Search

Purpose: To evaluate functional results of facial nerve repair by direct nerve suture or grafting, compare results between a traumatic and a tumoral group and identify prognostic factors. Methods: A retrospective monocentric cohort study was studied in a university ENT department. Thirty-one patients who benefited from facial nerve suture or grafting, with at least 12 months postoperative follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the lesion type: traumatic (accident of the public road or iatrogenic) and tumoral. Preoperative data studied were sex, side, etiology documented by CT and/or MRI, facial palsy duration and grade according to House Brackmann grading system. Intraoperative data included: surgeon, age of patient, surgical technique, graft type, use of biological glue, facial nerve derivation, lesioned site. Postoperative data included: histological diagnosis, radiotherapy history, time to onset of the first signs of reinnervation, follow-up duration, and final facial function. Results: Success rate, including grade III and IV, was 68% in the whole cohort, 79% in the traumatic group and 59% in the tumoral group. Patients presenting with facial palsy evolving less than 6 months had better recovery results than those evolving longer than 6 months (p = 0.02). No other prognostic factors were identified. Conclusions: The best outcome that can be achieved by suture or grafting of the facial nerve in traumatic or tumoral lesions is a grade III. Preoperative facial palsy duration is a prognostic factor and must be considered when establishing an operative indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oro-facial myofunctional praxis assesses the muscular coordination and the degree of motor impairment of the lingual, mandibular and facial muscles necessary for articulation, mimicry and swallowing. Purpose: The objective of this study was to create and validate the MBLF protocol, a French oro-facial myofunctional assessment in order to quantify patient's impairment and to specify the motor and functional deficit for an adapted management. Methods: The MBLF was validated against the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (criterion validity). The construct validity was tested by comparing healthy subjects (n = 102) from patients with facial palsy (n = 60). Internal and external consistency of face symmetry were reported. Normative data was provided. Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between the MBLF protocol and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System [F(59) = 310.51, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.843]. Significant differences were observed in Student's t test between healthy volunteers and patients with facial palsy [t(74.13) = 14,704, p < 0.001, r = 0.863]. A significant effect of the severity grades of facial palsy on the MBLF_TOTAL scores was found [F(158) = 268.469, p < 0.001]. The more severe the facial palsy, the lower the motor scores were. Conclusion: This MBLF French validation provides a baseline for comparing and quantifying the performance of subjects. The MBLF protocol is valid for assessing facial symmetry in peripheral facial palsy. A prospective study is needed to validate its role in dynamic evaluation of facial palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]