Search

Aberrant alternative pre-mRNA splicing (AS) events have been associated with several disorders. However, it is unclear whether deregulated AS directly contributes to disease. Here, we reveal a critical role of the AS regulator epithelial splicing regulator protein 1 (ESRP1) for intestinal homeostasis and pathogenesis. In mice, reduced ESRP1 function leads to impaired intestinal barrier integrity, increased susceptibility to colitis and altered colorectal cancer (CRC) development. Mechanistically, these defects are produced in part by modified expression of ESRP1-specific Gpr137 isoforms differently activating the Wnt pathway. In humans, ESRP1 is downregulated in inflamed biopsies from inflammatory bowel disease patients. ESRP1 loss is an adverse prognostic factor in CRC. Furthermore, generation of ESRP1-dependent GPR137 isoforms is altered in CRC and expression of a specific GPR137 isoform predicts CRC patient survival. These findings indicate a central role of ESRP1-regulated AS for intestinal barrier integrity. Alterations in ESRP1 function or expression contribute to intestinal pathology., eLife digest The lining of the intestine is just one cell thick, and yet it can act as an effective barrier between the inside of the body and the contents of the digestive system. This lining is often disturbed during bowel cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and other intestinal diseases, causing the barrier to fail and the gut to become leaky. These diseases often reduce patient life expectancy and quality of life. Intestinal epithelial cells make up the lining of the intestine and the normal activities of these cells are often disturbed during intestinal disease. In the intestine, a protein called ESRP1 is only found in epithelial cells, but its role in maintaining a healthy intestinal lining was not clear. Here, Mager et al. studied the intestines of mice that had been genetically engineered to produce a form of ESRP1 that is less active than normal. The experiments show that lower levels of ESRP1 activity leads to a broken intestinal barrier. The genetically engineered mice were more likely to develop inflammatory bowel disease and more aggressive forms of cancer. ESRP1 controls a gene that encodes another protein called GPR137, which helps to relay signals to the epithelial cells. Lower levels of ESRP1 resulted in a longer form of the GPR137 protein being produced. This in turn affected the protein’s signaling role and disturbed the activities of intestinal epithelial cells. Further experiments on biopsies taken from patients with inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer revealed that these patients had lower levels of ESRP1 compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, low levels of ESRP1 and increased levels of the long version of GPR137 were associated with poorer outcomes for cancer patients. Together, these findings may help us to better understand how the intestinal barrier fails in mice and humans and could lead to new ways to monitor and treat intestinal disease.

Positive-sense RNA viruses hijack intracellular membranes that provide niches for viral RNA synthesis and a platform for interactions with host proteins. However, little is known about host factors at the interface between replicase complexes and the host cytoplasm. We engineered a biotin ligase into a coronaviral replication/transcription complex (RTC) and identified >500 host proteins constituting the RTC microenvironment. siRNA-silencing of each RTC-proximal host factor demonstrated importance of vesicular trafficking pathways, ubiquitin-dependent and autophagy-related processes, and translation initiation factors. Notably, detection of translation initiation factors at the RTC was instrumental to visualize and demonstrate active translation proximal to replication complexes of several coronaviruses. Collectively, we establish a spatial link between viral RNA synthesis and diverse host factors of unprecedented breadth. Our data may serve as a paradigm for other positive-strand RNA viruses and provide a starting point for a comprehensive analysis of critical virus-host interactions that represent targets for therapeutic intervention., eLife digest Coronaviruses can infect the nose and throat and are a main cause of the common cold. Infections are usually mild and short-lived, but sometimes they can turn nasty. In 2002 and 2012, two dangerous new coronaviruses emerged and caused diseases known as SARS and MERS. These viruses caused much more serious symptoms and in some cases proved deadly. The question is, why are some coronaviruses more dangerous than others? Scientists know that the body's response to virus infection can make a difference to whether someone had mild or severe disease. So, to understand why some coronaviruses cause a cold and others kill, they also need to learn how people react to virus infection. Coronaviruses hijack membranes inside cells and turn them into virus factories. Within these factories, the viruses build molecular machinery called replicase complexes to copy their genetic code, which is needed for the next generation of virus particles. The viruses steal and repurpose proteins from their host cell that will assist in the copying process. However, scientists do not yet know which host proteins are essential for the virus to multiply. So, to find out, V’kovski et al. developed a way to tag any host protein that came near the virus factories. The new technique involved attaching an enzyme called a biotin ligase to the replicase complex. This enzyme acts as a molecular label gun, attaching a chemical tag to any protein that comes within ten nanometres. The label gun revealed that more than 500 different proteins come into contact with the replicase complex. To find out what these proteins were doing, the next step was to switch off their genes one by one. This revealed the key cell machinery that coronaviruses hijack when they are replicating. It included the cell's cargo transport system, the waste disposal system, and the protein production system. Using these systems allows the viruses to copy their genetic code next to machines that can turn it straight into viral proteins. These new results provide clues about which proteins viruses actually need from their host cells. They also do not just apply to coronaviruses. Other viruses use similar strategies to complete their infection cycle. These findings could help researchers to understand more generally about how viruses multiply. In the future, this knowledge could lead to new ways to combat virus infections.