Search

Abstract: The last 10 years have seen more research on insect macroevolution than all the previous years combined. Here, I summarize and criticise the claims that have been made by comparative phylogenetic and fossil studies, and identify some future opportunities. We know the fossil record and phylogeny of insects much better than we did 10 years ago. We cannot simply ascribe the richness of insects, or their subtaxa, to either age or diversification rate. There is evidence that fossil family richness peaked much earlier than previously suspected. Phylogenetic evidence, however, suggests that species‐level net diversification rates are accelerating, though this is highly variable across taxa, implying ongoing changes in global taxonomic composition. Although there is evidence that wings and metamorphosis have had some macroevolutionary effects, the most definitive broad phylogenetic study does not suggest that they directly elevated net diversification of species. There is little evidence that insect body size influences net diversification rate. Compared to other phyla, arthropod richness, of which insects comprise the major part, is best explained by non‐marine habit, presence of parasitic lifestyles, a skeleton, vision, and dioecy. Herbivory cannot yet robustly be said to increase diversification over other diets across all insects: there are contrary analyses, and effects differ in different taxa. Many phylogenetic studies now document how it sometimes does: from co‐speciation, to diffuse co‐evolution with host shifting. The last decade has shown that climate change and biogeographic processes are likely important in generating or limiting insect diversification, but there is a need for greater statistical rigour in such studies. There is also a need to understand the validity of some widely used statistical methods better, and to make better use of the data and methods that exist. Macroevolutionary entomology could greatly benefit from online data integration platforms to facilitate analyses of broader scope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Behavioural interactions among relatives may have consequences for many other traits. We tested the hypothesis that solitary parasitoids (displaying siblicidal behaviour in their larvae) have narrower host ranges than gregarious parasitoids (with tolerant larvae). In laboratory experiments, we compared parasitization success in two sister species of braconid wasp [ Aphaereta genevensis (Fischer), solitary, and Aphaereta pallipes (Say), gregarious (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiini)] on eight Drosophila species or strains. Host species or strain was the most important factor affecting parasitization success, and some of this variation was accountable to host physiological defences. Although two hosts were more suitable for the solitary species, and one more suitable for the gregarious species, these differences were small, and there was no consistent difference across all hosts. Wasp body size was positively correlated with parasitization success in both wasp species. This may be because body size increases oviposition success, or the motivation to oviposit. In A. pallipes parasitization success peaked after 3–4 days, but later in A. genevensis. This is likely due to low life expectancy and high egg loads increasing oviposition tendency in young A. pallipes, and egg limitation decreasing oviposition tendency in old A. pallipes. These data suggest that interactions among wasp larvae do not greatly affect the size of the fundamental niche examined here. However, they show the potential for life history traits, which differ between the species as a likely consequence of larval interactions, to affect the extent of the realized niche. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]