, and 94.8% had metastatic disease. Performance status (PS) was 0, 1 and 2 in 17.8%, 52.4% and 29.7%, respectively. Among 22 clinical parameters, eight were associated with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, four were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05): PS, reason for L1 discontinuation, prior resection of primary tumour and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The model had the Harrell's concordance index of 0.655, a good calibration and was validated in the three external cohorts (N = 392)., Conclusion: We validated previously reported predictive factors of OS with L2 and identified peritoneal carcinomatosis as a new pejorative factor in nearly 800 patients. Our model and score may be useful in daily practice and for future clinical trial design., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To determine efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy combined with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid (FOLFOX) and cetuximab in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer were enrolled in a Simon's two-stage phase II study. Patients received FOLFOX and weekly cetuximab on week 1-10 with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 30 fractions) on week 5-10. Primary end-point was clinical overall response rate (ORR). An ORR rate of more than 50% was expected., Results: Among the 79 included patients, clinical ORR was 77% with 40% complete responses. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 21.6 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common grade III-IV toxicities observed during experimental chemoimmunotherapy followed by chemoradiation included neutropenia (28%), oesophagitis (12%), rash (11%), and allergy (9%). There was one treatment-related death due to oesophagitis with gastrointestinal bleeding., Conclusions: Cetuximab-FOLFOX regimen combined with radiotherapy demonstrated its efficacy and was well tolerated. Unfortunately, these results were not confirmed in two recent phase III studies., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim of the Study: Neuroendocrine tumours are highly vascular neoplasms known to overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor. Bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, was assessed in combination with chemotherapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (P-NET)., Patients and Methods: BETTER was a multicentre, open-label, non-randomised, two-group phase II trial. Patients with progressive metastatic, well-differentiated P-NET received a minimum of 6 month treatment of bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg IV on d1 q3w with 5-FU at 400 mg/m2/day and streptozocin at 500 mg/m2/day IV from d1 to d5 every 42 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), overall response rate, safety and quality of life., Results: A total of 34 patients were included. Median age was 55 years, 65% of patients were men, 97% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and 97% had a Ki-67 proliferative index of <15%. After a maximum of 24 month follow-up per patient, the median PFS assessed by investigators was 23.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.1; not reached], 19 (56%) patients had a partial response and 15 (44%) had stable disease as best response. OS rate at 24 months was 88%. The most frequently reported grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (21% patients), abdominal pain (12%) and thromboembolic events (9%)., Conclusion: Bevacizumab with 5-FU/streptozocin in the treatment of pancreatic NETs seems to be feasible with a PFS of 23.7 months, which deserves further attention. No unexpected toxicity was observed., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive phase III trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma comparing 5FU, folinic acid and cisplatin combination followed by gemcitabine (Arm A) versus the opposite sequence (Arm B) failed to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival. To longitudinally compare the quality of life (QoL) we explored different definitions of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) of QoL scores according to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) cut-offs., Methods: QoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 every 8 weeks until death. The following scores were analysed: global health, emotional functioning, physical functioning, fatigue and pain. TUDD was defined as the time interval between randomisation and the first occurrence of a decrease in QLQ-C30 score ≥5 points without any further improvement in QoL score ≥5 points or any further available QoL data. Analyses were repeated using a 10 point MCID and/or including death as event., Results: From 08/2003 to 05/2006, 102 patients in Arm A and 100 in Arm B were included. Using a 5 and a 10 point MCID, TUDD curves of the 5 scores did not differ according to treatment arm., The median TUDD of global health was 5.2 months (4.3-6.2) in Arm A and 6.1 months (5.1-8.5) in Arm B (log-rank p=0.50) including death as an event for a 5 point MCID. Multivariate Cox model showed that tumour localisation and progression were independently associated with TUDD (p<0.05)., Conclusions: The strategy of chemotherapy did not influence the deterioration of QoL. The TUDD approach seems to provide meaningful clinical results that are adapted to metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma trials., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A previous study reported a significant survival benefit for octreotide compared with no treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This was investigated further in this multicentre study., Patients and Methods: Two hundred and seventy two patients with HCC who were ineligible for curative treatments or had relapsed following potentially curative therapies were randomised to receive long-acting octreotide, 30 mg as an intramuscular injection once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years, or placebo., Results: At the time of the final analysis, median overall survival (OS) was 6.53 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-8.3) for octreotide versus 7.03 months (95% CI, 5.43-8.53) for placebo (p=0.34). Progression-free survival (p=0.26) also did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. No objective responses were achieved in the octreotide group but 33% of patients achieved disease stabilisation for a mean time of 5.5 months (95% CI, 1.1-9.9). The median time until definitive global health score deterioration (according to QLQ-C30) was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.7) in the octreotide and 4 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.7) in the placebo group (p=0.09). There were four objective responses in the placebo group. Octreotide was well tolerated; seven patients reported severe adverse events possibly related to octreotide and there were no cases of haematoma or cholecystitis., Conclusions: In patients with advanced HCC, octreotide has a favourable safety profile but does not improve OS and could have a negative impact on quality of life.