Search

When computers started to become a dominant part of technology around the 1950s, fundamental questions about reliable designs and robustness were of great relevance. Their development gave rise to the exploration of new questions, such as what made brains reliable (since neurons can die) and how computers could get inspiration from neural systems. In parallel, the first artificial neural networks came to life. Since then, the comparative view between brains and computers has been developed in new, sometimes unexpected directions. With the rise of deep learning and the development of connectomics, an evolutionary look at how both hardware and neural complexity have evolved or designed is required. In this paper, we argue that important similarities have resulted both from convergent evolution (the inevitable outcome of architectural constraints) and inspiration of hardware and software principles guided by toy pictures of neurobiology. Moreover, dissimilarities and gaps originate from the lack of major innovations that have paved the way to biological computing (including brains) that are completely absent within the artificial domain. As it occurs within synthetic biocomputation, we can also ask whether alternative minds can emerge from A.I. designs. Here, we take an evolutionary view of the problem and discuss the remarkable convergences between living and artificial designs and what are the pre-conditions to achieve artificial intelligence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deep Learning (DL) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have shown great success in different areas of medical diagnostics. In this paper, we show another success in orthodontics. In orthodontics, the right treatment timing of many actions and operations is crucial because many environmental and genetic conditions may modify jaw growth. The stage of growth is related to the Cervical Vertebra Maturation (CVM) degree. Thus, determining the CVM to determine the suitable timing of the treatment is important. In orthodontics, lateral X-ray radiography is used to determine it. Many classical methods need knowledge and time to look and identify some features. Nowadays, ML and AI tools are used for many medical and biological diagnostic imaging. This paper reports on the development of a Deep Learning (DL) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method to determine (directly from images) the degree of maturation of CVM classified in six degrees. The results show the performances of the proposed method in different contexts with different number of images for training, evaluation and testing and different pre-processing of these images. The proposed model and method are validated by cross validation. The implemented software is almost ready for use by orthodontists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Automatic question answering (QA), which can greatly facilitate the access to information, is an important task in artificial intelligence. Recent years have witnessed the development of QA methods based on deep learning. However, a great amount of data is needed to train deep neural networks, and it is laborious to annotate training data for factoid QA of new domains or languages. In this paper, a distantly supervised method is proposed to automatically generate QA pairs. Additional efforts are paid to let the generated questions reflect the query interests and expression styles of users by exploring the community QA. Specifically, the generated questions are selected according to the estimated probabilities they are asked. Diverse paraphrases of questions are mined from community QA data, considering that the model trained on monotonous synthetic questions is very sensitive to variants of question expressions. Experimental results show that the model solely trained on generated data via the distant supervision and mined paraphrases could answer real-world questions with the accuracy of 49.34%. When limited annotated training data is available, significant improvements could be achieved by incorporating the generated data. An improvement of 1.35 absolute points is still observed on WebQA, a dataset with large-scale annotated training samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deep convolutional neural networks (ConvNets), which are at the heart of many new emerging applications, achieve remarkable performance in audio and visual recognition tasks. Unfortunately, achieving accuracy often implies significant computational costs, limiting deployability. In modern ConvNets it is typical for the convolution layers to consume the vast majority of computational resources during inference. This has made the acceleration of these layers an important research area in academia and industry. In this paper, we examine the effects of co-optimizing the internal structures of the convolutional layers and underlying implementation of fundamental convolution operation. We demonstrate that a combination of these methods can have a big impact on the overall speedup of a ConvNet, achieving a ten-fold increase over baseline. We also introduce a new class of fast one-dimensional (1D) convolutions for ConvNets using the Toom–Cook algorithm. We show that our proposed scheme is mathematically well-grounded, robust, and does not require any time-consuming retraining, while still achieving speedups solely from convolutional layers with no loss in baseline accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep neural networks; interpretability; explainability; fairness; accountability; transparency; human-centric AI; human-like learning; intelligence augmentation EN artificial intelligence deep neural networks interpretability explainability fairness accountability transparency human-centric AI human-like learning intelligence augmentation 332 1 03/30/21 20210301 NES 210301 1. Artificial intelligence, deep neural networks, interpretability, fairness, accountability, transparency, human-centric AI, human-like learning, intelligence augmentation, explainability The presented study gives an uplifting example of the need for a mutualistic symbiosis of human intelligence (HI) and artificial intelligence (AI). We can explore this human-centered partnership of people and AI from two perspectives: (1) intelligence augmentation and the (2) Human Intelligence (HI) for Artificial Intelligence (AI) perspective (HI4AI). [Extracted from the article]