Search

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is an important diagnostic tool; however, it is often unsuccessful due to high viscosity of cystic fluid. In an effort to improve FNA, we objectively compared eight vacuum device configurations to determine the most effective method for aspirating viscous fluid collections. We also tested a high-frequency oscillation (HFO) technique that could be employed in FNA. Materials and methods Maximum gauge pressures of four vacuum devices were measured: two standard EUS-FNA syringes, a 50-cc Alliance II device, and a nonmedical hand vacuum pump. To aspirate a viscous stock solution, 19-gauge and 22-gauge needles were used and flow rates were calculated. HFO was also applied to the needle during aspiration to determine effect on aspiration rate. Results Aspiration devices generated maximum gauge pressures ranging from –21.5 to –27.5 inHg. The 19-gauge FNA needle aspirated viscous fluid 11.3 × faster on average than a 22-gauge needle. HFO increased average flow rates by 29.7 % in 19G and 124.6 % in 22G configurations. Conclusion EUS-FNA of viscous fluid can be optimized by using the lowest possible gauge needle and connecting a vacuum device capable of generating and sustaining near perfect vacuum. This can be accomplished by maximizing syringe volume. In addition, connector-tubing length between the syringe and needle should be minimized, and tubing wall should be sufficiently strong to resist collapse under vacuum. Other novel techniques to increase fluid yield include a hand vacuum pump and application of HFO to FNA.

Background and study aims: Direct percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy has been described as a minimally invasive intervention for the debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to confirm these findings in a US referral center and evaluate the clinical value of this modality in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis as well as other types of intra-abdominal fluid collections and necrosis. Patients and methods: Twelve consecutive patients with WOPN or other abdominal abscess requiring debridement and washout underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage catheter placement. Each patient then underwent direct percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy and washout with repeat debridement performed until complete. Drains were then removed once output fell below 30 mL/day and imaging confirmed resolution. The primary endpoints were time to clinical resolution and sustained resolution at 1-year follow up. Results: Ten patients were treated for WOPN, one for necrotic hepatic abscesses, and one for omental necrosis. The median time to intervention was 85 days with an average of 2.3 necrosectomies performed. Complete removal of drains was accomplished in 11 patients (92 %). The median time to resolution was 57 days. No serious adverse events occurred; however, one patient developed pancreaticocutaneous fistulas. Ten patients completed 1-year surveillance of which none required drain replacement. No patients required surgery or repeat endoscopy. Conclusions: This series supports the premise that direct percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe and effective intervention for intra-abdominal fluid collections and necrosis in appropriately selected patients. Our study demonstrates a high clinical success rate with minimal adverse events. This modality offers several potential advantages over surgical and transgastric approaches including use of improved accessibility, an excellent safety profile, and requirement for only deep or moderate sedation.