Search

Purpose: To study course and outcome of epilepsy in children having had a status epilepticus (SE) as the presenting sign or after the diagnosis., Methods: A total of 494 children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, aged 1 month through 15 years, were followed prospectively for 5 years., Results: A total of 47 Children had SE. Forty-one of them had SE when epilepsy was diagnosed. For 32 (78%), SE was the first seizure. SE recurred in 13 out of 41 (32%). Terminal remission at 5 years (TR5) was not significantly worse for these 41 children: 31.7% had a TR5 <1 year versus 21.2% of 447 children without SE. They were not more often intractable. Five out of six children with first SE after diagnosis had a TR5 <1 year. Mortality was not significantly increased for children with SE. Independent factors associated with SE at presentation were remote symptomatic and cryptogenic etiology, and a history of febrile convulsions. Children with first SE after inclusion more often had symptomatic etiology., Conclusions: Although we find a trend for shorter TR5 in children with SE at presentation, outcome and mortality are not significantly worse. Etiology is an important factor for prognosis. Children with SE during the course of their epilepsy have a worse prognosis and a high recurrence rate of SE. This outcome is not due to the SE itself, but related to the etiology and type of epilepsy. The occurrence of SE is just an indicator of the severity of the disease.

Purpose: To validate two prognostic models for childhood-onset epilepsy designed to predict a terminal remission of <6 months at 2 years after diagnosis in children referred to the hospital., Methods: A hospital-based cohort of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy was recruited and followed up for 2 years to validate previously developed models. One model was based on variables collected at intake, and the other was based on intake variables plus variables collected during the first 6 months of follow-up. The accuracy of both models was estimated by measuring the area under the receiver-operant-characteristic curves (ROC area)., Results: The ROC area of the model developed with intake variables was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.74] for the original cohort and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69) for the validation cohort. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the original cohort was 61.6% and 69.1%, whereas it was 60.0% and 61.4% for the validation cohort. For the model with intake and 6-month variables combined, the ROC area was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) for the original cohort and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.78) for the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity were 72.6% and 73.1%, respectively, for the original cohort and 67.4% and 60.2%, respectively, for the validation cohort., Conclusions: Although both models predict outcome better than chance, they are insufficiently accurate to be of practical value. Both models performed marginally less well with the validation cohort than with the original cohort, but in both instances, the model based on intake and 6-month variables was more accurate.

The diagnosis of a first seizure or epilepsy may be subject to interobserver variation and inaccuracy with possibly far-reaching consequences for the patients involved. We reviewed the current literature. Studies on the interobserver variation of the diagnosis of a first seizure show that such a diagnosis is subject to considerable interobserver disagreement. Interpretation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) findings is also subject to interobserver disagreement and is influenced by the threshold of the reader to classify EEG findings as epileptiform. The accuracy of the diagnosis of epilepsy varies from a misdiagnosis rate of 5% in a prospective childhood epilepsy study in which the diagnosis was made by a panel of three experienced pediatric neurologists to at least 23% in a British population-based study, and may be even higher in everyday practice. The level of experience of the treating physician plays an important role. The EEG may be helpful but one should be reluctant to make a diagnosis of epilepsy mainly on the EEG findings without a reasonable clinical suspicion based on the history. Being aware of the possible interobserver variation and inaccuracy, adopting a systematic approach to the diagnostic process, and timely referral to specialized care may be helpful to prevent the misdiagnosis of epilepsy.

Purpose: To assess the prognosis and the accuracy of the epilepsy classification in young children with nonsymptomatic generalized epilepsy., Methods: Of the cohort of the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood (n = 466), all children younger than 6 years with a diagnosis of idiopathic (IGE) or cryptogenic (CGE) generalized epilepsy either at intake (n = 108) and/or after 2 years of follow-up (n = 102) were included. The number of reclassifications after 2 years was determined, and the reasons for reclassification were analyzed. All children receiving a diagnosis of IGE or CGE at 2 years were followed up for 5 years to study their outcome in terms of terminal remission (TR). Data on their level of intellectual functioning were collected at the start of this analysis., Results: The epilepsy syndrome was reclassified in 17 children. In 14 of them, the seizure type also was reclassified, and in three, the course of the epilepsy determined the new epilepsy type. Two other children had a reclassification of their seizure types without a change of the epilepsy type. Many children were categorized as having IGE not otherwise specified. In all probability, this is a heterogeneous group, containing patients with various epilepsy syndromes, with generalized tonic-clonic seizures as a common hallmark. Of the 102 children with IGE or CGE at 2 years of follow-up, 75% had a TR of >6 months after 2 years, and 85% a TR of >or=1 year after 5 years., Conclusions: In a fair proportion of children with nonsymptomatic generalized epilepsy in this age group, it is not possible to classify firmly the epilepsy and/or the seizures immediately after the intake. Instead, they are reclassified during the course of the disease. This and the apparent heterogeneity of the category IGE not otherwise specified point to inherent drawbacks of the current International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes. The prognosis of IGE at this young age is generally excellent.

Purpose: To examine which variables available early in the course of childhood epilepsy are associated with a poor short-term outcome and to develop models to predict such an outcome., Methods: We prospectively followed up 466 children with newly diagnosed epilepsy for 2 years. Variables were collected at intake and after 6 months. Outcome was defined as the duration of the terminal remission (TR): poor (<6 months) and not poor (> or =6 months)., Results: Of the subjects, 31% had a poor outcome. Multivariate analysis based on the intake variables identified number of seizures, seizure type, and etiology as risk factors for a poor outcome. With the intake and 6-month variables combined, seizure type, etiology, the number of seizures, and not attaining a 3-month remission during these 6 months, and the EEG at 6 months were predictive variables. A predictive model based on the multivariate logistic-regression analysis with the intake variables was correct in 56% of the children in whom it predicted a poor outcome and in 73% of the children in whom it predicted a not-poor outcome. With the intake and 6-month variables together, these percentages were 66 and 79%, respectively. The sensitivity of these models was low (29 and 47%, respectively); the specificity was good (90 and 89%)., Conclusions: The 2-year outcome of childhood epilepsy is closely related to its early course. The prognosis is poor in approximately 30% of patients. By using our data, the prediction of a poor outcome is correct in almost two thirds of the patients; however, the models produce many false-negative predictions.

Purpose: To study the familial occurrence of epilepsy in children with newly diagnosed multiple unprovoked seizures., Methods: Between August 1988 and September 1992, 462 children with two or more unprovoked seizures were included in the prospective Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood. Seizures and epilepsy syndromes of probands were classified according to the International Classifications. Probands with at least 1 first-degree relative with epilepsy were selected. Seizures and syndromes of their relatives were classified using medical files and telephone interviews., Results: In 42% of the probands, the epilepsy was classified as localization-related, in 57% as generalized, and in 1% as undetermined whether focal or generalized. The 47 (10.2%) children with at least 1 first-degree relative with epilepsy less frequently had localization-related epilepsy (23%) and more often had generalized epilepsy (77%) as compared with the total group of probands. Fifty-eight first-degree and 21 other relatives had epilepsy. Thirty-three of the 40 (83%) first-degree relatives with idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy had the same seizure type as the proband, but detailed information about their seizures was sometimes difficult to obtain. Of the 12 first-degree relatives with epilepsy syndromes classifiable according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 7 (58%) had the same syndrome as the proband., Conclusions: In 10% of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, the condition is familial. Relatively more often, these children have generalized epilepsy syndromes as compared with children with a negative family history. Most of the relatives with idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy had the same seizure type as the proband. These findings confirm the role of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of epilepsy.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic yield of a repeated EEG (REPEEG) after partial sleep deprivation (SD) in children and adolescents with one or more seizures who previously had had a standard EEG (STDEEG) without epileptiform abnormalities (EAs). In the literature, 32-75% of such REPEEGs after SD were reported to show EA., Methods: In a prospective, multicentred study, we selected children aged 1 month to 16 years with one or more idiopathic or remote symptomatic newly diagnosed seizures. A REPEEG was recorded in children without EAs in their STDEEG., Results: Of 552 children and adolescents who entered the study, 243 (44%) had a STDEEG without EAs. In 177 (73% of eligible children), REPEEGs were recorded after SD. We found EAs in 61 (34.5%) REPEEGs and new nonepileptiform abnormalities in five (1%). In 552 children in the total cohort, the REPEEG thus added 11% with EAs to the 56% with EAs in the STDEEG. Of REPEEGs, 81% included sleep compared with 20% of STDEEGs. In about half the REPEEGs, EAs occurred during sleep only. One child had tonic-clonic seizures probably related to the SD., Conclusions: One third of REPEEGs yielded new diagnostic information. Partial, age-dependent SD was highly effective in inducing sleep, which is important because in many cases EAs were found only during EEG recording in sleep. The procedure was safe and convenient.

Purpose: We wished to compare a parent-completed scale quantifying seizure severity (SS) in children with various seizure types with the clinicians' impression of SS and other clinical data., Methods: The parents of 117 children with recurrent seizures completed a 13-item, subjective scale (The Hague Seizure Severity Scale, HASS). Eight treating neurologists quantified SS on a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and supplied other clinical data., Results: Both the HASS and the VAS assessments of SS showed considerable variation within one seizure type. Significant differences were noted between groups with (a) absences and simple partial seizures (SPS), (b) complex partial seizures (CPS), and (c) generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). The correlation coefficient between the neurologists' and the parents' scores was 0.45 but did not exceed 0.26 after stratification for seizure type. The parents' score was not substantially influenced by various other clinical variables. The neurologists' score was correlated with resistance to treatment and presence of mental retardation., Conclusions: The SS ratings of the parents and the neurologists were not substantially correlated. The consideration that parents, as eyewitnesses to the seizures, are probably better judges of SS than clinicians may favor the use of a parent-completed scale to quantify SS. The HASS is a valid and reliable measure of parent-perceived SS that can be useful as an outcome measure in childhood epilepsy.

In 67 of 149 patients with a generalized first seizure, the occurrence of some kind of sensation immediately preceding the loss of consciousness was the only clue that possibly indicated focal onset of the seizure. We studied the interobserver agreement between six neurologists regarding the interpretation of these preceding feelings as either a nonspecific symptom or an aura implicating a focal onset of the seizure. The observers also classified the seizures as generalized from onset, undetermined, or partial secondarily generalized. To assess the accuracy of the classification, we obtained a standard EEG, an EEG after partial sleep deprivation, a computed tomography (CT) scan, and a follow-up report after 1 year. The subclassification on clinical grounds of a generalized first seizure is too unreliable and probably too invalid as well to be useful in clinical practice or in epidemiologic research.