Search

Aims Patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, limited comprehensive data are available regarding their long-term outcomes. Methods and results Our retrospective registry included 2524 patients [1977 (78%) de novo, 547 (22%) upgrade patients] with mild to severe symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS ≥ 130ms. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation; secondary endpoints were death from any cause and post-procedural complications. In our cohort, upgrade patients were older [71 (65–77) vs. 67 (59–73) years; P Conclusion In our retrospective analysis, upgrade patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than de novo patients, which might be attributable to their more significant comorbidity burden. The occurrence of lead dysfunction and pocket infections was more frequent in the upgrade group.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): (NKFIA; NVKP_16-1-2016-0017 National Heart Program). Background Heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common causes of death on their own, but the coexistance of these two diseases are especially fatal. 1 In DM, sudden cardiac death (SCD) is more common than in non-DM patients, however in many cases, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could not prevent SCD. 2 Purpose Our aim is to decide which device warrant higher life expectancy, cardiac resynchronizational therapy with or without defibrillator. Methods We examined retrospectively 2525 CRT implanted patients, with a mean follow-up time of 4.6 years. Implantaions were based on the current guidelines. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while our composite end-point were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Results In our population, 928 people (36%) had diabetes. We did not find statistical differences between age (68 vs. 68 years; p Conclusions Adding an ICD for CRT patients with diabetes reduces the risk of all-cause mortality significantly by 32% (HR 0,68; CI 0,56-0,82; p‹0.001) during the first six years but diminished on longer follow-up time (HR 0,95; CI 0,80-1,12; p=0,54).

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the ÚNKP-21-3-II-SE-47, ÚNKP-20-3-I-SE-43 New National Excellence Program if the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary. Project no. NVKP_16-1–2016-0017 (’National Heart Program’) has been implemented with the support provided by the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, funded under the NVKP_16 funding scheme. The research was financed by the Thematic Excellence Programme (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the framework of the Therapeutic Development and Bioimaging thematic programmes of the Semmelweis University. This work was also supported by the Semmelweis 250+ Excellence PhD Scholarship (EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009). Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) can reverse the harmful effects of right ventricular pacing (RVP). Data are scarce on comparing long-term survival among patients who undergone CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) or CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) upgrade from pacemakers (PM) without prior ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Purpose We compared the differences in long-term all-cause mortality among PM patients receiving CRT-D or CRT-P upgrade. Methods Patients with conventional PMs developing heart failure despite optimal medical treatment and a high rate of RVP with no prior VAs were included. Altogether 326 patients were investigated, 117 (36%) upgraded to CRT-D, 209 (64%) to CRT-P in our retrospective registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed by comorbidities and CRT device types. Using topological data analysis, we identified risk groups based on the primary endpoint. Results During the median follow-up time of 3.6 years, 33 (28%) CRT-D and 145 (69%) of CRT-P upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. The CRT-D upgrade group showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the total cohort (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.81; p=0.002) and by ischaemic aetiology (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.29-0.76; p=0.002) compared to CRT-P. After adjustment, CRT-D, male gender and loop diuretics proved as independent predictors of all-cause mortality. Patients upgraded with CRT-D demonstrated favourable survival in the high-risk group over CRT-P. Conclusions Patients had survival benefit after CRT-D upgrade, compared to CRT-P, in the high-risk group and with ischaemic heart failre aetiology. However, no difference could be observed between the two groups among low- and intermediate-risk patients.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the ÚNKP-20-3-I New National Excellence Program if the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, the National Research, Development, and Innovation Office of Hungary (NKFIA; NVKP_16-1-2016-0017 National Heart Program), and the Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the framework of the Therapeutic Development thematic program of the Semmelweis University. This work was also supported by the Artificial Intelligence Research Filed Excellence Program of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology in Hungary (TKP/ITM/NKFIH). The research was also financed by the Thematic Excellence Program (Tématerületi Kiválósági Program, 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the framework of the Bioimaging thematic program of the Semmelweis University. Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) upgrade can reverse pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCMP) and related major ventricular arrhythmias (MVA). However, there is a lack of data comparing mortality benefit of adding an ICD to CRT during upgrade procedures in those without prior malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Purpose We aimed to compare the all-cause mortality, echocardiographic response, MVA occurrence and the rate of complications of patients with prior pacemakers (PM) upgraded to CRT-P or CRT-D devices. Methods Between 2000-2018 patients who underwent a successful CRT upgrade procedure from conventional pacemaker without a prior MVAs were collected. From 270 patients 83 (30.7%) upgraded to CRT-D, 187 (69.3%) to CRT-P device. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, secondary endpoints were echocardiographic response defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increase ≥5%, the occurrence of subsequent MVAs and the rate of periprocedural complications. Results CRT-D upgrade patients were more likely to be males, have a favourable renal function and lower LVEF compared to CRT-P group. During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 25 (30%) CRT-D and 131 (70%) CRT-P upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. By univariate analysis, CRT-D upgrade patients showed 45% (HR 0.55; 95%CI 0.38-0.78; p Conclusions Adding an ICD during CRT upgrade procedures showed 45% lower all-cause mortality risk than CRT-P alone in patients with a pacemaker and no previous ventricular arrhythmias. This beneficial effect was independent of the echocardiographic response, safety or subsequent ventricular arrhythmias. Abstract Figure.

Background There is limited data on the association of left ventricular (LV) lead position and long-term clinical outcome in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Purpose We evaluated the mid-term echocardiographic response and long-term all-cause mortality of patients who underwent CRT implantation by LV lead non-apical positions and further characterized them by right to left ventricular, interlead electrical delay (IED). Methods In our retrospective registry patients after CRT implantation between 2000 and 2018 were registered. Those with non-apical LV lead location were classified into anterior (n = 111), posterior (n = 652), and lateral (n = 1373) positions. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality assessed by univariate- and Cox multivariate analyses. Secondary endpoint was echocardiographic response within 6 months after CRT implantation. Results From 2136 patients 1180 (55.2%) reached the primary endpoint during the mean follow up time of 4.5 years. Univariate analysis showed patients with lateral position had significantly better outcome compared to others (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.90; p Conclusions After CRT implantation the most beneficial outcome was associated with lateral left ventricular lead location, moreover the greatest echocardiographic response was found when interlead electrical delay was longer than 110 ms in this group. Abstract Figure. All-cause mortality of total cohort

Background There are limited and incomprehensive long-term data on the effects of adding an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with non-ischemic heart failure. Purpose We compared the long-term all-cause mortality and relative risk reduction in mortality of non-ischemic patients after CRT-P vs. CRT-D implantation stratified by their Goldenberg risk score. Methods In our retrospective registry, data of 1196 non-ischemic patients who underwent CRT implantation between 2000 to 2018 were collected. Goldenberg sudden cardiac risk score was calculated by the presence of atrial fibrillation, NYHA class > 2, age > 70 years, blood urea nitrogen > 26mg/dl and QRS width. Results In our registry from 1196 CRT implanted patients with non-ischemic heart failure, 716 patients had all the required data to calculate the Goldenberg score. From this cohort 379 (53%) had CRT-P and 337 (47%) CRT-D implantation. The mean value of the Goldenberg score was 2.7 in the total cohort, while a significantly higher score was found in the CRT-P group (CRT-P 2.9 ± 1.1 vs. CRT-D 2.5 ± 1.1 p 3) Goldenberg score, we found that CRT-D patients with lower risk score showed mortality benefit compared to CRT-P (HR 0.69; 95%, CI 0.53-0.89; p = 0.001). In the contrary there was no apparent mortality benefit in CRT-D patients compared to CRT-P when high Goldenberg score subgroup was analyzed (HR 0.99; 95%, CI 0.67-1.45; p = 0.95). Conclusions In non-ischemic heart failure patients, Goldenberg sudden cardiac risk score can be also applied. In CRT-D patients those with less co-morbidities and lower (≤3) Goldenberg risk score showed mortality benefit compared to CRT-P patients, while among patients with higher score (>3) adding an ICD had no additional effect on all-cause mortality.

Background Heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher risk for all-cause mortality and also for sudden cardiac death. We lack data on the effect of adding an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on all-cause mortality in diabetic heart failure patients. Purpose We aimed to investigate the risk of DM on all-cause mortality in CRT patients, and to examine the beneficial effect of adding an ICD on all-cause mortality by left ventricular ejection fraction in CRT patients with or without DM. Methods We examined retrospectively 2525 patients who underwent CRT implantation based on the current guidelines at our clinic between June 2000 and September 2018, of which 928 (36%) had diabetes. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, also expressed as events per 100 person-year by quintiles of ejection fraction (EF) with or without an ICD or DM. Time to event data was investigated by Kaplan Meier and multivariate Cox regressional analysis. Results During our mean follow-up time of 4.6 years, 1432 (56%) patients reached the primary endpoint, of which 553 (38%) had DM. In the DM group, hypertension (82% vs. 66%; p‹0.01), ischemic etiology (56% vs. 44%; p‹0.01), myocardial infarction (43% vs. 36%; p‹0.01) was more frequent compared to non-DM group. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the implantation of an ICD (54% vs. 53%; p = 0,84). Those with DM showed a 25% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.40; p‹0.01), also observable after adjusting for relevant clinical covariates such as age, gender, atrial fibrillation and the addition of an ICD (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.31; p‹0.01). Examined as all-cause mortality per 100 person-year follow up, patients with EF›30% and DM (13,7 events/ 100 person-year follow-up for an EF 30-35%) showed similar risk as those without DM and a severely impaired left ventricular function with EF‹25% (14 events/100 person-year follow-up for an EF Conclusions Diabetes was found as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in CRT patients. Those with a left ventricular ejection fraction above 30% have comparable risk of mortality as non-diabetic patients with a severely impaired left ventricular function. In diabetic CRT patients the addition of an ICD reduces the risk of all-cause mortality mostly seen in the first six years. These findings might implicate the relevance of adding an ICD to CRT even at a higher ejection fraction in those with severe comorbidities such as diabetes. Abstract Figure. All-cause mortality in CRT, DM patients