Search

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the mean and extreme surface air temperature and precipitation in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) multimodel ensemble simulations over the Tibetan Plateau. Simulations from 29 climate models are compared against gridded observations for the period 1961–2012. Results show that models reasonably reproduce the overall spatial patterns of the 1961–2012 averages of seasonal mean temperature and precipitation. Nevertheless, models tend to underestimate mean temperature and overestimate precipitation accumulations. To be specific, the multimodel mean estimates of seasonal average temperatures over the plateau are 0.5°C–2.6°C colder than observed, while the corresponding estimates of seasonal precipitation accumulations are 218% (spring: March–May), 76% (summer: June–August), 129% (autumn: September–November), and 533% (winter: December–February) of those observed. As in observations, models also well capture increasing trend of mean temperature and precipitation in all seasons but underestimate the rates of increasing trends for both variables in all seasons. Models' ability to simulate temperature and precipitation extremes is also evaluated in terms of a set of chosen extreme indices defined by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices. On average, models tend to underestimate the averages of annual maximum daily maximum temperature, annual minimum daily minimum temperature, frost days, warm nights, and consecutive dry days but overestimate the corresponding averages of annual maximum 5‐day precipitation accumulations and simply daily intensity. Generally, models are able to simulate the signs of the trends in extreme indices but underestimate their magnitudes and misrepresent spatial patterns. Key Points: CMIP6 models reasonably reproduce the spatial patterns and temporal variations of mean and extreme temperature and precipitationCMIP6 models continue to suffer from cold bias in temperature and wet bias in precipitation similar as its predecessor CMIP5Most models underestimate the observed trends in mean and extreme temperature and precipitation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surface air temperatures affect a diverse set of physical and biological systems in many parts of the world. For regional‐scale studies, gridded surface air temperature data sets are frequently used as input variables. Here we evaluate 10 commonly used gridded air temperature products with spatial resolutions ranging from 0.1° × 0.1° to 5.0° × 5.0°, relative to observations from in situ weather stations on the Tibetan Plateau. Gridded temperatures are consistently lower, with mean annual air temperature biases ranging from −4.68 °C to −1.72 °C, and root mean square error (RMSE) from 3.24 °C to 6.11 °C. The mean biases of mean seasonal air temperatures for spring, summer, autumn, and winter are −3.21 °C, −2.98 °C, −2.89 °C, and −2.98 °C, respectively, and RMSEs of 4.81 °C, 4.39 °C, 4.3 °C, and 4.7 °C. Of all 10 products, the China meteorological forcing data set compares best with observations. Annual and season temperatures all increase significantly during 1980–2018 on the Tibetan Plateau, with winter dominating the warming rate. Key Points: Out of 10 assessed gridded products, the China meteorological forcing data set compares best with temperature observationsTibetan Plateau temperatures increase significantly during 1980–2018, with winter dominating the warming rateThe limitations related to the irregular spatial distribution of in‐situ sites in this complex terrain, especially elevation biases result in uncertainties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]