Search

Hydrological extremes, such as droughts and floods, can trigger a complex web of compound and cascading impacts (CCI) due to interdependencies between coupled natural and social systems. However, current decision‐making processes typically only consider one impact and disaster event at a time, ignoring causal chains, feedback loops, and conditional dependencies between impacts. Analyses capturing these complex patterns across space and time are thus needed to inform effective adaptation planning. This perspective paper aims to bridge this critical gap by presenting methods for assessing the dynamics of the multi‐sector CCI of hydrological extremes. We discuss existing challenges, good practices, and potential ways forward. Rather than pursuing a single methodological approach, we advocate for methodological pluralism. We see complementary or even convergent roles for analyses based on quantitative (e.g., data‐mining, systems modeling) and qualitative methods (e.g., mental models, qualitative storylines). The data‐driven and knowledge‐driven methods provided here can serve as a useful starting point for understanding the dynamics of both high‐frequency CCI and low‐likelihood but high‐impact CCI. With this perspective, we hope to foster research on CCI to improve the development of adaptation strategies for reducing the risk of hydrological extremes. Plain Language Summary: Droughts and floods can have significant impacts on both natural and social systems. These impacts are often interconnected, resulting in a complex chain of events. In this perspective paper, we aim to assist researchers in understanding the dynamics of compound and cascading impacts (CCI) caused by hydrological extremes. We provide an overview of various methods that can be utilized to assess and analyze interconnected impacts. To begin, we address the ongoing challenges associated with CCI research, such as the limited availability of comprehensive impact data spanning multiple sectors and over extended periods. Subsequently, we present a range of qualitative and quantitative methods that can be employed to analyze CCI dynamics, supported by case study examples. Finally, we conclude with six recommendations to advance the research in this field. Key Points: Systematic efforts to collect data on impacts across multiple sectors, systems, and years are requiredMethodological pluralism is necessary to fully address the complexity of compound and cascading impacts (CCI) and their underlying risk driversInvestigation of the risks of multi‐sector impacts should be guided not only by probability but also by plausibility considerations [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]