Search

International audience; BACKGROUND: Cancer patients with CD4 lymphopenia have an increased risk of severe toxicity after administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The impact of CD4 lymphopenia on long term overall survival (OS) of cancer patients was explored in this work. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first prospective series (test series) included 219 patients with solid tumours, lymphomas or myelomas receiving chemotherapy within an oncology department in 1999 and 2000. A phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry was performed before chemotherapy on day 1. The prognostic value of total, CD4, CD8 and CD56 lymphocyte count for OS was tested in a multivariate analysis. The prognostic value of low CD4 counts was then tested in a validation series of 269 patients with metastatic solid tumours in second line treatment included in a prospective observational study in the Centre Leon Berard. RESULTS: In the test series, all patients with metastatic cancers and CD4 lymphopenia ≤ 200/μL (12% of metastatic patients) died within 18 months with a median OS of 5.9 months. CD4 count was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis. In the validation series, 83 (30%) of patients had CD4 count ≤ 200/μL: their median overall survival was 3.9 months with an 18-month survival rate of 6%. CD4 count was also an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in this series. CONCLUSIONS: CD4 lymphopenia

Open biopsy is recommended for a soft-tissue sarcoma (s-t-S) diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB) was recently associated with minimal morbidity, cost and time-consumption, but also potential inaccuracy. Its diagnostic utility was investigated retrospectively in 110 patients with soft-tissue masses (s-t-M) undergoing CNB between September 1994 and September 2000. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were determined for malignancy (benign/malign), soft-tissue tumour (yes/no), and sarcoma diagnosis (yes/no), comparing CNB and the best standard test available; concordance was evaluated. 103/110 CNB were suitable for analysis. Final diagnosis was 23 benign tumours (19%), 65 s-t-S (59%), 9 lymphomas (8%), 6 fibromatoses (desmoid) (5%) and 7 carcinomas (6%). CNB Sp and PPV were 100%, Se was 95, 99 and 92%, and NPV 85, 95 and 88% for diagnosing malignancy, soft-tissue tumour and sarcoma. CNB Se and NPV were 100% for malignancy, connective tumour and sarcoma in lymphomas, high-grade sarcomas and desmoid tumours. In low grade sarcomas, Se was 94 and 85%, and NPV 84 and 77% for malignancy and sarcoma. Histological grade on CNB seems uneasy, except for grade-III tumours. CNB is accurate, not misleading for s-t-M diagnosis, avoids open biopsy complications, and allows one-surgery or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy planning when combined with appropriate imaging.