1. Predicting seizure freedom with AED treatment in newly diagnosed patients with MRI-negative epilepsy: A large cohort and multicenter study
- Author
-
Na Wang, Yan Bai, Xiong Han, Jiao Zeng, Xue-rui Zhu, Ming-min Li, Yi Chen, Guinv He, Enfeng Wang, Shijun Yang, Pan Zhao, Wenwu Chen, Ting Zhao, Renjun Gu, Yuan Fang, Yanan Chen, Jiu‐yan Han, and Bing-qian Ma
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Multivariate statistics ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Electroencephalography ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,Behavioral Neuroscience ,Epilepsy ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Pregnancy ,Seizures ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Retrospective Studies ,Univariate analysis ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Seizure freedom ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Treatment Outcome ,Neurology ,Cohort ,Anticonvulsants ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective We developed and validated a prediction score for predicting the probability of 6-month and 12-month seizure freedom of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in newly diagnosed patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative epilepsy. Methods The development cohort included 543 consecutive patients from the Epilepsy Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, while the validation cohorts included 493 consecutive patients in two independent cohorts. Univariate analysis and a forward and backward elimination of multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to select predictive factors. The performance of the score was evaluated with C-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The risk stratification was also performed. Results The score included five routinely available predictors including Circadian rhythms, Electroencephalography before AED treatment, Neuropsychiatric disorders, Perinatal brain injury, and History of central nervous system infection (CENPH score). When applied to the external validation cohort, the score showed good discrimination with C-index (development group: 0.83; validation group: 0.78), and calibration plots indicated well calibration, as well as the decision curve analysis showed good predictive accuracy and clinical values in four cohorts. The points of the score were categorized to the following three probability levels for predicting seizure freedom: high probability (0–83.11 points), medium probability (83.11–122.71 points), and low probability (> 122.71 points). And online calculator was established to make this score easily applicable in clinical practice. Conclusions We established a simple, practical, and evidence-based prediction score for predicting seizure freedom with AEDs to aid in the clinical consultation and treatment decision for the newly diagnosed patients with MRI-negative epilepsy.
- Published
- 2020