Search

Author(s): Anker, Stefan D; Butler, Javed; Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb; Abraham, William T; Bauersachs, Johann; Bocchi, Edimar; Bozkurt, Biykem; Braunwald, Eugene; Chopra, Vijay K; Cleland, John G; Ezekowitz, Justin; Filippatos, Gerasimos; Friede, Tim; Hernandez, Adrian F; Lam, Carolyn SP; Lindenfeld, JoAnn; McMurray, John JV; Mehra, Mandeep; Metra, Marco; Packer, Milton; Pieske, Burkert; Pocock, Stuart J; Ponikowski, Piotr; Rosano, Giuseppe MC; Teerlink, John R; Tsutsui, Hiroyuki; Van Veldhuisen, Dirk J; Verma, Subodh; Voors, Adriaan A; Wittes, Janet; Zannad, Faiez; Zhang, Jian; Seferovic, Petar; Coats, Andrew JS | Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has important implications for the safety of participants in clinical trials and the research staff caring for them and, consequently, for the trials themselves. Patients with heart failure may be at greater risk of infection with COVID-19 and the consequences might also be more serious, but they are also at risk of adverse outcomes if their clinical care is compromised. As physicians and clinical trialists, it is our responsibility to ensure safe and effective care is delivered to trial participants without affecting the integrity of the trial. The social contract with our patients demands no less. Many regulatory authorities from different world regions have issued guidance statements regarding the conduct of clinical trials during this COVID-19 crisis. However, international trials may benefit from expert guidance from a global panel of experts to supplement local advice and regulations, thereby enhancing the safety of participants and the integrity of the trial. Accordingly, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology on 21 and 22 March 2020 conducted web-based meetings with expert clinical trialists in Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and Asia. The main objectives of this Expert Position Paper are to highlight the challenges that this pandemic poses for the conduct of clinical trials in heart failure and to offer advice on how they might be overcome, with some practical examples. While this panel of experts are focused on heart failure clinical trials, these discussions and recommendations may apply to clinical trials in other therapeutic areas.

The management of patients with stroke is often multidisciplinary, involving various specialties and healthcare professionals. Given the common shared risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease, input may also be required from the cardiovascular teams, as well as patient caregivers and next-of-kin. Ultimately, the patient is central to all this, requiring a coordinated and uniform approach to the priorities of post-stroke management, which can be consistently implemented by different multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, as part of the patient ‘journey’ or ‘patient pathway,’ supported by appropriate education and tele-medicine approaches. All these aspects would ultimately aid delivery of care and improve patient (and caregiver) engagement and empowerment. Given the need to address the multidisciplinary approach to holistic or integrated care of patients with heart disease and stroke, the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke convened a Task Force, with the remit to propose a consensus on Integrated care management for optimizing the management of stroke and associated heart disease. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence and proposes consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and simple practical approaches to assist in everyday clinical practice. A post-stroke ABC pathway is proposed, as a more holistic approach to integrated stroke care, would include three pillars of management: A: Appropriate Antithrombotic therapy.B: Better functional and psychological status.C: Cardiovascular risk factors and Comorbidity optimization (including lifestyle changes).

This position paper provides a comprehensive guide for optimal follow-up of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), covering multiple relevant aspects of patient counselling. It serves as a practical guide to treating patients with acute PE complementary to the formal 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines developed with the European Respiratory Society. We propose a holistic approach considering the whole spectrum of serious adverse events that patients with acute PE may encounter on the short and long run. We underline the relevance of assessment of modifiable risk factors for bleeding, of acquired thrombophilia and limited cancer screening (unprovoked PE) as well as a dedicated surveillance for the potential development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension as part of routine practice; routine testing for genetic thrombophilia should be avoided. We advocate the use of outcome measures for functional outcome and quality of life to quantify the impact of the PE diagnosis and identify patients with the post-PE syndrome early. Counselling patients on maintaining a healthy lifestyle mitigates the risk of the post-PE syndrome and improves cardiovascular prognosis. Therefore, we consider it important to discuss when and how to resume sporting activities soon after diagnosing PE. Additional patient-relevant topics that require Focused counselling are travel and birth control., Graphical Abstract Graphical AbstractOverview of main conclusions of the position paper. APS, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CTEPH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; PE, pulmonary embolism.

Сърдечно-съдовата медицина през 2022 г.: най-добрите 10 статии за спешните състояния в кардиологията и исхемичната болест на сърцето The year in cardiovascular medicine 2022: the top 10 papers in acute cardiac care and ischaemic heart disease

Background Statin intolerance is a clinical syndrome whereby adverse effects associated with statin therapy (most commonly muscle symptoms) result in the discontinuation of therapy. Statin discontinuation is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiac outcomes. Many patients who initially experience adverse effects are able to tolerate statin therapy to some extent. Careful stepwise diagnosis and management of individuals who experience adverse effects is essential to enable optimal reduction of cardiovascular risk. Purpose In this Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), we present a step by step approach to the diagnosis and practical management of statin intolerance resulting from muscle symptoms, and other adverse effects with demonstrated statin causality. Methods Relevant clinical evidence and international clinical guidelines were discussed and assimilated by ILEP members. Consensus was used to formulate recommendations for the diagnosis and management of statin intolerance. Results Consensus resulted in the adoption of three parts to the recommendation. 1) diagnosis of Statin Intolerance; 2) advice for management of all patients with statin intolerance; 3) specific advice for patients who have partial (rather than complete) statin intolerance. Patients with partial statin intolerance are likely to make up the vast majority (even 95%) of statin-intolerant individuals. Each part of the recommendation consists of a four-step process and has an associated acronym to aid memory (see attached recommendations). We adopted the Banach and Mikhailidis four-step approach to diagnosis and we developed novel recommendations for management. Summary of the ILEP SI recommendations. Conclusions We present recommendations, which will enable clinicians to distinguish between rare, severe adverse effects; true statin intolerance, and symptoms incorrectly attributed to statin therapy. In each case we summarize guidelines, clinical evidence and expert opinion pertaining to the optimal management of cardiovascular disease in these patients. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Introduction MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries) has been recently redefined by the last ESC guidelines. The aim of this study is to analyze clinical profile and long-term prognosis of these patients. Methods Retrospectively, between 1/2010 and 12/2016 all consecutive patients with the definitive diagnosis of MI in tertiary center were included in this observational study. Patients with unstable angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and those who died in-hospital were excluded. Patients were stratified according to the number of significant coronary vessel disease seen by coronary angiography into: 0 (MINOCA); 1; 2; ≥3 vessels. The definition of MINOCA was based on dedicated the 2016 ESC Working Group position paper. Patients with MINOCA were compared to their counterpounds (MIOCA; MI with obstructive CAD) regarding baseline clinical characteristics, on-admission and laboratory data and treatment at hospital discharge. The prognostic meaning of MINOCA vs MIOCA was ascertained by comparing the composite endpoint (re-ACS, stroke and death) rate among groups, using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results 13.8% (n=597) pts were classified as MINOCA. They were older and more frequently women than the obstructive group. MINOCA group also had a worse cardiovascular risk profile than pts with obstructive coronary lesions. They were associated more frequently with atrial fibrillation during hospitalization (11.2% vs. 6.8%, p During 15 months (IQR: 12,3–25,5), 613 (14.2) pts had a new ACS, stroke or died (251 pts developed a new ACS, 81 had stroke, and 281 died). The incidence of the composite endpoint was 4.2% in the MINOCA pts, 4.1% in pts with 1-significant coronary vessel disease, 6.3% in the 2-significant coronary vessel disease, and 9.5% in the ≥3-significant coronary vessel disease (p Figure 1. Composite endpoint Conclusions In the present cohort MINOCA was approximately found in one of each 14 patients admitted with MI. These patients had worse CV risk profile and more history of depression. MINOCA pts have similar prognostic impact in terms of hospitalization for a new ACS, stroke and death than the obstructive group.

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients represent a growing population with increasing use of acute emergency department (ED) care. Providing comprehensive ED care necessitates an understanding of the most common clinical scenarios to improve morbidity and mortality in this population. The aim of this position document is to provide a consensus regarding the management of the most common clinical scenarios of ACHD patients presenting to the ED.

Despite improvements in modern cardiovascular therapy, the morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF) remain significant in Europe and worldwide. Patients with IHD may benefit from therapies that would accelerate natural processes of postnatal collateral vessel formation and/or muscle regeneration. Here, we discuss the use of cells in the context of heart repair, and the most relevant results and current limitations from clinical trials using cell-based therapies to treat IHD and HF. We identify and discuss promising potential new therapeutic strategies that include ex vivo cell-mediated gene therapy, the use of biomaterials and cell-free therapies aimed at increasing the success rates of therapy for IHD and HF. The overall aim of this Position Paper of the ESC Working Group Cellular Biology of the Heart is to provide recommendations on how to improve the therapeutic application of cell-based therapies for cardiac regeneration and repair.

Increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease and new evidence on the effects of antithrombotic therapies have expanded the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. In addition, extremely low and high body weights have become more common due to frailty associated with ageing and to the global epidemic of obesity, ‘globesity’, respectively. These extreme body weights affect cardiovascular risk, including mortality, as well as the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of antithrombotic drugs, some of which have a relatively narrow therapeutic window. The ESC Working Group on Thrombosis therefore assembled a task group to examine the key issues related to this topic and to address the question of whether modified antithrombotic management strategies are required for patients at the extremes of body weight. Greater focus is directed toward to obesity, given its higher prevalence among patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complexities in terms of pharmacology and pathophysiology. Further research is warranted to optimize antithrombotic therapy in underweight as well as in different classes of obese patients, to guide dosing, dose-adjustment and/or reference intervals, and to establish whether the balance of benefits and risks of antithrombotic drugs can be improved.

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recently published practice guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (GUCH).1 For the sake of space, this document did not include recommendations for the organization of care for adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) nor for training in the subspecialty of adult CHD, although emphasis was given to their importance and the need for a separate recommendations paper in the future.1 This publication is a position paper from the ESC Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease, which makes recommendations for the standards and organization of care for adults with CHD, as well as for training in GUCH within Europe. Obviously, there is a lack of solid scientific data to support such recommendations and the majority of them must remain based on expert consensus. The remarkable improvement in survival of surgically and interventionally treated patients with CHD has led to an increasing number of GUCH patients, in particular those with more complex disease. There are also patients with newly diagnosed CHD lesions in adulthood such as atrial septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, Ebstein's anomaly and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. The 32nd Bethesda Conference report in 20012 estimated that there were ∼2800 adults with CHD/million population, with more than half having moderate or highly complex disease. More recently, Marelli et al .3 reported a prevalence of 4090/million adults in Quebec for the year 2000 with 380 having severe disease. In Europe, we are currently faced with an estimated GUCH patient population of ∼2.3 million, which significantly outnumbers the paediatric CHD population of ∼1.9 million patients.4 There is general agreement that GUCH patients have very special needs and therefore physicians responsible of their care need specific expertise and training.1–11 It is …

International audience; BACKGROUND: With an increasing prevalence of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD), a dedicated management approach is needed. The challenges encountered are manifold and include appropriate diagnosis and quantification of valve lesion, organization of adequate follow-up, and making the right management decisions, in particular with regard to the timing and choice of interventions. Data from the Euro Heart Survey have shown a substantial discrepancy between guidelines and clinical practice in the field of VHD and many patients are denied surgery despite having clear indications. The concept of heart valve clinics (HVCs) is increasingly recognized as the way to proceed. At the same time, very few centres have developed such expertise, indicating that specific recommendations for the initial development and subsequent operating requirements of an HVC are needed. AIMS: The aim of this position paper is to provide insights into the rationale, organization, structure, and expertise needed to establish and operate an HVC. Although the main goal is to improve the clinical management of patients with VHD, the impact of HVCs on education is of particular importance: larger patient volumes foster the required expertise among more senior physicians but are also fundamental for training new cardiologists, medical students, and nurses. Additional benefits arise from research opportunities resulting from such an organized structure and the delivery of standardized care protocols. CONCLUSION: The growing volume of patients with VHD, their changing characteristics, and the growing technological opportunities of refined diagnosis and treatment in addition to the potential dismal prognosis if overlooked mandate specialized evaluation and care by dedicated physicians working in a specialized environment that is called the HVC.

Udgivelsesdato: 2009-Jan-27 Oral antiplatelet drugs are a cornerstone of modern pharmacotherapy in cardiovascular atherothrombotic diseases. The efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) and clopidogrel in decreasing the risk of adverse events in coronary heart disease patients has been well established in the past 20 years. Despite chronic oral antiplatelet therapy, a number of atherothombotic events continue to occur. In recent years, a number of reports in the literature have shown possible relationships between residual platelet activity, as measured with a variety of laboratory tests, and clinical outcome, raising the possibility that 'resistance' to oral antiplatelet drugs may underlie many such clinical adverse events. The present position paper, conveyed within a group of clinical cardiologists with expertise in thrombosis appointed by the Section of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society, has been further elaborated and endorsed by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. It aims at summarizing the main findings in this complex area, issuing opinions in cases of high controversy, and fostering future research in this area to obtain reliable laboratory and clinical data for the resolution of the many problems still open.

The epidemic of obesity is recognized as one of the most important public health problems facing the world today. According to 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) data,1 39% of adults worldwide are overweight (body mass index, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and 13% of adults are obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Thus, more than half a billion adults worldwide are classified as obese. The prevalence of obesity varies by geographical region, gender and income level. The highest prevalence is found in the USA (61% overweight, 27% obese), closely followed by Europe (59% overweight, 23% obese), with the lowest prevalence in South–East Asia (22% overweight, and 5% obese). In Europe, the vast majority of countries have an overweight prevalence of more than 60%.1 Asians generally have a higher percentage of body fat than Caucasians of the same age, sex and BMI. Even below the usual cut-off of BMI = 25 kg/m2 Asian people seem to be at increased risk for type 2 diabetes.2 This may have implications for obesity diagnostic criteria. Indeed, the proposed optimal BMI cut-off values by WHO in Asian populations seems to vary from 22 to 25 kg/m2 based on the ethnic background. A Consensus Statement for Diagnosis of Obesity, Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome for Asian Indians has suggested the following BMI cut-off values: normal BMI = 18.0–22.9 kg/m2; overweight = 23.0–24.9 kg/m2; and obesity > 25 kg/m2.3 Thus it is indeed debatable whether uniform BMI cut-off values to diagnose obesity and/or for cardiovascular risk stratification purposes can be use worldwide. The use of additional anthropometric measurements e.g. waist-circumference or CT based quantification of abdominal/subcutaneous fat volume could help to better delineate obesity and risk parameters and to implement preventive strategies against obesity in each specific ethnic scenario.

2-D : two-dimensional 3-D : three-dimensional 5-FU : 5-fluorouracil ACE : angiotensin-converting enzyme ARB : angiotensin II receptor blocker ASE : American Society of Echocardiography BNP : B-type natriuretic peptide CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAD : coronary artery

Jose Zamorano discusses the need for and what cardiology can expect in the ESC position paper One of the changes that we have recently seen in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Core Curriculum, is the presence of a chapter entitled Cardio Oncology. Such topic has also been considered for an ESC Committee of Practice Guidelines position paper. We may wonder about the need for such a new topic. There is no doubt however that malignancy is a worldwide health and social problem. Advances in treatment have led to improved survival of cancer patients, but morbidity and mortality has also increased due to the side effects of treatment. This means that as survival rates in cancer patients improve, there is an increased interest in preventing or treating potential complications related to cancer therapies. If we look to the major potential side effects of anticancer drugs, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the most frequent complications that may lead to abandoning of the treatment. We need to differentiate cardiotoxicity (direct effects of the cancer treatment) to the new appearance of CVD due to accelerated development of CVD in …

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has important implications for the safety of participants in clinical trials and the research staff caring for them and, consequently, for the trials themselves. Patients with heart failure may be at greater risk of infection with COVID-19 and the consequences might also be more serious, but they are also at risk of adverse outcomes if their clinical care is compromised. As physicians and clinical trialists, it is our responsibility to ensure safe and effective care is delivered to trial participants without affecting the integrity of the trial. The social contract with our patients demands no less. Many regulatory authorities from different world regions have issued guidance statements regarding the conduct of clinical trials during this COVID-19 crisis. However, international trials may benefit from expert guidance from a global panel of experts to supplement local advice and regulations, thereby enhancing the safety of participants and the integrity of the trial. Accordingly, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology on 21 and 22 March 2020 conducted web-based meetings with expert clinical trialists in Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and Asia. The main objectives of this Expert Position Paper are to highlight the challenges that this pandemic poses for the conduct of clinical trials in heart failure and to offer advice on how they might be overcome, with some practical examples. While this panel of experts are focused on heart failure clinical trials, these discussions and recommendations may apply to clinical trials in other therapeutic areas.

Optimizing outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires balancing between the risks of thrombotic and bleeding events in individual patients.1–3 However, finding the optimal balance is not always straightforward since the risks of thrombotic and bleeding complications may differ extremely between individuals. In addition, the individual effects of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are not uniform in patients.4 Recent European guidelines1,3 recommend the use of prasugrel or ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel in all PCI-treated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without contraindication, acknowledging that laboratory assessment of P2Y12-receptor inhibition may be considered only in selected cases when clopidogrel is used.1 However, there is no guidance with respect to the appropriate methodology and the suggested interpretation of results. The Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology aimed to review the available evidence and the clinical relevance of platelet function testing in order to reach a consensus regarding the methodology, evaluation, and clinical interpretation of platelet function in patients undergoing PCI. Regarding the choice between available P2Y12-inhibitors, the 2011 ESC guidelines on non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS)1 and the 2012 guidelines on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction3 recommend prasugrel and ticagrelor for all ACS patients without contraindication, and clopidogrel is only recommended if these agents are not available. Despite the restrictive recommendations for clopidogrel, it still holds a class I indication in ACS due to the large differences in the availability of the new-generation P2Y12-inhibitors among European countries. According to the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guidelines for PCI,5 a P2Y12-inhibitor should be given for ACS patients without preferring novel P2Y12-inhibitors over clopidogrel. Similarly, the 2012 ACCF/AHA unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction guidelines6 and the 2013 ACCF/AHA ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines …

The management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)1 has evolved over the past century and particularly in the past 50 years. Important milestones include the development of the electrocardiogram, coronary care units, coronary angiography, reperfusion therapies, and troponin assays. These innovations are the foundation of contemporary AMI management strategies that include a diagnosis centred on elevated troponin values associated with corroborative clinical evidence,1 early use of coronary angiography, and reperfusion therapies.2–4 Pivotal in the evolution of these contemporary strategies were the early AMI coronary angiography studies undertaken by DeWood et al. These pioneering studies demonstrated that, in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), almost 90% had an occluded coronary artery provided that angiography was undertaken within 4 h of chest pain onset.5 In contrast, in AMI patients who did not present with ST elevation (non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or NSTEMI), only 26% had an occluded coronary artery when angiography was performed within 24 h of symptom onset.6 In both of these landmark studies,5,6 >90% of the acute MI patients had angiographic evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), underscoring the importance of the atherosclerotic process in the pathogenesis of AMI. Although DeWood's studies underscore the importance of obstructive CAD in AMI, it is fascinating that ∼10% had no significant CAD on coronary angiography. This is confirmed in several large AMI registries7–9 where 1–13% of AMI's occurred in the absence of obstructive CAD thereby eliciting an important set of questions—what is the mechanism of the myocardial damage in these patients? Do these patients differ from those with obstructive CAD? Should they be …

Bleeding is the main adverse effect when using oral anticoagulants (OACs). The risk of major bleeding with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is dependent on the quality of anticoagulation control and estimated to be ∼1.3/100 patients/year in patients with INR 2.0–3.0.1,2 Multiple limitations of VKAs stimulated the development of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) acting directly on coagulation factors, including factor FIIa (thrombin) and FXa. Pharmacological properties of the NOACs relevant for bleeding are summarized in the supplement including Supplementary material online, Table S1 and their main effects are summarized in Supplementary material online, Table S2 . The risk of bleeding in patients managed with NOACs was properly assessed in the four landmark Phase III trials in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF; Table 1 ). Major bleeding was the principal safety outcome in RE-LY,3,4 ARISTOTLE,5 and ENGAGE AF.6 In ROCKET-AF, the primary safety endpoint was the composite of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding.7 The risk of major bleeding was significantly reduced with dabigatran 110 mg b.i.d., apixaban and both doses of edoxaban3–6 while the bleeding rates for dabigatran 150 mg b.i.d. and rivaroxaban were similar to those with warfarin ( Table 1 ). View this table: Table 1 Risk of bleeding with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (rates per 100 patients-years) Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding accounts for ∼90% of major extracranial haemorrhages in patients with AF receiving VKAs.8 With the NOACs, dabigatran 150 mg b.i.d., rivaroxaban, and edoxaban 60 mg o.d. significantly increased rates of GI bleeding (∼1.5-fold) compared with warfarin.3,6,7 While rivaroxaban increases upper and lower GI bleeding …

Contains fulltext : 233788.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Women undergo important changes in sex hormones throughout their lifetime that can impact cardiovascular disease risk. Whereas the traditional cardiovascular risk factors dominate in older age, there are several female-specific risk factors and inflammatory risk variables that influence a woman's risk at younger and middle age. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and gestational diabetes are associated with a higher risk in younger women. Menopause transition has an additional adverse effect to ageing that may demand specific attention to ensure optimal cardiovascular risk profile and quality of life. In this position paper, we provide an update of gynaecological and obstetric conditions that interact with cardiovascular risk in women. Practice points for clinical use are given according to the latest standards from various related disciplines (Figure 1).

Background Observational studies evaluating the link between sleep duration and kidney function reported controversial results. In the present study, Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis was applied to obtain unconfounded estimates of the casual association of genetically determined sleep duration with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods Data from the largest genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on self-reported and accelerometer derived sleep duration, eGFR and CKD were analysed in total, as well as separately in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Inverse variance weighted method (IVW), weighted median (WM)-based method, MR-Egger, as well as MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (PRESSO) were applied. To rule out the impact of single single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), the leave-one-out method was used. Results Overall, individuals with genetically longer self-reported sleep duration had a higher CKD risk (IVW: beta=0.358, p=0.047). Furthermore, in non-diabetics, longer self-reported sleep duration was negatively associated eGFR (IVW: beta=−0.024, p=0.020). Similarly, accelerometer derived sleep duration was negatively related to eGFR in the total population (IVW: beta=−0.019, p=0.047) and the non-diabetic individuals (IVW: beta=−0.025, p=0.014) (Table). No significant association was found between self-reported sleep duration and eGFR in the whole population (IVW: beta=−0.019, p=0.072) and T2DM patients (IVW: beta=0.028, p=0.484). None of the estimated associations was subjected to a significant level of heterogeneity. Furthermore, MR-PRESSO analysis did not show any chance of outliers for all estimates. The pleiotropy test, with very negligible intercept and insignificant p value. The results of the MR-RAPS were identical with the IVW estimates, highlighting again no possibility of pleiotropy. The leave-one-out method demonstrated that the links were not driven by single SNPs. Conclusions For the first time, the present study shed a light on the potential harmful effects of longer sleep duration (measured both objectively and subjectively) on kidney function. This finding was observed in the total population and in non-diabetic individuals, but not in those with diabetes. Further research is needed to elucidate the links between sleep duration, eGFR and CKD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Aim To investigate the association of sinus heart rate pre- and post-ablation and recurrence rates in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods Between January 2012 and December 2017, data of 482 patients undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were included. All patients were followed-up for 12 months and were screened for any atrial tachyarrhythmia. Sinus heart rate measurements were recorded before (PRE), directly post ablation (POST) and 3 months post ablation (3M). Results In the total study population, the mean resting sinus heart rate at PRE (mean 57.9 bpm (95% CI, 57.1–58.7 bpm)) increased by over 10 bpm to POST (mean 69.4 bpm (95% CI, 68.5–70.3 bpm); p Conclusion Our study confirms the impact of PVI on cardiac autonomic function with a significant heart increase post-ablation. A heart rate ≥60bpm at 3M and a heart rate change ≥11 bpm (PRE to 3M) are associated with a favorable outcome in terms of recurrences. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): German Research Foundation

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a poorly recognized heart disease that was initially regarded as a benign condition. Recently, it has been shown that TTS may be associated with severe clinical complications including death and that its prevalence is probably underestimated. Since current guidelines on TTS are lacking, it appears timely and important to provide an expert consensus statement on TTS. The clinical expert consensus document part I summarizes the current state of knowledge on clinical presentation and characteristics of TTS and agrees on controversies surrounding TTS such as nomenclature, different TTS types, role of coronary artery disease, and etiology. This consensus also proposes new diagnostic criteria based on current knowledge to improve diagnostic accuracy. ispartof: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL vol:39 issue:22 pages:2032-2046 ispartof: location:England status: published

Tumours and heart disease remain the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Interestingly, in some countries—thanks to the enormous progress made in cardiology over the last decades—cancer has surpassed heart disease as the major cause of mortality.1 However, oncology has also seen an impressive expansion of its therapeutic options with the development of more effective chemotherapeutic drugs. Unfortunately, some chemotherapeutics, in particular anthracyclins, actually have toxic cardiovascular effects. Most commonly, they interfere with the myocardium, reduce cardiac pump function, and eventually induce heart failure, cause arrhythmias, or promote coronary lesion formation. As a result, many heart centres have established specialized units in cardio-oncology in order to improve the management of such patients. Thus, the Position Paper on Cardio-Oncology entitled ‘ 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity ’ by Zamorano et al. on behalf of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines and the Task Force for Cancer Treatments and Cardiovascular Toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology is a timely document.2 The …

Contains fulltext : 89482.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Cardiovascular remodelling in the conditioned athlete is frequently associated with physiological ECG changes. Abnormalities, however, may be detected which represent expression of an underlying heart disease that puts the athlete at risk of arrhythmic cardiac arrest during sports. It is mandatory that ECG changes resulting from intensive physical training are distinguished from abnormalities which reflect a potential cardiac pathology. The present article represents the consensus statement of an international panel of cardiologists and sports medical physicians with expertise in the fields of electrocardiography, imaging, inherited cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular pathology, and management of young competitive athletes. The document provides cardiologists and sports medical physicians with a modern approach to correct interpretation of 12-lead ECG in the athlete and emerging understanding of incomplete penetrance of inherited cardiovascular disease. When the ECG of an athlete is examined, the main objective is to distinguish between physiological patterns that should cause no alarm and those that require action and/or additional testing to exclude (or confirm) the suspicion of an underlying cardiovascular condition carrying the risk of sudden death during sports. The aim of the present position paper is to provide a framework for this distinction. For every ECG abnormality, the document focuses on the ensuing clinical work-up required for differential diagnosis and clinical assessment. When appropriate the referral options for risk stratification and cardiovascular management of the athlete are briefly addressed. 01 januari 2010

Aims To compare the efficacy [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering] and safety of alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, compared with ezetimibe, as add-on therapy to maximally tolerated statin therapy in high cardiovascular risk patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolaemia. Methods and results COMBO II is a double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, 104-week study of alirocumab vs. ezetimibe. Patients ( n = 720) with high cardiovascular risk and elevated LDL-C despite maximal doses of statins were enrolled (August 2012–May 2013). This pre-specified analysis was conducted after the last patient completed 52 weeks. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (plus oral placebo) or oral ezetimibe 10 mg daily (plus subcutaneous placebo) on a background of statin therapy. At Week 24, mean ± SE reductions in LDL-C from baseline were 50.6 ± 1.4% for alirocumab vs. 20.7 ± 1.9% for ezetimibe (difference 29.8 ± 2.3%; P < 0.0001); 77.0% of alirocumab and 45.6% of ezetimibe patients achieved LDL-C