Search

Purpose: Increasing CT capacity to keep pace with rising ED demand is critical. The conventional process has inherent drawbacks. We evaluated an off-console automated AI enhanced workflow which moves all final series creation off-console. We hypothesized the off-console workflow would 1) decrease overall ED CT exam begin to end times and decrease length and variability of time CT is occupied at the individual exam level., Methods: Study population was identified retrospectively and included all CT exams done on all ED adult patients. 3 months of data was collected using the conventional workflow and 3 months of data was collected after implementation of the off-console workflow. Exam begin and the exam end timestamps were collected from the EMR. Additionally, 4 subgroups from the above conventional and off-console workflows were identified retrospectively with an Emergency Severity Index level 1, undergoing one of the four most common CT exam set(s) performed on ESI level 1 patients., Results: 6,795 ED adult patients underwent ED CT in the 3 months immediately prior to implementation of the off-console workflow and 6,708 adult ED patients underwent CT in the 3 months after complete implementation. The off-console workflow demonstrated a 36% decrease in median exam begin to end times (P < 0.001). 4 subgroups demonstrated 56-75% decreases in median CT occupied time (P < 0.001) and decreases in variability in ¾ subgroups., Discussion: This off-console workflow enables increased CT capacity to meet rising ED demand. Similar improvements could be expected across most exam sets and imaging settings if broadly implemented., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER).)

Objectives: To assess the usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictive factor of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) with acute abdominal pain.Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of patients older than 16 years admitted to the ED with acute abdominal pain with CT and histologic confirmation. The study group corresponded to patients with abdominal CT with radiological signs of AMI. The control group corresponded to patients with non-AMI findings in abdominal CT. Association measurements of NLR with radiological signs were compared with a paired-sample t test, and multivariate regression performed to analyze potential correlations. To assess the diagnosis capacity of NLR, ROC curves were calculated.Results: A total of 61 patients were included (32 cases and 29 controls). The cases of AMI showed higher mortality (43.8% vs 6.9%, p < 0.01) and higher NLR on the limit of statistical significance (13.8 vs 8.7, p = 0.053). Patients with AMI due to occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) showed a higher NLR (8.3 vs 22.3, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the NLR for AMI due to occlusion of the SMA was 0.88 (95% CI 0.7-1.0, p = 0.001). No patient with NLR < 5 presented AMI due to occlusion of the SMA. An NLR of 12.8 showed a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 74% for AMI due to occlusion of SMA.Conclusions: The NLR is a useful parameter of AMI of arterial origin due to occlusion of the SMA; it can help the clinician to raise suspicion of this diagnosis and the interpreting radiologist in the acquisition protocol for the CT study and would alert for an early surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The positive rate of head CT in non-trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is low. Currently, indications for imaging are based on the individual experience of the treating physician, which contributes to overutilization and variability in imaging utilization. The goals of this study are to ascertain the predictors of positive head CT in non-trauma patients and demonstrate feasibility of a clinical scoring algorithm to improve yield. We retrospectively reviewed 500 consecutive ED non-trauma patients evaluated with non-contrast head CT after presenting with headache, altered mentation, syncope, dizziness, or focal neurologic deficit. Medical records were assessed for clinical risk factors: focal neurologic deficit, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age. Data was analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and three derived algorithms. Positive CTs were found in 51 of 500 patients (10.2 %). Only two clinical factors were significant: focal neurologic deficit (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 20.7; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.4-45.7) and age >55 (adjusted OR 3.08; CI 1.44-6.56). Area under the ROC curve for all three algorithms was 0.73-0.83. In proposed algorithm C, only patients with focal neurologic deficit (major risk factor) or ≥2 of the five minor risk factors (altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age) would undergo CT imaging. This may reduce utilization by 34 % with only a small decrease in sensitivity (98 %). Our simple scoring algorithm utilizing multiple clinical risk factors could help to predict the non-trauma patients who will benefit from CT imaging, resulting in reduced radiation exposure without sacrificing sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In our emergency department (ED), patients with flank pain often undergo non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) to assess for nephroureteral (NU) stone. After immediate image review, decision is made regarding need for subsequent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to help assess for other causes of pain. This study aimed to review the experience of a single institution with this protocol and to assess the utility of CECT. Over a 6 month period, we performed a retrospective analysis on ED patients presenting with flank pain undergoing CT for a clinical diagnosis of nephroureterolithiasis. Patients initially underwent abdominopelvic NECT. The interpreting radiologist immediately decided whether to obtain a CECT to evaluate for another etiology of pain. Medical records, CT reports and images, and 7-day ED return were reviewed. CT diagnoses on NECT and CECT were compared. Additional information from CECT and changes in management as documented in the patient's medical record were noted. Three hundred twenty-two patients underwent NECT for obstructing NU stones during the study period. Renal or ureteral calculi were detected in 143/322 (44.4 %). One hundred fifty-four patients (47.8 %) underwent CECT. CECT added information in 17/322 cases (5.3 %) but only changed management in 6/322 patients (1.9 %). In four of these patients with final diagnosis of renal infarct, splenic infarct, pyelonephritis and early acute appendicitis in a thin patient, there was no abnormality on the NECT (4/322 patients, 1.2 %). In the remaining 2 patients, an abnormality was visible on the NECT. In patients presenting with flank pain with a clinical suspicion of nephroureterolithiasis, CECT may not be indicated. While CECT provided better delineation of an abnormality in 5.3 % of cases, changes in management after CECT occurred only in 2 %. This included 1 % of patients in whom a diagnosis of organ infarct, pyelonephritis or acute appendicitis in a thin patient could only be made on CECT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]