Search

Engineering efforts to handle contemporary energy supply challenges and mitigate pollutant emission lead towards more complicated systems. Power plants are supplementing with additional processing units, alternative production modes and higher level of automation. Wind and solar sources, biomass combustion, gasification, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and cogeneration have appeared as important players in the energy systems. The increasing complexity comprises a risk that the systems become less manageable and less stable than currently. Traditional steady-state engineering methods cannot fully address these challenges that are inherently dynamic in their nature. Dynamic process simulation appears as important tool to the systems design and optimisation tasks. A large variety of dynamic process modelling and simulation approaches has been presented recent years. This paper presents a brief review of methods and simulation packages that are generally applied for studying energy systems' transient behaviour. A CCS capable power plant is presented as an example of utilizing dynamic process simulation for virtual evaluation of a novel electricity production concept. The modelling was performed using two simulators Apros and Aspen Plus Dynamics, which were linked together for dynamic simulating the full chain of cryogenic oxygen distillation, oxy combustion, turbine islands and carbon dioxide purification and liquefaction operations. • Dynamic simulations for design and optimisation of contemporary energy systems have been reviewed. • A case study for evaluating oxy combustion CFB boiler cycle with carbon capturing is presented. • Co-simulation with two dynamic process simulation software: Apros and Aspen Plus Dynamics were shown. • Flexibility aspects of oxy combustion power plant are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study explores future development of biomass uses across different climate policy scenarios and under different assumptions of biomass supply availability and technology performances. Broad bioenergy technology portfolios and generations provide flexibility to allocate bioenergy to supply a specific final energy mix and to remove carbon dioxide by combining bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS). The paper aim is to perform a detailed and focused analysis of the availability of biomass gasification and methanisation and the role of these green gas energy carriers in the decarbonisation strategies using a model based approach to see how some countries technology appropriation evolves through the XXIst century. The results show that the future of bioenergy depends mostly on countries bioenergy supply and demand that are partly triggered by climate policies. Besides, very diverse local biomass end use patterns are highlighted depending on local resource availability, economic growth and climate policies. The majority of modern uses will be possible with a biomass transformation through the gas vector thanks to methanisation and gasification processes. Technology maturities and efficiencies are also essential for bioenergy development for the field competitiveness. In presence of climate policies, the deployment of biomass methanisation and gasification increases two or three times faster due to higher competitiveness compared to highly taxed fossil fuel. The possibility to implement CCS fosters even more the use of bioenergy for decarbonisation strategies in the long term and switching the allocation of the resource in favor of gasification with CCS. • Bioenergy potential is used from 25% in 2015 to 75–85% in 2100. • With climate policies, methanisation and gasification develop 2–3 times faster. • Biomass valorization plays a major role in electricity and fuels conversion. • Electricity and heat valorizations are prominent in North, biofuels elsewhere. • Methanisation develops earlier than gasification but it catches up after 2050. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]