Search

The current study identified career-development profiles in a sample of 4815 Chinese adolescents (M[subscript age] = 16.19 years, SD = 0.67) and examined their associations with academic self-efficacy and academic motivation. The latent profile model was built on four facets of career development (career feeling, career belief, career exploration, and career planning). The results identified three profiles: "high career exploration and planning" (N = 225, 6.00%), "low career development" (N = 907, 22.13%), and "average career development" (N = 3224, 71.91%). Those showing "high career exploration and planning" showed significantly higher levels of academic self-efficacy and academic motivation than those showing the other two profiles. The results indicated non-monotonous patterns and asynchronous associations and developmental trajectories among the facets of career development among adolescents. Important implications for career education can be drawn based on the findings from the relations among career-development profiles, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation.

Numerous studies have suggested that academic stress has negative impact on adolescents' psychological function, few of those studies, however, considered whether and how the impact of stress on adolescents' emotional states is moderated by corresponding regulation. This study aimed to examine the fluctuation of emotional states before and after the mid-term examination and the influence of different emotional regulatory strategies. In the present study, 72 adolescents aged 12-18 reported their emotional states and corresponding regulation before and after mid-term examination up to six times over a period of two weeks. Results showed that: (a) On the sampling day, the participants reported increasingly emotional states as time went by. Improvement of adolescents' daily emotional states was more significant after the mid-term examination. Participants reported decreasingly positive emotional states and increasingly negative ones as time went by before mid-term examination. (b) Adolescents who used down-regulation at a certain sampling moment reported more pleasant emotional states at the subsequent sampling moment than those who used up-regulation. Adolescents who used more up-regulation in a negative emotional event reported more negative emotional states at the subsequent sampling moment after the mid-term examination.

The current study identified career-development profiles in a sample of 4815 Chinese adolescents (Mage = 16.19 years, SD = 0.67) and examined their associations with academic self-efficacy and academic motivation. The latent profile model was built on four facets of career development (career feeling, career belief, career exploration, and career planning). The results identified three profiles: high career exploration and planning (N = 225, 6.00%), low career development (N = 907, 22.13%), and average career development (N = 3224, 71.91%). Those showing high career exploration and planning showed significantly higher levels of academic self-efficacy and academic motivation than those showing the other two profiles. The results indicated non-monotonous patterns and asynchronous associations and developmental trajectories among the facets of career development among adolescents. Important implications for career education can be drawn based on the findings from the relations among career-development profiles, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerous studies have suggested that academic stress has negative impact on adolescents’ psychological function, few of those studies, however, considered whether and how the impact of stress on adolescents’ emotional states is moderated by corresponding regulation. This study aimed to examine the fluctuation of emotional states before and after the mid-term examination and the influence of different emotional regulatory strategies. In the present study, 72 adolescents aged 12–18 reported their emotional states and corresponding regulation before and after mid-term examination up to six times over a period of two weeks. Results showed that: (a) On the sampling day, the participants reported increasingly emotional states as time went by. Improvement of adolescents’ daily emotional states was more significant after the mid-term examination. Participants reported decreasingly positive emotional states and increasingly negative ones as time went by before mid-term examination. (b) Adolescents who used down-regulation at a certain sampling moment reported more pleasant emotional states at the subsequent sampling moment than those who used up-regulation. Adolescents who used more up-regulation in a negative emotional event reported more negative emotional states at the subsequent sampling moment after the mid-term examination. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]