Search

Funding Acknowledgements None. OnBehalf POLKARD Polish ICD Registry Objective The findings of Danish Study to assess the efficiency of ICD in patients with non ischemic heart failure has recently raised questions about the current strategy of ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. POLKARD - Polish ICD Registry is a prospective, non-randomised, central registry of patients who are referred for an implantation of an ICD in Poland. The Registry contains prospectively collected follow-up data including mortality. Purpose To compare survival rates between Polish and Danish ‘real-world’ non-ischemic primary prevention cohorts. Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up of patients referred for primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in Poland between April 2008 and November 2014 was performed. The primary outcome of the trial was all-cause mortality. Results: The polish study cohort was large (964) as compared to Danish population randomized to receive ICD therapy (556). The median follow-up time in DANISH Study and Polish ICD Registry was 67,6 and 77 months, respectively. Compared with patients enrolled in the DANISH Study, patients in the Polish ICD Registry were age-similar. However, the polish study population was male-dominated. What is more, male gender was identified as a risk factor for long-term mortality in polish study population (p = 0.005). In the matched cohorts, there was difference in survival between DANISH Study and Polish ICD Registry patients (all-cause mortality rates: 21,6% - 44 events per 1000 person-years and 39,3% - 72 events per 1000 person-years, respectively). Conclusions Our findings imply that survival among patients who receive a primary prevention ICD for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in clinical practice in Central Europe is different from Northern Europe.

Funding Acknowledgements none OnBehalf none Background The benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF) has been well proven but the benefit of ICD in subjects with non-ischaemic systolic HF is less well-established. Consequently, there is very limited evidence which patients with non-ischaemic HF would benefit most from receiving an ICD. Aim To determine the incidence and predictors of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ICD and non-ischaemic systolic HF. Methods Study population consisted of 420 consecutive patients with ICD and non-ischaemic systolic HF monitored remotely (on a daily basis) between 2010 and 2017 in tertiary care university hospital, in a densely inhabited, urban region of Poland. Sixty-six percentage of patients had cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Results During the median follow-up of 1645 days (range: 507-3515) sustained ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 100 patients (23.8%). Of those, ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VT/VF (combined) occurred in 10 (10.0%), 77 (77.0%) and 13 (13.0%) patients, respectively. Patients with versus without ventricular arrhythmia did differ with respect to baseline variables such as: left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) - median of 67 mm [49-82] vs 62 mm [46-78]; post-inflammatory HF (17 vs 9.7%, P = 0.045); atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter - AF/AFL (57 vs. 38.1%, P = 0.0009); supraventricular arrhythmia (SVT) - any supraventricular arrythmia >100/min other than AF/AFL (27 vs. 15.9%, P = 0.01); and left ventricular ejection fraction - EF (25 vs. 28%, P = 0.01). No differences were observed for age, sex, NYHA class, mitral regurgitation, common comorbidities (including diabetes and chronic renal disease) or concomitant medications. On multivariable regression analysis, LVEDD (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.004-1.09, P = 0.03), AF/AFL (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.21-2.72, P = 0.004) and SVT (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.21-3.01, P = 0.006) were identified as independent predictors of sustained ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ICD and non-ischaemic HF. All-cause mortality in patients with VT/VF was significantly higher than in subjects without sustained ventricular arrhythmias (33% vs. 20%, P = 0.03). Conclusions Ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 23.8% of patients with systolic non-ischaemic HF during 4.5 years of observation and was associated with significantly worse prognosis compared with subjects free of VT/VF. Left ventricular dimension, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia were identified as independent predictors for ventricular arrhythmia.

OnBehalf POLKARD Polish ICD Registry Background The protective effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death of patients presenting with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction are unequivocal. Nevertheless, female underrepresentation has been a consistent finding in all randomized controlled primary prevention ICD trials. Surprisingly, there is a vast body of literature on female primary prevention ICD patients exhibit a lower overall mortality. Purpose Therefore, we analyzed data from a large, nationwide POLKARD registry to evaluate the effect of sex on survival after primary prevention cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods All patients enrolled in the Polish ICD Registry from 2008 to 2014 were identified. Patients were included in the study if they were designated as receiving an ICD for primary prevention of SCD after documented non-ischeamic cardiomyopathy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess all-cause mortality. Results Of the 964 ICD recipients, 241 (25%) were women (mean age of 64± 0,45 years). During a mean follow-up of 5,53 ± 2,48 years 32% of women and 42% of men died. Kaplan-Meier curve depicted a significantly lower mortality for women than for men (p = 0,05). The median survival time was 6,73 years (55 deaths per 1000 person-years) versus 6,37 years (78 deaths per 1000 person-years) for women and men, respectively. Conclusions In agreement with previous studies, our data indicate that primary prevention implantation rates for dilated cardiomyopathy are lower in women. However, the reasons are not entirely understood.

@gradient: from 107 to 53 mmHg; after provocation: from 210 to 144 mmHg), a subaortic septal hypokinesia and an enlargement of the left ventricular outflow tract from 0.4 to 1.7 cm 2 and a 34% improvement of the exercise capacity using the 6-minute walk test. These changes are similar to the favorable results after TASH and surgical treatment. Conclusion: the application of radiofrequency energy at the endocardial site of the septum appears to be a new promising concept in the catheterbased treatment of pts with HOCM. It resulted in a significant effect as far as the changes both during the therapeutic session and during the