Search

A critical response to the article “Relativismus und Menschenrechte” by Marie-Luisa Frick, published in this issue of the journal, is presented. The author addresses several issues, including the philosophy of human rights from the perspectives of cultural relativism and universalism, the distinction between idea and content, and political ethics.

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents the author's views on the philosophy of mathematics with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The starting point of Kanitscheider's paper is that naturalism and the ontological Platonism are the topic of discussions in today's position of scientific knowledge. According to the author, the limitation on naturalism and Platonism narrows Kanitscheider’s argumentation in significant way.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. In his paper, Kanitscheider wants to prove that naturalism and Platonism are agreeable to each other in the context of the existence of mathematical objects. However, the author disagrees with Kanitscheider's explanation of naturalism as a development of empiricism.

The article presents the author's comments on sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a power theory for the state and constitution. Various problems of arrangement referred by Maurer in her paper are discussed. The concept of power given by sociologists Max Weber and Thomas Hobbes is referred.

The article presents the author's comments on sociologist S.N. Eisenstadt's research paper in which he analyzes the relation between power and culture in society. The concept of public spheres in society presented by Eisenstadt in his paper is discussed. Eisenstadt's concept of power is compared with that of sociologist Karl Marx's power theory.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. In his paper, Kanitscheider has attempted to defend one kind of Platonism, which should be compatible with the naturalism of natural sciences. The particular kind of so-called realism in mathematics, which Kanitscheider has referred to, is American logician Willard van Orman Quine's supposed realism.

The article presents the author's views on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, Kanitscheider’s work occupies itself with the question of compatibility of naturalism with the platonic interpretation of mathematics. The idea associated with Kanitscheider's paper is that the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, together with the axiom of choice, describes the culminative quantity hierarchy in an obvious manner.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, the paper which is based on the naturalized theory of cognition, adapts to the modern developments in mathematical physics and set theory. The second part of the paper talks about the empirical anchorage of scientific theories under the representation of American logician Willard van Orman Quine as confusing.

The article presents the author's criticism on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The objective of the first part of Kanitscheider’s paper is the clarification of the term naturalism which the author believes that one looks for a clear conceptual explanation in vain. The second part of the paper, the author argues, concerns itself only with the compatibility of naturalism with a few basic principles of modern mathematics.

The article presents the author's comments on sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. The ambiguity in domination theory proposed by Maurer is referred. Lack of classification of actors in the work of Maurer is criticized. The concept of idealization and ideal types in the paper of Andrea Maurer is discussed.

The article focuses on issues related to domination in the modern society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. The concept of power presented by Maurer in her research paper is highlighted. Maurer refers to the works of sociologists Max Weber and Thomas Hobbes to describe the concept of domination.

The article presents the author's views on sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. Dualism in the meaning of the title of her research paper is discussed. According to the author, Maurer wants to lay the basis for an integrative research program through the reconstruction of domination theory.

The article discusses the need for legitimatization of domination force in the society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. Maurer's basic concept of power is criticized. According to the author, no differentiation is made between governmental domination and private power exercise by Maurer in her paper.

The article presents the author's comments on a paper related to applied psychology by Emil Schmalohr. The paper discusses several problems related to psychoanalysis and self-realization ability of psychiatric patients. Schmalohr has also explained the concept of emotions which comprise of both conscious as well as unconscious processes.

The article criticizes a paper on human chromosome decoding by researcher Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski and his colleagues of the University of Applied Sciences, Germany. In their paper, the researchers have also discussed the possible effects of the broader implementation of genetic research in socio-political connections. The suitability of genetic research into a new paradigm has opened the view to reflect the consequences of genetic interferences.

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Erwägen Wissen Ethik is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents the author's response to the comments on his paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme." According to the author, the variations of the opinions on his essay on naturalism and the fundamentals of mathematics have exceeded all his expectations. He says that the last bastions of anti-naturalism should be searched in the status of the formal structure of the nature, which permits a successful application of mathematics in the world.

The article presents the author's views on the wonders of naturalism with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The author states that naturalism is presently the dominating interpretation in the analytical philosophy. And it professes itself to epistemological realism because this is the only position, which can actually explain the success of science.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The author discusses naturalistic reality of relations with reference to Kanitscheider's work. The author attempts to show that Kanitscheider could have led to a completely different path if one documents words like naturalism and Platonism differently.

The article presents the author's views on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, this work has two orientations. On one side it relates itself especially to the results of biology, mathematics and physics. On the other side, there is willingness for conceptual revolutions in physics.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, the biggest problem for a naturalist lies in the timeless subject matters of mathematics and its ontological interpretation as a kind of Platonic world of ideas. The author further argues that the concept of religion, which Kanitscheider has used to argue on naturalism, is exceptionally deficit.

The article presents the author's views on Platonism in mathematics with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. Kanitscheider begins with mathematical Platonism more exactly from universe of all pure quantities, without sufficiently clarifying the problems with this perception. He has also not mentioned that the ontology required for metamathematics must always be more extensive than the mathematical ontology.

The article discusses issues related to the concept of domination in society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. Maurer's consideration of sociologist Max Weber's "assumed collective legitimization acknowledgement" as doubtful idealization is discussed. The domination sociology theory proposed by Maurer is referred.

The article discusses issues related to domination in society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. The theoretical and practical form of the domination concept is examined. Influence of the classical works of sociologist Max Weber and Thomas Hobbes on the Maurer's domination theory is discussed.

The article discusses issues related to the concept of domination in society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. Maurer's domination theory in the rational framework is discussed. Maurer's study of different traditions of domination theory in an integrative research program is criticized.

The article focuses on issues related to the problem of domination in the modern society with reference to sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. Maurer's sociological power theory is compared with that proposed by sociologist Max Weber. Maurer's dualism of individual action rights and complex domination conceptions referred.

The article presents the author's comments on sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a sociological power theory. The notion of power given by Maurer is referred. The strategic difference between power and authority presented by Maurer is discussed. The relation between power and violence presented by Maurer is highlighted.

The article presents the author's comments on sociologist Andrea Maurer's research paper in which she proposes a power theory for the state and constitution. Sociologist Max Weber's oriented sociology of power and rational-choice-approach are compared. The action theories proposed by Maurer in here work are discussed.

Presents a reply of the article author to the comments made by several social scientists on his paper about the equality and analogy between the evolution of biological systems and the development of social systems. Remarks of the author on the criticisms of scientists on the topic of analogy; Comments on the need of differentiation between analogy and homology in biology; Issues related to the relation between culture and society.

Presents a reply of the article author to the comments made by several social scientists on his paper on various issues related to the classical utopia concept. Explanation of the present conditions of the utopia discussion in the Federal Republic of Germany; Issues related to utopian thinking; Information on the tasks of fathering, food and education in the utopian society.

Presents replies of the article author to comments made by several social scientists on his papers on various issues related to applied ethics. Information on research ethics committees; View that these social scientists do not often take into ground realities into consideration before passing judgments; Discussion on systematic reflection about "morality."

The article presents the author's views on Platonism in applied mathematics with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. In his paper, Kanitscheider has showed with example that mathematics in the period of the theory of quantity has promoted the Platonist interpretations. However, in the author's opinion, it is only a banal view.

The article presents the author's comment on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The author discusses naturalism in the context of the principle of ontological thriftiness. According to the author, Kanitscheider has delivered an amusing and diverse presentation of contemporary naturalism in the philosophy of sciences in his paper.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The author discusses the soundness of Kanitscheider's concept of naturalism and its compatibility with mathematics. In his paper, Kanitscheider has also discussed the concept of Platonism in mathematics.

The article presents the author's views on mathematical naturalism with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, Kanitscheider has steered his observations in a right way beyond the methodology of the ontological obligations of naturalism. Kanitscheider has further explained the theory of Platonism in mathematics given by American logician Willard van Orman Quine.

The article presents the author's views on the naturalization of mathematical knowledge with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, Kanitscheider has suggested ontological disposition as a solution in mathematics. He has discussed three types of ontological realism which include strong ontological realism, weak ontological realism, and holism.

The article presents the author's views on naturalism with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. From the author's point of view, every natural science, even mathematics and informatics can offer comprehensive explanation of the world, and everyone thereby can describe all the phenomena with the use of their current languages.

The article presents the author's views on the untenability of naturalism with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, Kanitscheider's naturalism is not scientifically tenable. Kanitscheider has defended a realistic interpretation of transfinite cardinal numbers. The author here argues that cardinal numbers are always numbers of quantities.

The article presents the author's comments on the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernaulf Kanitscheider. According to the author, Kanitscheider has tried to bring harmony in the relationship between Platonism and the nature of mathematical objects. He has done this using the ontology of famous mathematicians like George Putnam and Willard van Orman Quine.

The article presents the author's views on the context of universe of quantity with reference to the paper titled "Naturalismus und logisch-mathematische Grundlagenprobleme," by Bernulf Kanitscheider. The author is of the opinion that in the context of mathematical research new objects are always devised and investigated, so in this sense mathematics develops itself. The essential drive for the expansion of mathematical concept and method apparatus is the knowledge.