1. Numerical investigation on a precast bridge using GPC and BFRP reinforcements subjected to cross-fault rupture and fling step excitation.
- Author
-
Ngo, Tuan T., Pham, Thong M., Hao, Hong, Tran, Duong T., and Bi, Kaiming
- Subjects
- *
GROUND motion , *MODULUS of rigidity , *PORTLAND cement , *REINFORCING bars , *EARTHQUAKES - Abstract
This study investigates the seismic performances of a precast bridge made of geopolymer concrete (GPC) with fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements subjected to cross-fault ground motions. A numerical model was developed and verified against experimental results from a previous study and then used to evaluate the bridge's performances under earthquake excitations. The study found that a simplified model was able to reliably capture the failure pattern and displacement response of the bridge, reducing simulation time significantly. Additionally, the numerical results indicated the combination of torsional and flexural cracks was the primarily damage mode of the columns, which was not observed in the experimental test. This study also revealed that while the performances of the bridge using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and GPC were similar under low ground excitations, GPC columns were more susceptible to brittle failure under higher ground excitations due to their brittleness. The use of FRP reinforcements led to similar displacement response as steel reinforcements under low ground displacement excitation, although severe flexural and shear damages on the column of Bent 2 were observed due to the lower elastic modulus and shear resistance of Basalt FRP material than steel. To address the disadvantages of brittle GPC and low-modulus of basalt FRP reinforcements, it is suggested to reinforce GPC with fibres and/or increase stirrup ratios if green GPC and corrosion-resistant basalt FRP reinforcements are used to construct bridges for seismic resistance. • Geopolymer bridge with FRP reinforcement under cross-fault ground motions. • Simplified FE model can reliably predict the structural responses. • Numerical results indicate failure mode, not found in test. • Compare bridge with GPC and FRP reinforcement with conventional bridge. • Specify key pros and cons of bridges with GPC and FRP reinforcement [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF