1. A realist review of digitally delivered child development assessment and screening tools: Psychometrics and considerations for future use.
- Author
-
Komanchuk, Jelena, Cameron, Judy L., Kurbatfinski, Stefan, Duffett-Leger, Linda, and Letourneau, Nicole
- Subjects
- *
PSYCHOMETRICS , *TODDLERS development , *CHILD development , *DIGITAL technology , *INFANT development , *NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests , *INTER-observer reliability - Abstract
Developmental screening improves the detection of developmental concerns, yet numerous children are not screened/assessed. Remote child developmental tool administration has been utilized to increase screening and assessment accessibility. We conducted a realist review to: (1) identify existing multi-domain child development assessment and screening tools for children 0–5 years; (2) review psychometric data on their digital (i.e., only administered remotely) administration; and (3) explore contextual factors relevant to their digital administration. We searched APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ERIC to identify tools and papers on their psychometrics. We reference-searched included articles and searched Google for relevant grey literature. Of 33 multi-domain child development tools identified in objective one, five tools (in five studies) were delivered digitally and compared to traditional (e.g., paper) delivery (i.e., objective two). Studies evaluated within-group equivalence reliability (k = 2) and between-group equivalence (k = 3). Within-group equivalence reliability was established for the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, and domains (e.g., gross motor) of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires 2nd edition (ASQ-2) and Revised Prescreening Denver Questionnaire (R-PDQ). Between group equivalence was demonstrated for Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd Edition (NEPSY-II) subtests and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition (Bayley-3) items. In another between group evaluation, web-based and paper versions of the ASQ-2 were deemed generally equivalent. Digital Bayley-3 inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.82 to 1.0. Examiner support, time, tool modifications, family resources, and comfort promotion supported digital administration. Digitally delivered ASQ-2, R-PDQ, Vineland, and Bayley-3 and NEPSY-II components show promise for equivalence with traditional administration. • Digital child development tools may increase assessments of more children. • Digital and traditionally delivered screening and assessment tools were compared. • Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, ASQ-2, R-PDQ, Bayley-3, and NEPSY-II were evaluated. • Promise shown for digital child developmental tool administration. • Digital delivery facilitated by support, comfort, and consideration of resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF