1. Establishing quantitative benchmarks for soil erosion and ecological monitoring, assessment, and management.
- Author
-
Webb, Nicholas P., Edwards, Brandon L., Heller, Alexandra, McCord, Sarah E., Schallner, Jeremy W., Treminio, Ronald S., Wheeler, Brandi E., Stauffer, Nelson G., Spiegal, Sheri, Duniway, Michael C., Traynor, Alexander C.E., Kachergis, Emily, and Houdeshell, Carrie-Ann
- Subjects
- *
ENVIRONMENTAL monitoring , *SOIL erosion , *SEDIMENT transport , *ECOLOGICAL assessment , *BENCHMARKING (Management) , *LAND management - Abstract
• Unprecedented monitoring datasets are available to support land health assessments. • Benchmarks enable objective and actionable data-informed management decisions. • Framework for establishing benchmarks and illustrated examples are presented. • Potential caveats and best practices for benchmarking approaches are described. • Future research needs identified for benchmark research and applications. Soil erosion can have a multitude of negative impacts on agroecosystems and society and there remains an urgent need for tools to support its management. Quantitative benchmarks based on holistic understanding of erosion processes, ecosystem function, and land use objectives can be used with monitoring data and models to inform assessments and make objective and actionable decisions about erosion management. However, managers currently lack a framework for establishing benchmarks. Here, we present a framework and evaluation of different approaches to establishing quantitative benchmarks for soil erosion and ecological monitoring and assessment that can inform land management decisions. We use monitoring data collected across Chihuahuan Desert ecosystems in the United States and an aeolian sediment transport model to illustrate how benchmarks can be established. Approaches include establishing benchmarks from relationships between soil erosion indicators, reference states and land potential, including state-and-transition models, and desired conditions from existing monitoring data. We discuss the benefits and caveats of the different approaches and show how combining different benchmarking approaches can help users ensure that benchmarks appropriately reflect thresholds for soil erosion and achievable management outcomes. We finish by identifying future research needs to support establishment and application of erosion benchmarks across agroecosystems and recognize the opportunity to extend the benchmarking approaches to management of other agroecosystem processes and services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF