1. Demographic controls of aboveground forest biomass across North America
- Author
-
Hongcheng Zeng, Jeremy W. Lichstein, Georges Kunstler, Mark C. Vanderwel, John P. Caspersen, UNIVERSITY OF REGINA CAN, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO CAN, Ecosystèmes montagnards (UR EMGR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), and Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Biodiversity ,Forests ,Models, Biological ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Competition (biology) ,Time ,Trees ,Ecosystem ,Biomass ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,media_common ,Biomass (ecology) ,biology ,Ecology ,Mortality rate ,food and beverages ,15. Life on land ,biology.organism_classification ,Productivity (ecology) ,North America ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Tree species ,Abies balsamea - Abstract
International audience; Ecologists have limited understanding of how geographic variation in forest carbon arises from differences in growth and mortality at continental to global scales. Using forest inventory data from across North America, we partitioned continental-scale variation in biomass growth and mortality rates of 49 tree species groups into (1) species-independent spatial effects and (2) inherent differences in demographic performance among species groups. 82% and 51% of the respective variation in growth and mortality was explained by spatial factors that were independent of species-group composition. Moderate additional variation in mortality (26%) was related to species-group turnover across the continent. Biomass accumulation models showed that variation in forest biomass can be explained primarily by spatial gradients in growth that were unrelated to species-group composition. Species-dependent patterns of mortality explained additional variation in biomass, with forests supporting less biomass when dominated by species groups that are highly susceptible to competition or to biotic disturbances.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF