Search

Abstract: In recent years, fuzzy models have been acknowledged as a suitable approach for species distribution modelling due to their transparency and their ability to incorporate the ecological gradient theory. Specifically, the overlapping class boundaries of a fuzzy model are similar to the transitions between different environmental conditions. However, the need for ecological expert knowledge is an important constraint when applying fuzzy species distribution models. Moreover, the consistency of the ecological preferences of some fish species across different rivers has been widely contested. Recent research has shown that data-driven fuzzy models may solve this ‘knowledge acquisition bottleneck’ and this paper is a further contribution. The aim was to analyse the brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.) habitat preferences based on a data-driven fuzzy modelling technique and to compare the resulting fuzzy models with a commonly applied modelling technique, Random Forests. A heuristic nearest ascent hill-climbing algorithm for fuzzy rule optimisation and Random Forests were applied to analyse the ecological preferences of brown trout in 93 mesohabitats. No significant differences in model performance were observed between the optimal fuzzy model and the Random Forests model and both approaches selected river width, the cover index and flow velocity as the most important variables describing brown trout habitat suitability. Further, the fuzzy model combined ecological relevance with reasonable interpretability, whereas the transparency of the Random Forests model was limited. This paper shows that fuzzy models may be a valid approach for species distribution modelling and that their performance is comparable to that of state-of-the-art modelling techniques like Random Forests. Fuzzy models could therefore be a valuable decision support tool for river managers and enhance communication between stakeholders. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Fire danger indices are used by fire management agencies to assess fire weather conditions and issue public warnings. The most widely used fire danger indices in Australia are the McArthur Fire Forest Danger Index and the Grassland Fire Danger Index. These indices are calculated at weather stations using measurements of weather variables and fuel information. For a vast country like Australia when assessing the risk of severe fire weather events, it is also important to calculate the spatial distribution of these indices considering the extreme tail of the distribution. The spatial distribution of one of the fire weather danger indices regularly used in Australia is presented in this paper. In particular, we present the spatial distribution of the long-term tendency of extreme values of the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI). This indicator of fire weather conditions was assessed by calculating the return period of its extreme values by fitting extreme value distributions to data sets of FFDI at 78 recording stations around Australia. The spatial distribution of these return periods was obtained by using spatial interpolation algorithms with the recording stations measurements. Two conventional and two new algorithms based on machine-learning techniques were tested. This study shows that the best interpolation results for the FFDI can be obtained by using a combination of random forest and inverse distance weighting interpolation algorithms. The spatial distribution of the seasonal FFDI return period shows that the highest FFDI over large parts of southern Australia occurs during the summer months whilst in northern Australia it occurs in spring. The results also show that the FFDI in eastern Australia, the most populated region of the country, is higher inland than in the coastal areas particularly during spring and summer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]