Search

In this paper, we consider classes of decision tables with many-valued decisions closed under operations of the removal of columns, the changing of decisions, the permutation of columns, and the duplication of columns. We study relationships among three parameters of these tables: the complexity of a decision table (if we consider the depth of the decision trees, then the complexity of a decision table is the number of columns in it), the minimum complexity of a deterministic decision tree, and the minimum complexity of a nondeterministic decision tree. We consider the rough classification of functions characterizing relationships and enumerate all possible seven types of relationships.

In this paper, we consider classes of conventional decision tables closed relative to the removal of attributes (columns) and changing decisions assigned to rows. For tables from an arbitrary closed class, we study the dependence of the minimum complexity of deterministic and nondeterministic decision trees on the complexity of the set of attributes attached to columns. We also study the dependence of the minimum complexity of deterministic decision trees on the minimum complexity of nondeterministic decision trees. Note that a nondeterministic decision tree can be interpreted as a set of true decision rules that covers all rows of the table.

In this research, we consider decision trees that incorporate standard queries with one feature per query as well as hypotheses consisting of all features’ values. These decision trees are used to represent knowledge and are comparable to those investigated in exact learning, in which membership queries and equivalence queries are used. As an application, we look into the issue of creating decision trees for two cases: the sorting of a sequence that contains equal elements and multiple-value decision tables which are modified from UCI Machine Learning Repository. We contrast the efficiency of several forms of optimal (considering the parameter depth) decision trees with hypotheses for the aforementioned applications. We also investigate the efficiency of decision trees built by dynamic programming and by an entropy-based greedy method. We discovered that the greedy algorithm produces very similar results compared to the results of dynamic programming algorithms. Therefore, since the dynamic programming algorithms take a long time, we may readily apply the greedy algorithms.

In this paper, we consider classes of decision tables with many-valued decisions closed under operations of the removal of columns, the changing of decisions, the permutation of columns, and the duplication of columns. We study relationships among three parameters of these tables: the complexity of a decision table (if we consider the depth of the decision trees, then the complexity of a decision table is the number of columns in it), the minimum complexity of a deterministic decision tree, and the minimum complexity of a nondeterministic decision tree. We consider the rough classification of functions characterizing relationships and enumerate all possible seven types of relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we deal with distributed data represented either as a finite set T of decision tables with equal sets of attributes or a finite set I of information systems with equal sets of attributes. In the former case, we discuss a way to the study decision trees common to all tables from the set T: building a decision table in which the set of decision trees coincides with the set of decision trees common to all tables from T. We show when we can build such a decision table and how to build it in a polynomial time. If we have such a table, we can apply various decision tree learning algorithms to it. We extend the considered approach to the study of test (reducts) and decision rules common to all tables from T. In the latter case, we discuss a way to study the association rules common to all information systems from the set I: building a joint information system for which the set of true association rules that are realizable for a given row ρ and have a given attribute a on the right-hand side coincides with the set of association rules that are true for all information systems from I, have the attribute a on the right-hand side, and are realizable for the row ρ. We then show how to build a joint information system in a polynomial time. When we build such an information system, we can apply various association rule learning algorithms to it.

Conventional decision trees use queries each of which is based on one attribute. In this study, we also examine decision trees that handle additional queries based on hypotheses. This kind of query is similar to the equivalence queries considered in exact learning. Earlier, we designed dynamic programming algorithms for the computation of the minimum depth and the minimum number of internal nodes in decision trees that have hypotheses. Modification of these algorithms considered in the present paper permits us to build decision trees with hypotheses that are optimal relative to the depth or relative to the number of the internal nodes. We compare the length and coverage of decision rules extracted from optimal decision trees with hypotheses and decision rules extracted from optimal conventional decision trees to choose the ones that are preferable as a tool for the representation of information. To this end, we conduct computer experiments on various decision tables from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. In addition, we also consider decision tables for randomly generated Boolean functions. The collected results show that the decision rules derived from decision trees with hypotheses in many cases are better than the rules extracted from conventional decision trees.

In this paper, we consider decision trees that use both conventional queries based on one attribute each and queries based on hypotheses of values of all attributes. Such decision trees are similar to those studied in exact learning, where membership and equivalence queries are allowed. We present greedy algorithm based on entropy for the construction of the above decision trees and discuss the results of computer experiments on various data sets and randomly generated Boolean functions.