Search

[Display omitted] • State of the art on real-time sensors for indoor air evaluation is reviewed. • High spatiotemporal resolution data from real-time sensors is favorable for the risk assessment of indoor air pollution. • Challenges including performance, stability and calibration of sensors still remained. • Sensors with high performance, low price, and more target pollutants are expected. People generally spend most of their time indoors, making indoor air quality be of great significance to human health. Large spatiotemporal heterogeneity of indoor air pollution can be hardly captured by conventional filter-based monitoring but real-time monitoring. Real-time monitoring is conducive to change air assessment mode from static and sparse analysis to dynamic and massive analysis, and has made remarkable strides in indoor air evaluation. In this review, the state of art, strengths, challenges, and further development of real-time sensors used in indoor air evaluation are focused on. Researches using real-time sensors for indoor air evaluation have increased rapidly since 2018, and are mainly conducted in China and the USA, with the most frequently investigated air pollutants of PM 2.5. In addition to high spatiotemporal resolution, real-time sensors for indoor air evaluation have prominent advantages in 3-dimensional monitoring, pollution peak and source identification, and short-term health effect evaluation. Huge amounts of data from real-time sensors also facilitate the modeling and prediction of indoor air pollution. However, challenges still remain in extensive deployment of real-time sensors indoors, including the selection, performance, stability, as well as calibration of sensors. In future, sensors with high performance, long-term stability, low price, and low energy consumption are welcomed. Furthermore, more target air pollutants are also expected to be detected simultaneously by real-time sensors in indoor air monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Exposure inequality was contrary between ambient and household PM 2.5 exposure. • The poorest experienced the highest PM 2.5 exposure though ambient exposure was low. • Negative concentration index gradually increased indicating a transition towards equality. • Aggressive countermeasures reduced ambient exposures but benefited people disproportionately. • Spontaneous clean household energy transition effectively reduced the exposure inequality. The society has high concerns on the inequality that people are disproportionately exposed to ambient air pollution, but with more time spent indoors, the disparity in the total exposure considering both indoor and outdoor exposure has not been explored; and with the socioeconomical development and efforts in fighting against air pollution, it is unknown how the exposure inequality changed over time. Based on the city-level panel data, this study revealed the Concentration Index ( C ) in ambient PM 2.5 exposure inequality was positive, indicating the low-income group exposed to lower ambient PM 2.5 ; however, the total PM 2.5 exposure was negatively correlated with the income, showing a negative C value. The low-income population exposed to high PM 2.5 associated with larger contributions of indoor exposure from the residential emissions. The total PM 2.5 exposure caused 1.13 (0.63–1.73) million premature deaths in 2019, with only 14 % were high-income population. The toughest-ever air pollution countermeasures have reduced ambient PM 2.5 exposures effectively that, however, benefited the rich population more than the others. The transition to clean household energy sources significantly affected on indoor air quality improvements, as well as alleviation of ambient air pollution, resulting in notable reductions of the total PM 2.5 exposure and especially benefiting the low-income groups. The negative C values decreased from 2000 to 2019, indicating a significantly reducing trend in the total PM 2.5 exposure inequality over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Our study indicates abrupt reductions in ambient PM 2.5 from lockdown in China. • The lockdown also led to significant increases in indoor PM 2.5 exposure. • Hundreds of premature deaths were added due to increased household PM 2.5. • Exposure to indoor air pollution is comparable to ambient air pollution exposure. • The lockdown caused an overall increase in integrated population weighted exposure. Ambient and household air pollution are found to lead to premature deaths from all-cause or cause-specific death. The national lockdown measures in China during COVID-19 were found to lead to abrupt changes in ambient surface air quality, but indoor air quality changes were neglected. In this study, we aim to investigate the impacts of lockdown measures on both ambient and household air pollution as well as the short-term health effects of air pollution changes. In this study, an up-to-date emission inventory from January to March 2020 in China was developed based on air quality observations in combination with emission-concentration response functions derived from chemical transport modeling. These emission inventories, together with the emissions data from 2017 to 2019, were fed into the state-of-the-art regional chemistry transport model to simulate the air quality in the North China Plain. A hypothetical scenario assuming no lockdown effects in 2020 was also performed to determine the effects of the lockdown on air quality in 2020. A difference-to-difference approach was adopted to isolate the effects on air quality due to meteorological conditions and long-term decreasing emission trends by comparing the PM 2.5 changes during lockdown to those before lockdown in 2020 and in previous years (2017–2019). The short-term premature mortality changes from both ambient and household PM 2.5 changes were quantified based on two recent epidemiological studies, with uncertainty of urban and rural population migration considerations. The national lockdown measures during COVID-19 led to a reduction of 5.1 µg m−3 in ambient PM 2.5 across the North China Plain (NCP) from January 25th to March 5th compared with the hypothetical simulation with no lockdown measures. However, a difference-to-difference method showed that the daily domain average PM 2.5 in the NCP decreased by 9.7 µg m−3 between lockdown periods before lockdown in 2020, while it decreased by 7.9 µg m−3 during the same periods for the previous three-year average from 2017 to 2019, demonstrating that lockdown measures may only have caused a 1.8 µg m−3 decrease in the NCP. We then found that the integrated population-weighted PM 2.5 , including both ambient and indoor PM 2.5 exposure, increased by 5.1 µg m−3 during the lockdown periods compared to the hypothetical scenario, leading to additional premature deaths of 609 (95% CI: 415–775) to 2,860 (95% CI: 1,436–4,273) in the short term, depending on the relative risk chosen from the epidemiological studies. Our study indicates that lockdown measures in China led to abrupt reductions in ambient PM 2.5 concentration but also led to significant increases in indoor PM 2.5 exposure due to confined indoor activities and increased usages of household fuel for cooking and heating. We estimated that hundreds of premature deaths were added as a combination of decreased ambient PM 2.5 and increased household PM 2.5. Our findings suggest that the reduction in ambient PM 2.5 was negated by increased exposure to household air pollution, resulting in an overall increase in integrated population weighted exposure. Although lockdown measures were instrumental in reducing the exposure to pollution concentration in cities, rural areas bore the brunt, mainly due to the use of dirty solid fuels, increased population density due to the large-scale migration of people from urban to rural areas during the Chinese New Year and long exposure time to HAP due to restrictions in outdoor movement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]