Search

Introduction: Amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) are the second most commonly consumed class of illicit drugs globally, but there is limited understanding of the precise factors associated with problematic versus controlled ATS consumption. This exploratory study aimed to identify which individual, social, and environmental factors are associated with different patterns of ATS use over time., Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Germany, England, The Netherlands, Poland, and the Czech Republic via face-to-face computer-assisted personal interviews to collect data on different user groups. 1,458 adults (18+) reported exposure to but no ATS use (n = 339); former rare/moderate ATS use (n = 242); current rare/moderate ATS use (n = 273); former frequent/dependent ATS use (n = 201); current frequent/dependent ATS use (n = 403). Extent of ATS/other substance use was assessed by number of consumption days (lifetime, past year, past month) and Severity of Dependence Scale. To identify factors associated with group membership, data were also collected on previous injecting drug use (IDU) and consumption setting/rules. Psychological distress was measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory, with additional data collected on self-reported adverse life events and physical/mental health., Results: Currently, using frequent/dependent ATS users experienced more frequent unstable living conditions (27.5%) and psychological distress (59.8%) compared to other groups. A multinomial logistic regression showed that currently abstinent rare/moderate users were more likely to abstain from methamphetamine use {odds ratio (OR) = 2.48 (confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-4.68)} and from IDU (OR = 6.33 [CI = 2.21-18.14]), to avoid ATS use during working hours (OR = 6.67 [CI = 3.85-11.11]), and not to use ATS for coping reasons (OR = 4.55 [CI = 2.50-6.67]) compared to the reference group of currently using frequent/dependent users., Conclusions: People who use ATS frequently and/or at dependent levels are more likely to have experienced social and economic adversity compared to infrequent ATS users. On the other hand, there is a substantial share of users, which show a controlled use pattern and are able to integrate ATS use into their lives without severe consequences., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: After rapidly opening up a low-threshold clinic to support heavily opioid-dependent persons at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020 in Hamburg (Germany), this non-interventional study evaluated the feasibility and short-term effects of opioid substitution treatment (OST). The low-threshold concept was customized for the pandemic situation and is the first of its kind in Germany., Methods: Patients who had already begun treatment were questioned in two assessments, at T1 shortly after beginning treatment and at T2 6 months later. The primary outcome criterion was their quality of life using the OSTQOL. Secondary criteria included retention rate, their mental and physical health (measured by the BSI-18 and the OTI Health Scale), social situation, drug use, COVID-19 status, and satisfaction with treatment., Results: Out of 84 patients included in the study, 51 participated in both assessments, resulting in a 6-month retention rate of 60.7%. 27.5% were females, and 72.5% were males. The feasibility question of the low-threshold OST clinic can clearly be answered positively. During the course of the study over 6 months, the situation mainly remained stable regarding quality of life, physical and mental health, and days of drug consumption. Patients significantly reduced the time they spent on the drug scene from 8.5 (SD = 7.56) to 6.1 (SD = 6.71) hours a day between the beginning of OST and T2 (p = 0.020). While 56.9% answered to be homeless at the beginning of OST, only 33.3% answered not to have found an accommodation by T2 (p = 0.012). The number of patients having contact to social workers increased from 51.0% to 74.5% (p = 0.004). Almost 2 fifths of the patients took part in PCR testing for COVID-19 (that only being done if they had symptoms), and none of the tests were positive., Discussion/conclusions: Overall, the low-threshold OST clinic has been successfully implemented in order to help a vulnerable group of people navigate through a global pandemic and support the public health sector. Further conclusions on effects are limited by the short study period and the small number of patients, which calls for further research studies in a larger setting., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is the most common and most effective treatment option for persons with opioid use disorders (OUD). In Germany, the prescription of OAT medications is regulated by the Narcotic Drugs Prescription Ordinance. With the introduction of restrictions to contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the German OAT regulations have been amended to ensure a legal continuation of OAT for people with OUD. In this study, we aimed to examine the use of the OAT regulations in practice, the experience made by physicians prescribing OAT medications, and their perspective on OAT regulations., Methods: Between September and December 2021, a questionnaire on the current situation and potential changes in the provision of OAT during the COVID-19 pandemic was sent out to 2,416 German physicians prescribing OAT medications. Differences between physicians with and without addiction medicine certification were analyzed., Results: The response rate of physicians was 22.8%. Their average age was 57.4 (±10.1) years, and 62.3% were male. During the COVID-19 pandemic, take-home periods for stable patients have been extended by 48.2% of physicians, and 52.6% would like to maintain this prescribing practice in the future. Most physicians (71.6%) indicated that patients handled the extended take-home prescriptions predominantly responsibly. A total of 71.8% of the physicians generally did not use video consultation. A corona pandemic-related switch of the OST medication to depot buprenorphine injection did rather not occur, as 71.2% reported no patients treated with depot buprenorphine, and only 2.6% switched first-time or more patients to depot buprenorphine due to the COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusion: The corona situation opened up opportunities for physicians and patients and enabled change processes in OAT. Physicians had positive experiences implementing expanded take-home prescriptions for stable patients. Video contacts rarely took place, suggesting resistance to digital consultation. The number of depot buprenorphine prescriptions has not increased substantially since the pandemic's beginning and has remained at low levels. Further research is needed to assess to what extent the changes in OAT will be maintained over time and whether they will also lead to long-term benefits for OAT patients., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) are the second most commonly used class of illegal substances in Europe. Although concurrent substance use has been subject to research, little is known about associations between concurrent use of cocaine, alcohol, or cannabis and ATS dependence. We expect that the concurrent use of any of the substance, especially cannabis and cocaine, is associated with ATS dependence., Methods: Cross-sectional data were gathered within the European ATTUNE study in 2018/2019. Participants (N = 721) were asked about their consumption patterns and social, psychological, and economic situation. Multivariate logistic regressions were carried out for associations between ATS dependence and use combinations of frequent cocaine, alcohol, or cannabis, with the reference group of no frequent concurrent use (model 1). Model 2 calculated associations for ATS dependence with lifetime methamphetamine use for respective use combinations., Results: The study population was on average 28.9 years old (SD = 7.7), with the majority being male (63.5%). In model 1, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for frequent alcohol use was 0.70 (confidence interval [CI] 0.41-1.20). Similar results were shown for model 2 (aOR 0.82, CI 0.42-1.62). Frequent cannabis use significantly reduced the chance for ATS dependence by 50% in adjusted model 1 (aOR 0.50, CI 0.28-0.89) and by 62% in model 2 (aOR 0.38, CI 0.18-0.82). For frequent cocaine use, models 1 and 2 report an aOR at 1.37 (CI 0.58-3.25) and 2.39 (CI 0.77-7.43), although not statistically significant. Frequent users of all 3 substances had a significant 3-fold chance for ATS dependence (model 1: aOR 2.98, CI 1.16-7.63; model 2: aOR 2.95, CI 1.02-8.58)., Discussion: Against initial hypotheses, frequent concurrent use of alcohol or cannabis generally decreased chances for ATS dependence. An explanation could be the study population, which consists of many irregular users of ATS, who mainly consume alcohol or cannabis. Cocaine generally increased chances, although results were not significant. The frequent use of all 3 substances together with ATS in the last year was significantly associated with dependence, thus reporting important information for treatment services. Further research is needed for disentangling causal relationships underlying these associations and for pinpointing consequences for relapse prevention and retention success., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Quality of life (QOL) of patients in opioid substitution treatment (OST) is increasingly being addressed in research. However, no disease- or treatment-specific instrument is available to assess the QOL of this target population. The purpose of this project was to develop the first QOL instrument for OST patients., Methods: Focus groups with 60 OST patients were analyzed using thematic analysis to elicit key QOL themes as perceived by patients. Identified themes were developed into items and refined through pilot testing and cognitive debriefing. The resulting 82 items were tested in a large sample of OST patients (n = 577). Principal component analysis with varimax rotation was performed to explore a possible factor structure and reduce the number of items. Psychometric properties were assessed., Results: Factor analysis revealed 6 subscales accounting for 46.1% of the variance: Personal Development, Mental Distress, Social Contacts, Material Well-being, Opioid Substitution Treatment, and Discrimination. The 38-item instrument demonstrated good to acceptable internal consistency reliability for all subscales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.75-0.88), and good convergent and discriminant validity., Conclusion: The Opioid Substitution Treatment Quality of Life scale (OSTQOL) is a multidimensional instrument with low respondent and administrator burden. A thorough validation is needed to assess its validity., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Many studies have examined factors associated with the first onset of cannabis use and abuse. Currently, there is relatively little research regarding conditions under which cannabis dependence is more likely to emerge. Although previous studies have examined different potential determinants of cannabis dependence, to our knowledge, a systematic review is lacking., Aims: The study aims to identify recent findings regarding psychosocial determinants of cannabis dependence and to summarize them systematically., Methods: A literature search in 4 databases - Embase, Medline, PsycINFO and PSYNDEX - was conducted. Searches were limited to publications between 2000 and April 2014, English and German as languages and humans as study subjects., Results: Our search detected a total of 10,568 studies. Twenty-six studies finally met inclusion criteria. Consumption patterns such as a regular cannabis use independent of social context and an early onset of use (11-15 years) were correlates of cannabis dependence. Moreover, early reactions to cannabis use and coping-oriented use motives explained additional variance. Stress factors and critical life events such as parental separation and early parental death as well as mental and social conflicts have also been linked with development of cannabis dependence. Additionally, comorbid mental disorders correlated with cannabis dependence., Conclusion: Numerous factors were shown to have an impact on transition to cannabis dependence. In particular, a wide range of mental disorders has been linked to an elevated risk of becoming dependent. The development of a dependence syndrome seems to be associated with diverse processes, in which social, biological and intra-individual factors interact in a complex manner. Nevertheless, the link between cannabis dependence and predisposing factors could not be resolved convincingly by most studies due to methodological weaknesses regarding dependence criteria., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Opioid maintenance treatment is the option of choice to stabilize opioid-dependent patients. Whilst efficacy of methadone and buprenorphine has been studied extensively, fewer data on slow-release oral morphine are available., Aims: This study analyzes the effects of slow-release oral morphine compared to methadone with regard to self-reported mental symptoms, drug use and satisfaction with treatment., Methods: The study was carried out as an open-label randomized crossover trial in 14 treatment sites in Switzerland and Germany. It comprised 2 crossover periods of 11 weeks each. For measuring mental symptoms, the Symptom Checklist-27 (SCL-27) was used. Drug and alcohol use was assessed by the number of consumption days, and treatment satisfaction by a visual analogue scale., Results: A total of 157 patients were included for the analyses (per-protocol sample). Statistically significantly better outcomes for morphine as compared to methadone treatment were found for overall severity of mental symptoms (SCL-27 Global Severity Index), as well as 5 of the 6 syndrome groups of the SCL-27, and for treatment satisfaction. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to drug or alcohol use between groups., Conclusions: This study supports positive effects of slow-release oral morphine compared to methadone on patient-reported outcomes such as mental symptoms and treatment satisfaction with comparable effects on concomitant drug use. Slow-release oral morphine represents a meaningful alternative to methadone for treatment of opioid dependence., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: Studies on drug dependence show a high prevalence of comorbidity with additional mental disorders. Comorbidity patients also show more poly-substance use and other psychosocial problems. This study analyzed the importance of comorbidity for the long-term course of opiate dependence., Method: 350 opiate-dependent patients were examined at yearly follow-ups over 4 years using the EuropASI for the assessment of drug-related problems and the CIDI for diagnostic of psychiatric disorders. 196 patients were reached at final follow up (56%)., Results: Of the patients reached at final follow-up, 30% had severe, 29% mild and 41% no clinically relevant disorders at baseline. However, the linear relationship at baseline--the more severe the disorder, the greater the impairment through drug-related problems--was not present at final follow-up. The results show that lifetime diagnosis of mental disorder had no prognostic relevance for the long-term course of drug dependency., Conclusion: The assumption that opiate users with an additional mental disorder are more vulnerable in their course of addiction could not be confirmed., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

In order to describe the patterns of use in the open drug scene in Hamburg, a study was carried out among 616 drug users in the drug scene and in or in the vicinity of low-threshold institutions close to the drug scene in summer 2000. The special focus was on the prevalence of cocaine and crack use as well as on the utilisation of help services for drug users. 80% of the interviewed persons were male, the average age was 32.6 years. They had been using drugs such as heroin or cocaine for an average of 11 years. 84% had used heroin and 74% cocaine within the last 24 h. Use was intravenous for 66%. 57% used cocaine intravenously, the percentage of crack smokers was 22%. Compared to previous studies, an increase in cocaine use can be noted among the scene users in Hamburg, mainly related to intravenous cocaine use. Crack smoking has only increased slightly over the past few years. Based on cluster analysis, four consumption pattern groups can be established. The largest group (38%) mainly uses cocaine and heroin. The second group (26%) consists of polyvalent drug consumers using methadone in addition to heroin and cocaine, as well as, partially, benzodiazepines, cannabis or alcohol. Group 3 (19%) mainly uses heroin only, some of them also using methadone and/or cannabis. The fourth group (17%) is mainly related to alcohol, the greater part of them additionally using heroin. On the whole, it appears that those users who currently do not use cocaine (or crack) are in a better health and social situation. The group using only heroin (cluster 3) also compares favourably with the other three consumption pattern groups with regard to the intensity of use, consumption in public and risk behaviour. Almost all the interviewed persons are in contact with general practitioners. However, the increasing cocaine use has not been met by sufficient intervention and treatment programmes so far., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The present study investigates whether a correlation exists between mental symptoms and opiate dependency. During a 5-year follow-up study in Hamburg, of 350 opiate addicts who were in contact with the help system at the time of the initial investigation, 219 (63%) could be interviewed three times at 1-year intervals. The investigation instruments were standardized questionnaires such as EuropASI, CIDI, SCL-90-R and BDI. The general life situation of the investigated persons had, on the whole, improved in the course of the last 2-3 years. Drug consumption had markedly decreased. One third of the opiate addicts were in a comparatively good mental condition on all three survey interviews, for 17% there was a worsening of the condition, and for another 17% the negative mental condition was reinforced. A correlation can be established between mental disorders/symptoms and drug addiction or drug-related problems. The more unfavorable the course of the mental symptoms, the greater the problems of the client's current life situation. There is also an overall relationship between increased drug consumption and mental symptoms like depressivity and anxiety, and the psychosocial functioning level. However, the expected correlations between mental disorders and the extent of drug consumption are not very marked. This indicates that specific constellations of drug consumption and mental disorders are not isolated but are related, as elements of a complex behavioral pattern, to the development of other life areas of the client.