1. Accuracy and reproducibility of novel echocardiographic three-dimensional automated software for the assessment of the aortic root in candidates for thanscatheter aortic valve replacement.
- Author
-
García-Martín A, Lázaro-Rivera C, Fernández-Golfín C, Salido-Tahoces L, Moya-Mur JL, Jiménez-Nacher JJ, Casas-Rojo E, Aquila I, González-Gómez A, Hernández-Antolín R, and Zamorano JL
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aorta diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality, Automation, Cohort Studies, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional instrumentation, Female, Humans, Male, Observer Variation, Patient Selection, Preoperative Care methods, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional methods, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Multidetector Computed Tomography methods, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement methods
- Abstract
Aims: A specialized three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) reconstruction tool has recently been introduced; the system automatically configures a geometric model of the aortic root from the images obtained by 3D-TOE and performs quantitative analysis of these structures. The aim of this study was to compare the measurements of the aortic annulus (AA) obtained by the new model to that obtained by 3D-TOE and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in candidates to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess the reproducibility of this new method., Methods and Results: We included 31 patients who underwent TAVI. The AA diameters and area were evaluated by the manual 3D-TOE method and by the automatic software. We showed an excellent correlation between the measurements obtained by both methods: intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.731 (0.508-0.862), r: 0.742 for AA diameter and ICC: 0.723 (0.662-0.923), r: 0.723 for the AA area, with no significant differences regardless of the method used. The interobserver variability was superior for the automatic measurements than for the manual ones. In a subgroup of 10 patients, we also found an excellent correlation between the automatic measurements and those obtained by MDCT, ICC: 0.941 (0.761-0.985), r: 0.901 for AA diameter and ICC: 0.853 (0.409-0.964), r: 0.744 for the AA area., Conclusion: The new automatic 3D-TOE software allows modelling and quantifying the aortic root from 3D-TOE data with high reproducibility. There is good correlation between the automated measurements and other 3D validated techniques. Our results support its use in clinical practice as an alternative to MDCT previous to TAVI., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF