1. Assessing the benefit of cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale over time.
- Author
-
Thomson, Sasha, Witzke, Noah, Gyawali, Bishal, Delos Santos, Seanthel, Udayakumar, Suji, Cardone, Claudia, Cheung, Matthew C., and Chan, Kelvin K.W.
- Subjects
- *
DRUG approval , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *TUMORS , *ONCOLOGY , *PHARMACODYNAMICS - Abstract
Increasingly, cancer drugs are being approved based on surrogate measurements of efficacy. Clinically meaningful data, such as overall survival (OS) and quality of life, are often only presented in subsequent publications. We examined if the clinical benefit of cancer drugs, as measured by the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS), improves post-European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval as more data emerges. Cancer drug indications approved by the EMA from January 2006 to December 2016 were reviewed and trials cited for efficacy were identified. Primary and subsequent publications (up to December 2019) of scorable trials were included. Changes in benefit over time were measured using ESMO-MCBS thresholds for non-curative (≥4 for substantial, =3 for intermediate and ≤2 for low benefit) and curative intent (A or B for major benefit) scoring. Fifty-five non-curative and two curative intent trials were included. At approval, 29.1% of non-curative trials were substantial, 45.5% intermediate and 25.5% low benefit. For curative intent trials, one displayed major benefit and one displayed no major benefit. We identified 82 subsequent publications for reassessment. A change in ESMO-MCBS classification was seen in 34.5% of non-curative trials (11 raised and 8 lowered). At 3-year reassessment, 36.4% of non-curative trials were substantial, 34.5% intermediate and 29.1% low benefit. Both curative trials showed no major benefit at reassessment. As over a third of trials changed classification, in either direction, reassessing the ESMO-MCBS score of approved cancer drugs may help to inform patients and ensure ongoing relevance of regulatory and reimbursement decisions. • When reassessed, most cancer drugs did not exhibit substantial benefit. • Over a third of drug trials changed benefit classification at 3-year reassessment. • However, a nearly equal number of trials increased and decreased their benefit. • Thus, it may be useful to regularly reassess the benefit of approved cancer drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF