Search

Salvage endoscopic therapy, including endoscopic resection (ER) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Resection with pathologically vertical margin-negative (VM0) for ER and local complete response (L-CR) for PDT are important surrogate prognostic markers for each therapy's efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic therapy in local failure after CRT for ESCC.We included patients who underwent EUS followed by ER or PDT for local failure after CRT or radiotherapy for ESCC from 2006 to 2020. We evaluated EUS findings associated with VM0 resection for ER and L-CR for PDT, which included the status of the outermost part of the submucosal layer, tumor thickness, and tumor invasion length into the muscularis propria (MP) layer.Thirty and 47 patients were enrolled into the ER and PDT groups, respectively. The VM0 resection rate in the ER group was 87% (26/30). The EUS findings associated with VM0 resection were tumor thickness 2.3 mm (p = 0.01) and preserved hyperechoic line of the outermost part of the submucosa layer (p 0.01). The L-CR rate in the PDT group was 69% (32/47). The EUS findings associated with L-CR were tumor thickness 5.0 mm (p 0.01) and tumor invasion length into the MP layer 1.6 mm (p = 0.03).EUS can be useful in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic treatment for local failure after CRT for ESCC.

The traction assisted (TA) method has reduced the technical difficulty associated with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear which factors associated with difficulty have been improved by the TA-ESD method. We aimed to evaluate and compare difficulty factors between conventional and TA-ESD.We retrospectively enrolled patients treated by ESD from Apr 2010 to Jun 2014 for the conventional ESD cohort and from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 for the TA-ESD cohort. Difficult cases were defined as; (1) ≥ 120 min ESD procedure time, (2) intraoperative perforation, or (3) piecemeal resection. We explored and compared the factors associated with technical difficulty in each cohort.The conventional and TA-ESD cohorts included 285 (299 lesions) and 387 (421 lesions) patients, respectively. For difficult cases, the conventional and TA-ESD cohorts had 91 (30%) and 71 (17%) lesions, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that ≥ 30 mm lesion length (odds ratio (OR) 6.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-13.50), lower esophagus (OR 2.37, 95% Cl 1.34-4.21), 1/2 circumference (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.99), and left wall (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.20) in the conventional ESD cohort, and ≥ 30 mm lesion length (21.30, 95% CI 4.75-95.30), lower esophagus (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.52-6.13), and 1/2 circumference (OR 6.40, 95% CI 3.06-13.40) in the TA-ESD cohort, were independently associated with technical difficulty.TA-ESD can reduce the difficulty in cases including lesions in the left wall; however, cases in the lower esophagus and large lesions were still difficult to simplify.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is reportedly the reliable modality to predict the depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), however, most previous studies are retrospective or single-centered. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional endoscopy and EUS using the data from a multicenter prospective study of endoscopic resection (ER) followed by chemoradiotherapy for cSM1-2N0M0 ESCC (JCOG0508). All lesions were evaluated as cSM cancer with both conventional endoscopy and EUS before enrollment and judged as cSM1 or cSM2 in real time. We compared the clinical and pathological diagnoses for tumor depth and assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) for pSM (pSM/cSM) as the primary endpoint. We also investigated the clinical factors affecting the pathological depth of SM. 175 lesions were examined, and clinical diagnosis was SM1 in 114 and SM2 in 61 lesions. The pathological diagnoses of the epithelium, lamina propria mucosa, muscularis mucosae, SM1, and SM2 were 3, 31, 55, 17, and 69. The PPV for pSM was 49.1% (86/175) in all lesions, 34.2% (39/114) in cSM1 lesions, and 77.0% (47/61) in cSM2 lesions. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that cSM2 (vs. cSM1, OR 6.79) was an independent clinical factor associated with pSM. While the accurate depth diagnosis in cSM ESCC was difficult to make, the clinical diagnosis of SM2 with both conventional endoscopy and EUS was significantly associated with pSM. Furthermore, diagnostic ER could be recommended to confirm the pathological diagnosis especially in cSM1 lesions with both conventional endoscopy and EUS.

Gastric cancer is the most frequent primary cancer-associated with esophageal cancer and is most commonly detected by endoscopic surveillance. However, the clinical features of synchronous or metachronous gastric cancer that could be detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in esophageal cancer patients are unknown. We reviewed the clinical records of all esophageal cancer patients (n = 1379) registered in the cancer registration database who underwent initial treatment between April 2010 and October 2015. We retrospectively analyzed the proportions of synchronous and metachronous gastric cancer cases, the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous gastric cancer in total and by esophageal cancer treatments (endoscopic resection, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy), and the clinical features of esophageal cancer patients with synchronous or metachronous gastric cancer. Overall, 67 (5.3% of 1275) esophageal cancer patients with synchronous gastric cancer and 40 (5.1% of 791) esophageal cancer patients with metachronous gastric cancer were analyzed. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of metachronous gastric cancer was 5.6% in total, 7.8% after endoscopic resection, 4.7% after esophagectomy, and 4.1% after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. From the results of multivariate analysis, the risk factors for synchronous gastric cancer were male (odds ratio 13.3) and moderate/severe atrophic gastritis (odds ratio 17.9), and the risk factor of metachronous gastric cancer was moderate/severe atrophic gastritis (hazard ratio 27.6) in patients with esophageal cancer. The incidence rates of synchronous and metachronous gastric cancer with esophageal cancer were both over 5%. Careful endoscopic observation is required for moderate and severe atrophic gastritis at detecting concomitant gastric cancer in esophageal cancer patients.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) with concurrent chemotherapy is promising for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of study was to evaluate the outcome of concurrent chemo-proton therapy (CCPT), i.e., PBT with concurrent chemotherapy for cT1 ESCC and the salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrence. Patients with clinical T1 ESCC who underwent CCPT (60 GyE) between April 2013 and April 2017 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were investigated. The efficacy of CCPT at the primary site was evaluated via endoscopy; primary complete response (CR) was defined as disappearance of the tumor lesion/ulcer and absence of cancer cells on biopsy. Endoscopic evaluation was performed with the same protocol of conventional chemoradiotherapy. Local recurrence after CCPT was treated with endoscopic resection for cT1a and with esophagectomy or photodynamic therapy for cT1b+. Of the 44 patients (median age, 70 years) that underwent CCPT, 43 patients (98%) achieved primary CR. Among the 44 patients, the 3-year overall survival rate was 95.2%. Five patients (11%) developed local recurrence without regional lymph node or distant metastasis and received endoscopic resection or photodynamic therapy. All five patients were alive with no recurrence after a median 23 months. The results suggest that CCPT is an effective treatment for cT1 ESCC and careful endoscopic follow-up allows preferable local control with salvage endoscopic treatment.