1. Effect of enhanced ionizing radiation on the cloud electricity after the Fukushima nuclear accident
- Author
-
Masahiko Takeda, Masatoshi Yamauchi, and Shingo Nagamachi
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Fukushima Nuclear Accident ,lcsh:Geodesy ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Ionizing radiation ,Nuclear physics ,Electrical resistivity and conductivity ,Electric field ,Radioactive contamination ,Potential gradient ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,lcsh:QB275-343 ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,Gamma ray ,lcsh:Geography. Anthropology. Recreation ,Cloud charges ,Geology ,Electric shielding ,lcsh:Geology ,Atmospheric electricity ,lcsh:G ,Space and Planetary Science ,Radioactive aerosol ,Fukushima nuclear accident - Abstract
The vertical downward component of the DC atmospheric electric field, or potential gradient (PG), at Kakioka 150 km southwest of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP1) was analyzed before and after the FNPP1 accident to examine possible influence of floating radioactive particles on the PG under the highly electrified clouds. Using 1-min PG data from March 13 to April 30 (late April 2011 corresponding to the time when floating radioactive materials decreased significantly) from 2006 to 2015, time profiles to/from the PG peaks (< $$-\,100$$ or > $$+\,100\,\hbox {V/m}$$ ) for 2011 are compared with other years. The PG developed toward and decays from its negative peaks faster in the first 50 days after the FNPP1 accident than for the same period in other years, making the 10-min averaged PG values for the same negative PG peak higher (smaller in terms of absolute value) during the first 50 days after the FNPP1 accident than those in other years in the study period, while the distribution of peak PG values is similar between 2011 and the other years. The observed shortening of the timescale is symmetric between the rise and decay and is the most clear when the negative PG peak is about $$-\,200$$ to $$-\,400\,\hbox {V/m}$$ . For positive peaks, the change of the baseline resulting from the radioactive contamination on the ground in 2011 caused superficial difference on such time profiles. Otherwise, there are no significant difference between 2011 and the other years. Possible explanations based on increased ionizing radiation from floating radioactive particles, which are found to be concentrated at low altitudes ( $$
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF