1. Risk of heat illness in men and women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Robert M. Gifford, Rebecca M. Reynolds, David R. Woods, Tommaso Todisco, Michael Allerhand, Mike Stacey, and Takeshi Fujisawa
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Risk ,Ovid medline ,Hot Temperature ,Adolescent ,010501 environmental sciences ,Heat Stress Disorders ,01 natural sciences ,Biochemistry ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Heat illness ,Medicine ,Humans ,Women ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Data reporting ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Men ,Environmental Exposure ,medicine.disease ,Increased risk ,Relative risk ,Meta-analysis ,Quality Score ,Female ,business ,Demography - Abstract
Background Heat illness (HI) is a growing global concern; its incidence has risen dramatically across the world in recent years. The individual factors whereby elevated core temperature produces HI are not well-understood. Given known physiological differences between men and women pertaining to temperature regulation, we hypothesized that women would be at increased risk of HI than men. Objectives We aimed to determine the relative risk of HI in women compared with men through an exhaustive literature review and meta-analysis. Methods We search PubMed and Ovid Medline databases from inception to Apr 2017. Search terms included all permutations of sex and heat illness (including heatstroke and exertional heat illness) with no language restrictions. We included adult or adolescent human data reporting comparable male and female HI rates. One reviewer identified and screened titles and abstracts. Two independent reviewers applied eligibility criteria. Disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer. Results Of 5888 articles identified by searches, 36 were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. The mean (standard deviation) quality score was 3.31(1.25)/5. Overall the rate among women was consistently lower than men across the lifespan. The male: female pooled IRR was 2.28 (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF