Search

High-density neural devices are now offering the possibility to record from neuronal populations in vivo at unprecedented scale. However, the mechanical drifts often observed in these recordings are currently a major issue for "spike sorting," an essential analysis step to identify the activity of single neurons from extracellular signals. Although several strategies have been proposed to compensate for such drifts, the lack of proper benchmarks makes it hard to assess the quality and effectiveness of motion correction. In this paper, we present a benchmark study to precisely and quantitatively evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art motion correction algorithms introduced in the literature. Using simulated recordings with induced drifts, we dissect the origins of the errors performed while applying a motion correction algorithm as a preprocessing step in the spike sorting pipeline. We show how important it is to properly estimate the positions of the neurons from extracellular traces in order to correctly estimate the probe motion, compare several interpolation procedures, and highlight what are the current limits for motion correction approaches., (Copyright © 2024 Garcia et al.)

Recently, a new generation of devices have been developed to record neural activity simultaneously from hundreds of electrodes with a very high spatial density, both for in vitro and in vivo applications. While these advances enable to record from many more cells, they also challenge the already complicated process of spike sorting (i.e., extracting isolated single-neuron activity from extracellular signals). In this work, we used synthetic ground-truth recordings with controlled levels of correlations among neurons to quantitatively benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art spike sorters focusing specifically on spike collisions. Our results show that while modern template-matching-based algorithms are more accurate than density-based approaches, all methods, to some extent, failed to detect synchronous spike events of neurons with similar extracellular signals. Interestingly, the performance of the sorters is not largely affected by the spiking activity in the recordings, with respect to average firing rates and spike-train correlation levels. Since the performances of all modern spike sorting algorithms can be affected as function of the activity of the recorded neurons, scientific claims on correlations and synchrony should be carefully assessed based on the analysis provided in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Garcia et al.)