Search

The combination of sewage anaerobic treatment and partial nitritation/anammox process (PN/A) can make wastewater treatment plants energetically self-sufficient. However, PN/A application has been a challenge in low-nitrogen wastewaters and it is little explored in anaerobically pretreated domestic sewage, as well as aeration strategies and the PN/A feasibility at ambient temperature. This study investigated PN/A in a sequential batch reactor (SBR) treating real anaerobically pretreated domestic sewage. After the startup, SBR was fed with real wastewater and operated at 35°C and at ambient temperature (20–31°C) without total nitrogen (TN) removal decrease (71 ± 8 and 75 ± 6%, respectively). The median ammonium and TN removals were 68 ± 21 and 59 ± 9%, respectively with 7 min on/14 min off strategy, which represents 12.3 ± 4.2 mg L−1 N-NH4+ effluent, which is lower than Brazilian discharge limits. The qPCR results showed anammox abundance in the range of 108–109 n° copies gVSS−1. Thus, results were very promising and showed the feasibility of the PN/A process for treating real anaerobically pretreated domestic sewage at ambient temperature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alkaline treatment is widely used to reduce pathogens in sewage sludge in developing countries and guarantee that it is safe for use in agriculture. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alkaline treatment applied to waste-activated (WAS) and Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)-sludge on the bacterial community, pathogens (viable helminths eggs and Salmonella spp), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). The bacterial community structure was examined through denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE), targeting 16S rRNA genes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was applied to evaluate the presence of several ARGs. The conducted alkaline experiment consisted of adding hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2) to sewage sludges. Samples were taken before and after 2, 24, 48, and 72 hours of treatment. Alkaline treatment changed considerably the bacterial community structure and after 24 hours, shifts in bacterial profiles were more pronounced in the UASB sludge sample than in WAS. Some bacteria remained under extreme pH conditions (pH > 12), such as Azospira oryzae and Dechloromonas denitrificans in the WAS samples, and Geothrix and Geobacter in the UASB sludge samples. The values of pathogens and indicators in the sludge after 24 hours of alkaline treatment meet sanitary law regulations and thus the sludges could have the potential to agricultural distribution. It is important to highlight that ARG, which are not currently present in sanitary regulations, were detected in the sludge samples after the alkaline treatment, which could be a concern for human health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]