Search

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation by querying a large sample of various professionals in health care with a comprehensive set of barriers. Methods: We developed a questionnaire comprising 55 barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation and administered it to four different types of medical, care and social work experts involved in the referral to cancer rehabilitation. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and the extracted factors were ranked by mean values. Additionally, ANOVAs were calculated to test for group differences. Results: Our sample (N = 606) consisted of 249 physicians, 194 social workers, 105 nurses and 55 psychologists in Germany. We identified seven barrier‐dimensions: low appreciation of rehabilitation by professionals, insufficient coordination, insufficient application procedure, rehabilitation requirements not met, patients' unfulfilled demands, patients' social responsibilities and patients' coping style, with the latter being rated as the most obstructive thereof. Furthermore, we found statistically significant group differences for six of these factors with small‐ to medium‐sized effects. Conclusion: Our results support previous publications implicating the patients' coping style as a barrier. We furthermore found evidence for barriers relating to processes and organisational issues, thereby expanding on the scope of patient‐oriented publications. Suggestions for improving patients' health services accessibility are made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to report HRQOL, patient activation and physical functioning of haematological patients, participating in a 6‐month multimodal interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme HAPPY, when undergoing non‐myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NMA‐HSCT). Methods: A prospective single‐arm longitudinal design. Outcomes were collected as part of a feasibility study and included: HRQOL (EORTC QLQ‐C30), patient activation measure (PAM), cardiorespiratory capacity (VO2peak), leg extensor power, lean body mass, measured pre‐NMA‐HSCT at 3‐, 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up. Results: Thirty (mean age (SD) 64.1 (6.5)) out of 34 patients participated and 18 completed HAPPY. Outcome measures showed large individual differences of decline and improvement during follow‐up. Patients rated HRQOL as good (median 70.8; range 33.3–100). Fatigue, dyspnoea, insomnia and appetite loss mainly remained or worsened. PAM stayed in the upper half of range (median 55.6; range 20.5–84.8) with a trend towards improvement at 12‐month follow‐up. Physical functioning scores were low [i.e. baseline VO2peak, men median 1.5 L/min range (1.0–2.9), women 1.0 L/min (0.8–1.4), leg extensor power men 2.1 Watt/kg range (1.3–3.8), women 1.7 Watt/kg (1.3–2.4), lean body mass men 19.5% (17.6–24.9) and women 17.8% (15.3–21.7)]. Conclusion: The sustained low level of physical functioning and symptoms 12‐month after NMA‐HSCT emphasise the need for pre‐rehabilitation and long‐lasting rehabilitation support in this frail patient group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]