Search

This paper aims to compare different heterogeneous test designs from the perspective of the confidence interval quantification of inversely identified parameters, where the influence of a DIC optical system systematic and random error are taken into account. Because the errors in optical measurement can arise from many reasons and sources, our methodology relies on the system's errors determined from initial sets of pictures acquired at the load-free state for hundreds of specimens (over 850 tests over the past three years). In this way, a prior probability distribution of systematic and random error, arisen from the system initial settings and testing procedures are determined. Further, by conducting an inverse identification procedure of linear orthotropic elastic material parameters, the influence of the error distributions is studied for different types of heterogeneous specimens. The presented methodology determines the DIC bias and random error propagation through the inverse identification procedure to individual parameters. For each specimen design, confidence intervals of identified material parameters were determined. The results show the appropriateness of a specimen design for the identification of particular material parameters.