Search

Objectives: This study aims to develop deep learning (DL) models for the quantitative prediction of hearing thresholds based on stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) evoked by swept tones., Design: A total of 174 ears with normal hearing and 388 ears with sensorineural hearing loss were studied. SFOAEs in the 0.3 to 4.3 kHz frequency range were recorded using linearly swept tones at a rate of 2 Hz/msec, with stimulus level changing from 40 to 60 dB SPL in 10 dB steps. Four DL models were used to predict hearing thresholds at octave frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz. The models-a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN), a hybrid CNN-k-nearest neighbor (KNN), a hybrid CNN-support vector machine (SVM), and a hybrid CNN-random forest (RF)-were individually built for each frequency. The input to the DL models was the measured raw SFOAE amplitude spectra and their corresponding signal to noise ratio spectra. All DL models shared a CNN-based feature self-extractor. They differed in that the conventional CNN utilized a fully connected layer to make the final regression decision, whereas the hybrid CNN-KNN, CNN-SVM, and CNN-RF models were designed by replacing the last fully connected layer of CNN model with a traditional machine learning (ML) regressor, that is, KNN, SVM, and RF, respectively. The model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error and SE averaged over 20 repetitions of 5 × 5 fold nested cross-validation. The performance of the proposed DL models was compared with two types of traditional ML models., Results: The proposed SFOAE-based DL models resulted in an optimal mean absolute error of 5.98, 5.22, 5.51, and 6.06 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, superior to that obtained by the traditional ML models. The produced SEs were 8.55, 7.27, 7.58, and 7.95 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively. All the DL models outperformed any of the traditional ML models., Conclusions: The proposed swept-tone SFOAE-based DL models were capable of quantitatively predicting hearing thresholds with satisfactory performance. With DL techniques, the underlying relationship between SFOAEs and hearing thresholds at disparate frequencies was explored and captured, potentially improving the diagnostic value of SFOAEs., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) occurs commonly as part of mitochondriopathies and varies in severity and onset. In this study, we characterized hearing with specific consideration for hearing loss as a potential early indicator of mitochondrial disease (MD). We hypothesize that genetic testing at the earliest detection of SNHL may lead to an earlier MD diagnosis., Design: We reviewed the clinical and audiometric data of 49 patients undergoing genetic testing for MD., Results: One-third of individuals with molecularly confirmed MD presented with SNHL. On average, patients had hearing loss at least 10 years before genetic testing. The collective audiometric profile includes mild to moderate SNHL at lower frequencies and moderate SNHL at 2 kHz and higher frequencies., Conclusions: This study suggests that screening for SNHL could be an early indicator of MD. We propose that the audiometric profile for those with a MD diagnosis may have clinical triage utility., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common cause of nongenetic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children. We examined the longitudinal hearing outcomes of children with cCMV in relation to their newborn hearing screening findings, and their use of antiviral therapy., Design: The study was based on a retrospective chart review using a database of pediatric patients (N = 445) seen at the University of Minnesota Lions clinic. Chart review identified infants with cCMV, and records were reviewed for information about universal newborn hearing screen (UNHS) results, the clinical course of SNHL, and the use of antiviral therapy., Results: A total of 44 children were identified with cCMV. In this group, 33 (75%) had SNHL of varying degree and age at onset. Notably, 17 (39%) children passed UNHS bilaterally. Of those children, 6 (35%) ultimately acquired bilateral or unilateral SNHL, detected at a mean age of 20 months (median age, 12 months). Five out of 10 children (50%) that did not pass UNHS in one ear acquired late-onset hearing loss in the contralateral ear, identified at a mean age of 24 months (median age, 4 months). Eleven (25%) children passed UNHS bilaterally and continued to demonstrate normal hearing in both ears at their most recent follow-up visit at a mean age of 19 months (SD, 18 months). Of the 33 children with cCMV and SNHL, 18 (55%) received antiviral medication (ganciclovir and/or valganciclovir). While, on average, both treated and untreated ears experienced a progression of hearing loss over time, the group that received antiviral treatment experienced less overall hearing change compared with the untreated group (baseline-adjusted expected mean difference, -10.5 dB; 95% confidence interval, -28.1 to 7.2 dB)., Conclusions: Among children with cCMV included in this study who passed UNHS in both ears, 35% demonstrated delayed-onset SNHL. Notably, of those children who referred unilaterally, 50% later demonstrated SNHL in the contralateral ear. These findings have implications for audiological monitoring, and potentially antiviral therapy, of children with cCMV. As implementation of universal cCMV screening moves forward, a key aspect of follow-up will be appropriate long-term audiologic monitoring., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: An unexpectedly low word recognition (WR) score may be taken as evidence of increased risk for retrocochlear tumor. We sought to develop evidence for or against using a standardized WR (sWR) score in detecting retrocochlear tumors. The sWR is a z score expressing the difference between an observed WR score and a Speech Intelligibility Index-based predicted WR score. We retrospectively compared the sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone asymmetry-based logistic regression models that incorporated either the sWR or the raw WR scores in detecting tumor cases. Two pure-tone asymmetry calculations were used: the 4-frequency pure-tone asymmetry (AAO) calculation of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and a 6-frequency pure-tone asymmetry (6-FPTA) calculation previously optimized to detect retrocochlear tumors. We hypothesized that a regression model incorporating the 6-FPTA calculation and the sWR would more accurately detect retrocochlear tumors., Design: Retrospective data from all patients seen in the audiology clinic at Mayo Clinic in Florida in 2016 were reviewed. Cases with retrocochlear tumors were compared with a reference group with noise- or age-related hearing loss or idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss. Two pure-tone-based logistic regression models were created (6-FPTA and AAO). Into these base models, WR variables (WR, sWR, WR asymmetry [WRΔ], and sWR asymmetry [sWRΔ]) were added. Tumor detection performance for each regression model was compared twice: first, using all qualifying cases (61 tumor cases; 2332 reference group cases), and second, using a data set filtered to exclude hearing asymmetries greater than would be expected from noise-related or age-related hearing loss (25 tumor cases; 2208 reference group cases). The area under the curve and the DeLong test for significant receiver operating curve differences were used as outcome measures., Results: The 6-FPTA model significantly outperformed the AAO model-with or without the addition of WR or WRΔ variables. Including sWR into the AAO base regression model significantly improved disease detection performance. Including sWR into the 6-FPTA model significantly improved disease detection performance when large hearing asymmetries were excluded. In the data set that included large pure-tone asymmetries, area under the curve values for the 6-FPTA + sWR and AAO + sWR models were not significantly better than the base 6-FPTA model., Conclusions: The results favor the superiority of the sWR computational method in identifying reduced WR scores in retrocochlear cases. The utility would be greatest where undetected tumor cases are embedded in a population heavily representing age- or noise-related hearing loss. The results also demonstrate the superiority of the 6-FPTA model in identifying tumor cases. The 2 computational methods may be combined (ie, the 6-FPTA + sWR model) into an automated tool for detecting retrocochlear disease in audiology and community otolaryngology clinics. The 4-frequency AAO-based regression model was the weakest detection method considered. Including raw WR scores into the model did not improve performance, whereas including sWR into the model did improve tumor detection performance. This further supports the contribution of the sWR computational method for recognizing low WR scores in retrocochlear disease cases., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Confidence levels were established to determine if a word-recognition score is within the expected range for a hearing loss group (based on 3-frequency pure-tone average) or significantly below or above the expected range., Design: Two large clinical databases were mined to produce data-sets composed of word-recognition scores obtained with Q/MASS NU-6 materials and VA NU-6 materials for patients with average hearing losses ranging from 0 to 70 dB HL. Percentiles representing scores that are below (2.5%, 5%, and 10%) and above (90%, 95%, and 97.5%) the expected range (defined as the 80% confidence interval) were established. To estimate the distribution of scores and percentiles for the Auditec NU-6 materials (for which a large database is not available) Q/MASS scores were transformed to Auditec scores based on published psychometric functions., Results: The resulting confidence levels and expected ranges of word-recognition scores should be useful for interpreting the relationship between a score and the distribution of scores for the patient's hearing loss severity. Confidence levels are described as low, moderate, and high corresponding to the statistical level of assurance that a score is lower or higher than the expected score., Conclusions: The confidence levels and expected ranges may be helpful for interpreting word-recognition scores obtained with three widely used sets of NU-6 test materials., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study compared the measurement of the acoustic stapedius reflex threshold (ART) obtained using a traditional method with that obtained using an automated adaptive wideband (AAW) method. Participants included three groups of adults with normal hearing (NH), mild sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), or moderate SNHL. The purpose of the study was to compare ARTs for the three groups and to determine which method had the best performance in detecting SNHL., Design: Ipsilateral and contralateral ARTs were obtained using 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz tonal activators, and broadband noise (BBN) activators on a traditional admittance system (Clinical) at tympanometric peak pressures (TPP) and on an experimental wideband system using an AAW method at both ambient pressure and TPP. ART data previously reported for 39 NH adults with a mean age of 47.7 years were compared with data for 25 participants with mild SNHL with a mean age of 63.8 years, and 20 participants with moderate SNHL with a mean age of 65.7 years. Differences in ARTs between the normal-hearing and SNHL groups for the three methods were examined using a General Linear Model Repeated-Measures test. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was also used to determine the ability of an ART test to detect SNHL., Results: For the 0.5 kHz activator condition, there were no significant group mean differences in ART between NH and SNHL groups for either ipsilateral or contralateral activator presentation modes for the Clinical or AAW methods. There were significant group mean differences for the 1 and 2 kHz tonal activators and BBN activator for both ipsilateral and contralateral modes with greater differences in ART between groups for the AAW method than the Clinical method. In these conditions, the mean ART was lower for the AAW tests relative to the Clinical test. The greatest difference between groups was for the ipsilateral AAW tests for the comparison of NH with moderate SNHL for the BBN activator. This difference was approximately 20 dB for the AAW tests and 8 dB for the Clinical test. The ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) increased with the frequency of the activator stimulus and with the degree of hearing loss and was maximal for the BBN activator for both the AAW and Clinical methods for both ipsilateral and contralateral presentations., Conclusions: For ipsilateral and contralateral ART tests for activator frequencies above 0.5 kHz and BBN, listeners with SNHL generally had elevated ARTs compared with those with NH. The AAW method resulted in greater differences between SNHL groups and NH than the Clinical method. The AUC for detecting SNHL also increased with activator frequency and degree of hearing loss and was greatest for the BBN activator for the AAW method in both the ambient and TPP conditions. The results are encouraging for the use of an AAW ART method for the assessment of individuals with SNHL., Competing Interests: D.H.K. is involved in commercializing new technology for the screening and diagnosis of middle-ear and cochlear disorders. Otherwise, the authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) Service through a Merit Review Award (C1268-R) to the first and second authors, a Center award to the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (C2361-C), and a Research Enhancement Award Program award, Hearing and Balance Research Program (C9221-F)., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: As children with sensorineural hearing loss have an increased risk for vestibular impairment, the Vestibular Infant Screening-Flanders project implemented a vestibular screening by means of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) at the age of 6 months for each child with hearing loss in Flanders (Belgium). Given that vestibular deficits can affect the child's development, this vestibular screening should allow early detection and intervention. However, less is currently known about which screening tool would be the most ideal and how vestibular impairment can evolve. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the most appropriate tool to screen for vestibular deficits, to assess the necessity of vestibular follow-up, and to set clinical guidelines for vestibular screening in children with hearing loss., Design: In total, 71 children with congenital or early-onset sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled (mean age at first appointment = 6.7 months). Follow-up was provided at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years of age. Below three years of age, the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) of the horizontal semicircular canals (SCC), the cVEMP, and the rotatory test at 0.16, 0.04, and 0.01 Hz were applied. At 3 years of age, the vHIT of the vertical SCC and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) were added. To evaluate early motor development, the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) results at 6 months and 1-year old were included., Results: At 6 months of age, the highest success rate was obtained with the cVEMP (90.0%) compared to the vHIT (70.0%) and the rotatory test (34.3-72.9%). Overall, vestibular deficits were found in 20.0% of the children, consisting of 13.9% with both SCC and otolith deficits (bilateral: 9.3%, unilateral: 4.6%), and 6.1% with unilateral isolated SCC (4.6%) or otolith (1.5%) deficits. Thus, vestibular deficits would not have been detected in 4.6% of the children by only using the cVEMP, whereas 1.5% would have been missed when only using the vHIT. Although vestibular deficits were more frequently found in severe to profound hearing loss (28.6%), characteristics of vestibular function were highly dependent on the underlying etiology. The AIMS results showed significantly weaker early motor development in children with bilateral vestibular deficits ( p = 0.001), but could not differentiate children with bilateral normal vestibular function from those with unilateral vestibular deficits ( p > 0.05). Progressive or delayed-onset vestibular dysfunction was only found in a few cases (age range: 12-36 months), in which the hearing loss was mainly caused by congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV)., Conclusions: The cVEMP is the most feasible screening tool to assess vestibular function in 6-months-old children with hearing loss. Although the majority of children with vestibular deficits are detected with the cVEMP, the vHIT seems even more sensitive as isolated SCC deficits are associated with specific etiologies of hearing loss. As a result, the cVEMP is an appropriate vestibular screening tool, which is advised at least in severe to profound hearing loss, but certain etiologies require the addition of the vHIT (i.e., cCMV, meningitis, cochleovestibular anomalies with or without syndromic hearing loss)., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure how parent concern about childhood hearing loss varies under different description conditions: classification-based, audibility-based, and simulation-based descriptions., Method: We randomly allocated study participants (n = 143) to complete an online survey about expected child difficulties with listening situations with hearing loss. Our participants were parents of children with typical hearing in the 0- to 12-month age range. Participants were exposed to one type of description (classification-based, audibility-based, or simulation-based) and one level of hearing loss (slight, mild, and moderate or their audibility and simulation equivalents), producing nine total groups. Participants rated the level of expected difficulty their child would experience performing age-appropriate listening tasks with the given hearing loss. They also selected what they perceived as the most appropriate intervention from a list of increasingly intense options., Results: Our findings revealed that audibility-based descriptions elicited significantly higher levels of parent concerns about hearing loss than classification-based strategies, but that simulation-based descriptions elicited the highest levels of concern. Those assigned to simulation-based and audibility-based groups also judged relatively more intense intervention options as appropriate compared to those assigned to classification-based groups., Conclusions: This study expands our knowledge base about descriptive factors that impact levels of parent concern about hearing loss after diagnosis. This has potentially cascading effects on later intervention actions such as fitting hearing technology. It also provides a foundation for developing and testing clinical applications of audibility-based counseling strategies., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest, financial, or otherwise., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent surveys of pediatric audiologists have highlighted the need for improved understanding of pediatric loudness perception and their role in the hearing device fitting process. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of methods used to measure loudness perception and summarize the existing literature exploring loudness perception in children. A narrative literature review was conducted and 29 articles were reviewed to (1) provide evidence for or against developmental differences, (2) describe variability across listeners of the same age, and (3) discuss evaluations of test-retest reliability on measures of loudness discomfort levels (LDLs), loudness growth, and loudness balancing. A wide variety of methods have been used to measure loudness perception in children. Results of existing studies point to potential developmental differences in LDLs but relatively consistent growth of loudness across age. Considerable across-child variability of loudness perception suggests that estimating LDLs from hearing thresholds could introduce error into the hearing device fitting/mapping process. Additional areas in need of research include work using loudness balancing measures, improved understanding of how variations in clinical loudness scaling measures could influence measured loudness perception, and examination of the benefit of individually-measured loudness perception during pediatric hearing device fitting., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine etiology, comorbidities, and health service use in a cohort of children with permanent hearing loss. Receiving an etiological diagnosis can inform reproductive planning, rehabilitation outcomes, predict additional disabilities, and direct intervention or management decisions., Design: Retrospective audit of 518 deaf/hard-of-hearing children attending a tertiary pediatric outpatient clinic (2016-2019) using descriptive statistics. We used linear regression to investigate the relationship between degree of hearing loss, comorbidities, and health service use., Results: Of the 518 children who attended the clinic, 481 (92.9%) proceeded with testing for etiology. Most children (399/518, 77.0%) were diagnosed with hearing loss by 3 mo of age. Of the children tested, the cause of hearing loss was confirmed in 234/481 (48.6%), suspected in 113/481 (23.5%), and unknown in 134/481 (27.9%); 17/341 (5.0%) had congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV), 17/320 (5.3%) had enlarged vestibular aqueducts, 67/213 (31.5%) of children with bilateral hearing loss had connexin mutation, and 25/72 (34.7%) of children with unilateral loss had hypoplastic/absent cochlear nerve on imaging. The odds of having a definitive/suspected diagnosis were twice as likely for indivduals with profound hearing loss than mild hearing loss (OR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9; P = 0.02). The majority (348/518, 67.2%) of children had medical comorbidities, and most children attended otolaryngology (453/518, 87.5%), early intervention (358/518, 69.1%), and genetic (287/518, 55.4%) services., Conclusions: Children with hearing loss have diverse etiologies, most have comorbidities, and attend multiple services. Most families elected to proceed with diagnostic testing for etiology. Current guidelines and expanded access to genetic testing identified a confirmed/suspected etiological diagnosis in 72.1% of children tested. The number of comorbidities correlated with service use, regardless of hearing loss severity., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study identified an association between cholesteatoma and progressive sensorineural hearing loss using a large pediatric longitudinal audiologic dataset. Cholesteatoma is a potential sequela of chronic otitis media with effusion, a commonly observed auditory pathology that can contribute to hearing loss in children. The purpose of this report is to (i) describe the process of identifying the association between cholesteatoma and progressive sensorineural hearing loss in a large pediatric dataset and (ii) describe the audiologic data acquired over time in patients identified with cholesteatoma-associated progressive sensorineural hearing loss., Design: Records of patients included in the Audiologic and Genetics Database (n = 175,215 patients) were examined using specified criteria defining progressive hearing loss. A linear regression model examined the log frequency of all diagnostic codes in the electronic health record assigned to patients for a progressive hearing loss cohort compared with a stable hearing loss group. Based on findings from the linear regression analysis, longitudinal audiometric air (AC) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds were extracted for groups of subjects with cholesteatoma-associated progressive (n = 58 subjects) and stable (n = 55 subjects) hearing loss to further analyze changes in hearing over time., Results: The linear regression analyses identified that diagnostic codes for cholesteatoma were associated with progressive sensorineural hearing loss in children. The longitudinal audiometric data demonstrated within-subject changes in masked BC sensitivity consistent with progressive sensorineural hearing loss in children diagnosed with cholesteatoma. Additional analyses showed that mastoidectomy surgeries did not appear to contribute to the observed progressive hearing loss and that a high number of cholesteatoma patients with progressive hearing loss had normal-hearing thresholds at their first test., Conclusions: The statistical analyses demonstrated an association between cholesteatoma and pediatric progressive sensorineural hearing loss. These findings inform clinical management by suggesting that children with cholesteatoma diagnoses may be at increased risk for progressive sensorineural hearing loss and should receive continued monitoring even after a normal masked BC baseline has been established., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The threshold equalizing noise (TEN(HL)) is a clinically administered test to detect cochlear "dead regions" (i.e., regions of loss of inner hair cell [IHC] connectivity), using a "pass/fail" criterion based on the degree of elevation of a masked threshold in a tone-detection task. With sensorineural hearing loss, some elevation of the masked threshold is commonly observed but usually insufficient to create a "fail" diagnosis. The experiment reported here investigated whether the gray area between pass and fail contained information that correlated with factors such as age or cumulative high-level noise exposure (>100 dBA sound pressure levels), possibly indicative of damage to cochlear structures other than the more commonly implicated outer hair cells., Design: One hundred and twelve participants (71 female) who underwent audiometric screening for a sensorineural hearing loss, classified as either normal or mild, were recruited. Their age range was 32 to 74 years. They were administered the TEN test at four frequencies, 0.75, 1, 3, and 4 kHz, and at two sensation levels, 12 and 24 dB above their pure-tone absolute threshold at each frequency. The test frequencies were chosen to lie either distinctly away from, or within, the 2 to 6 kHz region where noise-induced hearing loss is first clinically observed as a notch in the audiogram. Cumulative noise exposure was assessed by the Noise Exposure Structured Interview (NESI). Elements of the NESI also permitted participant stratification by music experience., Results: Across all frequencies and testing levels, a strong positive correlation was observed between elevation of TEN threshold and absolute threshold. These correlations were little-changed even after noise exposure and music experience were factored out. The correlations were observed even within the range of "normal" hearing (absolute thresholds ≤15 dB HL)., Conclusions: Using a clinical test, sensorineural hearing deficits were observable even within the range of clinically "normal" hearing. Results from the TEN test residing between "pass" and "fail" are dominated by processes not related to IHCs. The TEN test for IHC-related function should therefore only be considered for its originally designed function, to generate a binary decision, either pass or fail., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: The digits-in-noise test (DIN) is a popular self-test measure that has traditionally been used to screen for hearing loss by providing either a pass or refer result. Standard approaches either tested each ear monaurally or used a binaural diotic version where identical digits and noise were presented simultaneously to both ears. Recently, a dichotic, antiphasic version was developed, increasing sensitivity of the DIN to unilateral or asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and conductive hearing loss (CHL). The purpose of this study was to determine predictors and normative ranges of the antiphasic and diotic DIN and to determine if a combination of diotic and antiphasic DIN could accurately categorize hearing into (1) normal, (2) bilateral SNHL, or (3) unilateral SNHL or CHL., Design: The analytical sample consisted of 489 participants between the ages of 18 and 92 years with varying types, symmetry, and degrees of hearing loss. Degree and type of hearing loss were determined based on standard clinical four-frequency (0.5-4 kHz) pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold averages. The sample consisted of bilateral normal hearing (n = 293), bilateral SNHL (n = 172), unilateral SNHL (n = 42), and CHL (n = 32). All participants (n = 489) first completed an antiphasic DIN (digit stimuli 180° out-of-phase between ears), while 393 of the sample also completed a diotic DIN. Two procedures were assessed for their ability to categorize hearing into one of the three hearing groups. The first used a fixed antiphasic cutoff combined with a cutoff formed by a linear combination of antiphasic and diotic speech recognition threshold (SRT) or binaural intelligibility-level difference., Results: Poorer ear pure-tone average was the strongest predictor of antiphasic DIN score, whereas better ear pure-tone average explained more of the variance in diotic SRT. The antiphasic DIN sensitivity and specificity was 90% and 84%, respectively, for detecting hearing loss, with outstanding area under the receiver operating characteristics values exceeding 0.93 to identify hearing loss in the poorer ear. The first fixed SRT cutoff procedure could categorize 75% of all participants correctly, while the second procedure increased correct categorization to 79%. False negative rates for both procedures were below 10%., Conclusions: A sequential antiphasic and diotic DIN could categorize hearing to a reasonable degree into three groups of (1) normal hearing; (2) bilateral SNHL; and (3) unilateral asymmetric SNHL or CHL. This type of approach could optimize care pathways using remote and contactless testing, by identifying unilateral SNHL and CHL as cases requiring medical referral. In contrast, bilateral SNHL cases could be referred directly to an audiologist, or nontraditional models like OTC hearing aids., Competing Interests: D.R.M. and D.W.S. have a relationship with the hearX Group (Pty) Ltd, which includes equity, consulting, and potential royalties. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate patterns of semicircular canal (SCC) and otolith organ dysfunction by vestibular mapping, and to determine the clinical implications of treatment outcomes in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 135 consecutive patients diagnosed with ISSNHL from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients underwent video-head impulse tests (vHIT) for each SCC, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test for the saccules, ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test for the utricles, and hearing tests. Hearing outcomes were evaluated according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria and factors associated with prognosis were assessed. We also conducted vestibular mapping assessments and hierarchical cluster analysis., Results: Overall, utricular impairment (76, 56.3%) was the most frequent diagnosis in the 135 ISSNHL patients, followed by saccular impairment (59, 43.7%) and posterior SCC impairment (30, 22.2%). The mean number of affected end organs was 1.37 ± 1.24, with higher numbers in the complete recovery group than in the partial/no recovery groups. In a multivariate analysis, higher initial hearing level and abnormal vHIT results in the posterior SCC were associated with poor prognosis in ISSNHL. In hierarchical cluster analysis, horizontal SCC and anterior SCC showed the highest similarity but were in different clusters than posterior SCC, and the saccule and utricle were in separate clusters from the three SCCs., Conclusions: The vestibular end organ showed various patterns of dysfunction in patients with ISSNHL. Of the five vestibular end organs, only abnormal posterior SCC was associated with poor prognosis for hearing recovery., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Permanent hearing loss is an important public health issue in children with consequences for language, social, and academic functioning. Early hearing detection, intervention, and monitoring are important in mitigating the impact of permanent childhood hearing loss. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a leading cause of hearing loss. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the evidence on the association between CMV infection and permanent childhood hearing loss., Design: We performed a systematic review and examined scientific literature from the following databases: MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, and CINAHL. The primary outcome was permanent bilateral or unilateral hearing loss with congenital onset or onset during childhood (birth to 18 years). The secondary outcome was progressive hearing loss. We included studies reporting data on CMV infection. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, nonrandomized comparative and noncomparative studies, and case series were considered. Data were extracted and the quality of individual studies was assessed with the Qualitative Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (McMaster University). The quality and strength of the evidence were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A narrative synthesis was completed., Results: Sixty-five articles were included in the review. Prevalence of hearing loss at birth was over 33% among symptomatic CMV-infected newborns and less than 15% in asymptomatic infections. This difference in prevalence was maintained during childhood with more than 40% prevalence reported for symptomatic and less than 30% for asymptomatic CMV. Late-onset and progressive hearing loss appear to be characteristic of congenital CMV infections. Definitions of hearing loss, degree of loss, and reporting of laterality varied across studies. All degrees and both bilateral and unilateral loss were reported, regardless of symptomatic and asymptomatic status at birth, and no conclusions about the characteristics of hearing loss could be drawn. Various patterns of hearing loss were reported including stable, progressive, and fluctuating, and improvement in hearing (sometimes to normal hearing) was documented. These changes were reported in children with symptomatic/asymptomatic congenital CMV infection, presenting with congenital/early onset/late-onset hearing loss and in children treated and untreated with antiviral medication., Conclusions: Symptomatic and asymptomatic congenital CMV infection should be considered a risk factor for hearing loss at birth and during childhood and for progressive hearing loss. Therefore, CMV should be included as a risk factor in screening and surveillance programs and be taken into account in clinical follow-up of children with hearing loss., Competing Interests: This work was supported by the Ministry of Children, Community, and Social Services to Western University (M. Bagatto) for its work in support of the Ontario Infant Hearing Program. There are no conflicts of interest, financial, or otherwise., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

For hearing aid users to experience everyday benefit from their hearing aids, research, development, and fitting of hearing aids must be performed using evaluation methods that are indicative of everyday performance. These evaluations can take place both in peoples' ordinary lives and in laboratory settings. For the results of laboratory testing to be ecologically valid, the selected test scenarios must capture the essence of everyday listening. The present article discusses the selection of these laboratory test scenarios in three parts. Part 1 reviews prior research on the selection of everyday listening situations for laboratory testing and discusses realistic test scenarios as important research tools. Part 2 presents findings from an ecological momentary assessments study in which 19 experienced hearing aid users reported real-time auditory reality data, including their current listening activity and their current sound environment. Participants categorized their listening situations according to the common sound scenarios framework and rated how often each situation occurred, how important it was to hear well, and how difficult it was to hear in the situation. These ratings made it possible to filter the data according to three criteria (occurrence, importance, and difficulty). The filtered data could potentially be used for selecting laboratory test scenarios. Part 3 uses the data from Part 2 and data from the studies reviewed in Part 1 to broadly explore the test scenarios that various selection criteria lead to. Further, implementation of test scenarios in the laboratory, and the strengths and limitations of data collection methods for investigating auditory reality are briefly discussed. The article concludes with a summary of the collected study.

Objectives: The objective of our study is to understand how listeners with and without sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) use energy and temporal envelope cues to detect tones in noise. Previous studies of low-frequency tone-in-noise detection have shown that when energy cues are made less reliable using a roving-level paradigm, thresholds of listeners with normal hearing (NH) are only slightly increased. This result is consistent with studies demonstrating the importance of temporal envelope cues for masked detection. In contrast, roving-level detection thresholds are more elevated in listeners with SNHL at the test frequency, suggesting stronger weighting of energy cues. The present study extended these tests to a wide range of frequencies and stimulus levels. The authors hypothesized that individual listeners with SNHL use energy and temporal envelope cues differently for masked detection at different frequencies and levels, depending on the degree of hearing loss., Design: Twelve listeners with mild to moderate SNHL and 12 NH listeners participated. Tone-in-noise detection thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in 1/3 octave bands of simultaneously gated Gaussian noise were obtained using a novel, two-part tracking paradigm. A track refers to the sequence of trials in an adaptive test procedure; the signal to noise ratio was the tracked variable. Each part of the track consisted of a two-alternative, two-interval, forced-choice procedure. The initial portion of the track estimated detection threshold using a fixed masker level. When the track continued, stimulus levels were randomly varied over a 20-dB rove range (±10 dB with respect to mean masker level), and a second threshold was estimated. Rove effect (RE) was defined as the difference between thresholds for the fixed- and roving-level tests. The size of the RE indicated how strongly a listener weighted energy-based cues for masked detection. Participants were tested at one to three masker levels per frequency, depending on audibility., Results: Across all stimulus frequencies and levels, NH listeners had small REs (≈1 dB), whereas listeners with SNHL typically had larger REs. Some listeners with SNHL had larger REs at higher frequencies, where pure-tone audiometric thresholds were typically elevated. RE did not vary significantly with masker level for either group. Increased RE for the SNHL group was consistent with simulations in which energy cues were more heavily weighted than envelope cues., Conclusions: Tone-in-noise detection thresholds in NH listeners were typically elevated only slightly by the roving-level paradigm at any frequency or level tested, consistent with the primary use of level-independent cues, such as temporal envelope cues that are conveyed by fluctuations in neural responses. In comparison, thresholds of listeners with SNHL were more affected by the roving-level paradigm, suggesting stronger weighting of energy cues. For listeners with SNHL, the largest RE was observed at 4000 Hz, for which pure-tone audiometric thresholds were most elevated. Specifically, RE size at 4000 Hz was significantly correlated with higher pure-tone audiometric thresholds at the same frequency, after controlling for the effect of age. Future studies will explore strategies for restoring or enhancing neural fluctuation cues that may lead to improved hearing in noise for listeners with SNHL.

Objectives: The digits-in-noise test (DIN) has become increasingly popular as a consumer-based method to screen for hearing loss. Current versions of all DINs either test ears monaurally or present identical stimuli binaurally (i.e., diotic noise and speech, NoSo). Unfortunately, presentation of identical stimuli to each ear inhibits detection of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and neither diotic nor monaural presentation sensitively detects conductive hearing loss (CHL). After an earlier finding of enhanced sensitivity in normally hearing listeners, this study tested the hypothesis that interaural antiphasic digit presentation (NoSπ) would improve sensitivity to hearing loss caused by unilateral or asymmetric SNHL, symmetric SNHL, or CHL., Design: This cross-sectional study recruited adults (18 to 84 years) with various levels of hearing based on a 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The study sample was comprised of listeners with normal hearing (n = 41; PTA ≤ 25 dB HL in both ears), symmetric SNHL (n = 57; PTA > 25 dB HL), unilateral or asymmetric SNHL (n = 24; PTA > 25 dB HL in the poorer ear), and CHL (n = 23; PTA > 25 dB HL and PTA air-bone gap ≥ 20 dB HL in the poorer ear). Antiphasic and diotic speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were compared using a repeated-measures design., Results: Antiphasic DIN was significantly more sensitive to all three forms of hearing loss than the diotic DIN. SRT test-retest reliability was high for all tests (intraclass correlation coefficient r > 0.89). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for detection of hearing loss (>25 dB HL) was higher for antiphasic DIN (0.94) than for diotic DIN (0.77) presentation. After correcting for age, PTA of listeners with normal hearing or symmetric SNHL was more strongly correlated with antiphasic (rpartial[96] = 0.69) than diotic (rpartial = 0.54) SRTs. Slope of fitted regression lines predicting SRT from PTA was significantly steeper for antiphasic than diotic DIN. For listeners with normal hearing or CHL, antiphasic SRTs were more strongly correlated with PTA (rpartial[62] = 0.92) than diotic SRTs (rpartial[62] = 0.64). Slope of the regression line with PTA was also significantly steeper for antiphasic than diotic DIN. The severity of asymmetric hearing loss (poorer ear PTA) was unrelated to SRT. No effect of self-reported English competence on either antiphasic or diotic DIN among the mixed first-language participants was observed., Conclusions: Antiphasic digit presentation markedly improved the sensitivity of the DIN test to detect SNHL, either symmetric or asymmetric, while keeping test duration to a minimum by testing binaurally. In addition, the antiphasic DIN was able to detect CHL, a shortcoming of previous monaural or binaurally diotic DIN versions. The antiphasic DIN is thus a powerful tool for population-based screening. This enhanced functionality combined with smartphone delivery could make the antiphasic DIN suitable as a primary screen that is accessible to a large global audience.

Objectives: Although the educational achievement gap between people without hearing loss and people with hearing loss is well-documented, few studies are based on large, nonclinical samples. The present study aims to investigate the educational attainment among Norwegian adults diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss as children, compared with a matched control group of people without hearing loss., Design: A prospective cohort design was applied. Between 1954 and 1986, the children in the first, fourth, and/or seventh grade in all primary schools in Nord-Trøndelag County participated in the School Hearing Investigation in Nord-Trøndelag, in which they underwent audiometric screening. Those with positive results had their hearing further tested by means of pure tone audiometry at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz with air- and bone-conduction thresholds, as well as a full examination by an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist. In the present study, 216 persons were classified with moderate-severe hearing loss (41 to 100 dB HL), 293 with mild hearing loss (26 to 40 dB HL), and 240 with slight hearing loss (16 to 25 dB HL). Age-matched controls were recruited from the Norwegian Health Study, which was conducted in the same county. A total of 48,606 people participated in the present study. Data on educational attainment up to 2014 was provided by Statistics Norway. Control variables comprised sex, age, mothers', and fathers' education. The relation between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and educational attainment was tested by means of multinomial logistic regression models; first for the total sample (born between 1941 and 1979), and then for two different birth cohorts born between 1941 and 1959 and between 1960 and 1979., Results: Percentwise, the educational attainment level in general has increased, both among people without hearing loss and people with hearing loss, and especially for women. However, 27.5% of people without hearing loss obtained higher education, whereas the corresponding numbers for those with mild or moderate-severe hearing loss were 18.8%, and 21.3%, respectively. The results from the regression analyses showed that in the total sample, compared with having primary education, people with moderate-severe or mild hearing loss were about half as likely to achieve higher education as people without hearing loss (odds ratio (OR) = 0.63 and 0.49, respectively). An interaction term between sensorineural hearing loss and sex was specified but it was not significant. In the older cohort, we found a significant association between mild hearing loss and higher education (OR = 0.40), and between moderate-severe hearing loss and secondary education (OR = 0.65). In the younger cohort, there was a significant association between mild hearing loss and higher education (OR = 0.56) and between slight hearing loss and secondary education (OR = 0.61)., Conclusions: The results from this study indicate that the achievement gap between people without hearing loss and those with hearing loss remains. Future studies should try to pinpoint what might be hindering people with slight, mild, moderate, or severe hearing loss in pursuing higher education. Parents, health personnel, institutions for higher education, and policy makers alike should take this into consideration when making plans and policies.

Objectives: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is a type of otoacoustic emission (OAE) that is calculated as a transfer function between forward pressure and reflected pressure. The purpose of this study was to compare wideband CR to distortion-product (DP) OAEs in two ways: (1) in a clinical-screening paradigm where the task is to determine whether an ear is normal or has hearing loss and (2) in the prediction of audiometric thresholds. The goal of the study was to assess the clinical utility of CR., Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 124 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at 3 stimulus levels (30, 40, 50 dB sound pressure level) was used to elicit the CR. DPOAEs were elicited using primary tones spanning a wide frequency range (1 to 16 kHz). Predictions of auditory status (i.e., hearing-threshold category) and predictions of audiometric threshold were based on regression analysis. Test performance (identification of normal versus impaired hearing) was evaluated using clinical decision theory., Results: When regressions were based only on physiological measurements near the audiometric frequency, the accuracy of CR predictions of auditory status and audiometric threshold was less than reported in previous studies using DPOAE measurements. CR predictions were improved when regressions were based on measurements obtained at many frequencies. CR predictions were further improved when regressions were performed on males and females separately., Conclusions: Compared with CR measurements, DPOAE measurements have the advantages in a screening paradigm of better test performance and shorter test time. The full potential of CR measurements to predict audiometric thresholds may require further improvements in signal-processing methods to increase its signal to noise ratio. CR measurements have theoretical significance in revealing the number of cycles of delay at each frequency that is most sensitive to hearing loss.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the impact of controlling cochlear-source mechanism on the accuracy with which auditory status is identified using otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in two groups of subjects with normal hearing (NH) and subjects with mild to moderate hearing loss., Design: Data were collected from 212 subjects with NH and with mild to moderate hearing loss who fell into two categories based on a distortion product OAE (DPOAE) screening protocol: the uncertain-identification group (where errors were likely) and the certain-identification group (where errors were unlikely). DPOAE fine-structure patterns were recorded at intervals surrounding f2 = 1, 2 and 4 kHz (f2/f1 ratio = 1.22), with L2 = 35, 45, and 55 dB SPL (L1/L2 ratio = 10 dB). The discrete cosine transform was used to smooth fine structure, limiting the source contribution to the distortion source only. Reflection-source OAEs were also recorded using amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency OAEs (AM-SFOAE). Area under the relative operating characteristic (AROC) curve was used to quantify test accuracy when the source contribution was controlled versus the condition where both sources contribute. Additionally, failure rate, fixed at 5% for NH ears, as a function of behavioral-threshold category was evaluated., Results: When data for the entire subject group were examined, reducing the reflection-source contribution to the DPOAE did not result in better test performance than the best control condition at any frequency tested. When the subjects with NH were restricted to those with confirmed fine structure, AROC analyses indicated that reducing the reflection-source contribution resulted in several small increases in the accuracy (2%-5%) with which auditory status was identified relative to the best control condition. This improvement was observed for the lowest stimulus levels (i.e., L2 = 35 or 45 dB SPL). In this subset of subjects, distortion-source DPOAEs resulted in more accurate identification of mild hearing loss for a fixed false-positive rate of 5% in NH ears at lower L2's, conditions with poor accuracy in the larger group of subjects. The impact of controlling the source contribution on the identification of moderate losses was less clear in the reduced subject group, with some conditions where the distortion-source DPOAE was more accurate than the control condition and other conditions where there was no change. There was no evidence that reflection-source AM-SFOAEs more accurately identified ears with hearing loss when compared to any of the DPOAE conditions in either the large or reduced group of subjects., Conclusion: While improvements in test accuracy were observed for some subjects and some conditions (e.g., mild hearing losses and low stimulus levels in the reduced subset of subjects), these results suggest that restricting cochlear source contribution by "smoothing" DPOAE fine structure is not expected to improve DPOAE test accuracy in a general population of subjects. Likewise, recording reflection-source OAEs using the AM-SFOAE technique would not be expected to more accurately identify hearing status compared to mixed- or single-source DPOAEs.

Objectives: Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a clinical disorder characterized by the absence of auditory brainstem response and presence of otoacoustic emissions. A gradual loss of otoacoustic emissions has been reported for some cases of AN. Such cases could be diagnosed as cochlear hearing loss and lead to misunderstanding of the pathology when patients first visit clinics after the loss of otoacoustic emissions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the time course of changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in association with patients' genetic and clinical backgrounds, including the use of hearing aids., Design: DPOAE measurements from 31 patients with AN were assessed. Genetic analyses for GJB2, OTOF, and mitochondrial m.1555A> G and m.3243A> G mutations were conducted for all cases, and the analyses for CDH23 and OPA1 were conducted for the selected cases. Patients who were younger than 10 years of age at the time of AN diagnosis were designated as the pediatric AN group (22 cases), and those who were 18 years of age or older were designated as the adult AN group (9 cases). DPOAE was measured at least twice in all patients. The response rate for DPOAEs was defined and analyzed., Results: The pediatric AN group comprised 10 patients with OTOF mutations, 1 with GJB2 mutations, 1 with OPA1 mutation, and 10 with indefinite causes. Twelve ears (27%) showed no change in DPOAE, 20 ears (46%) showed a decrease in DPOAE, and 12 ears (27%) lost DPOAE. Loss of DPOAE occurred in one ear (2%) at 0 years of age and four ears (9%) at 1 year of age. The time courses of DPOAEs in patients with OTOF mutations were divided into those with early loss and those with no change, indicating that the mechanism for deterioration of DPOAEs includes not only the OTOF mutations but also other common modifier factors. Most, but not all, AN patients who used hearing aids showed deterioration of DPOAEs after the start of using hearing aids. A few AN patients also showed deterioration of DPOAEs before using hearing aids. The adult AN group comprised 2 patients with OPA1 mutations, 2 with OTOF mutations, and 5 with indefinite causes. Four ears (22%) showed no change in DPOAE, 13 ears (72%) showed a decrease, and one ear (6%) showed a loss of DPOAE. Although the ratio of DPOAE decrease was higher in the adult AN group than in the pediatric AN group, the ratio of DPOAE loss was lower in the adult AN group. DPOAE was not lost in all four ears with OPA1 mutations and in all four ears with OTOF mutations in the adult group., Conclusions: DPOAE was decreased or lost in approximately 70% of pediatric and about 80% of adult AN patients. Eleven percent of pediatric AN patients lost DPOAEs by 1 year of age. Genetic factors were thought to have influenced the time course of DPOAEs in the pediatric AN group. In most adult AN patients, DPOAE was rarely lost regardless of the genetic cause.

Objectives: Recent animal studies suggest that noise-induced synaptopathy may underlie a phenomenon that has been labeled hidden hearing loss (HHL). Noise exposure preferentially damages low spontaneous-rate auditory nerve fibers, which are involved in the processing of moderate- to high-level sounds and are more resistant to masking by background noise. Therefore, the effect of synaptopathy may be more evident in suprathreshold measures of auditory function, especially in the presence of background noise. The purpose of this study was to develop a statistical model for estimating HHL in humans using thresholds in noise as the outcome variable and measures that reflect the integrity of sites along the auditory pathway as explanatory variables. Our working hypothesis is that HHL is evident in the portion of the variance observed in thresholds in noise that is not dependent on thresholds in quiet, because this residual variance retains statistical dependence on other measures of suprathreshold function., Design: Study participants included 13 adults with normal hearing (≤15 dB HL) and 20 adults with normal hearing at 1 kHz and sensorineural hearing loss at 4 kHz (>15 dB HL). Thresholds in noise were measured, and the residual of the correlation between thresholds in noise and thresholds in quiet, which we refer to as thresholds-in-noise residual, was used as the outcome measure for the model. Explanatory measures were as follows: (1) auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I and V amplitudes; (2) electrocochleographic action potential and summating potential amplitudes; (3) distortion product otoacoustic emissions level; and (4) categorical loudness scaling. All measurements were made at two frequencies (1 and 4 kHz). ABR and electrocochleographic measurements were made at 80 and 100 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level, while wider ranges of levels were tested during distortion product otoacoustic emission and categorical loudness scaling measurements. A model relating the thresholds-in-noise residual and the explanatory measures was created using multiple linear regression analysis., Results: Predictions of thresholds-in-noise residual using the model accounted for 61% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) of the variance in the measured thresholds-in-noise residual at 1 and 4 kHz, respectively., Conclusions: Measures of thresholds in noise, the summating potential to action potential ratio, and ABR waves I and V amplitudes may be useful for the prediction of HHL in humans. With further development, our approach of quantifying HHL by the variance that remains in suprathreshold measures of auditory function after removing the variance due to thresholds in quiet, together with our statistical modeling, may provide a quantifiable and verifiable estimate of HHL in humans with normal hearing and with hearing loss. The current results are consistent with the view that inner hair cell and auditory nerve pathology may underlie suprathreshold auditory performance.

Objectives: This study determined the effect of hearing loss and English-speaking competency on the South African English digits-in-noise hearing test to evaluate its suitability for use across native (N) and non-native (NN) speakers., Design: A prospective cross-sectional cohort study of N and NN English adults with and without sensorineural hearing loss compared pure-tone air conduction thresholds to the speech reception threshold (SRT) recorded with the smartphone digits-in-noise hearing test. A rating scale was used for NN English listeners' self-reported competence in speaking English. This study consisted of 454 adult listeners (164 male, 290 female; range 16 to 90 years), of whom 337 listeners had a best ear four-frequency pure-tone average (4FPTA; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of ≤25 dB HL., Results: A linear regression model identified three predictors of the digits-in-noise SRT, namely, 4FPTA, age, and self-reported English-speaking competence. The NN group with poor self-reported English-speaking competence (≤5/10) performed significantly (p < 0.01) poorer than the N and NN (≥6/10) groups on the digits-in-noise test. Screening characteristics of the test improved with separate cutoff values depending on English-speaking competence for the N and NN groups (≥6/10) and NN group alone (≤5/10). Logistic regression models, which include age in the analysis, showed a further improvement in sensitivity and specificity for both groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.962 and 0.903, respectively)., Conclusions: Self-reported English-speaking competence had a significant influence on the SRT obtained with the smartphone digits- in-noise test. A logistic regression approach considering SRT, self-reported English-speaking competence, and age as predictors of best ear 4FPTA >25 dB HL showed that the test can be used as an accurate hearing screening tool for N and NN English speakers. The smartphone digits-in-noise test, therefore, allows testing in a multilingual population familiar with English digits using dynamic cutoff values that can be chosen according to self-reported English-speaking competence and age.

Objective: To evaluate the speech-in-noise performance of listeners with different levels of hearing loss in a variety of complex listening environments., Design: The quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN)-based test battery was used to measure the speech recognition performance of listeners with different levels of hearing loss. Subjective estimates of speech reception thresholds (SRTs) corresponding to 100% and 0% speech intelligibility, respectively, were obtained using a method of adjustment before objective measurement of the actual SRT corresponding to 50% speech intelligibility in every listening condition., Results: Of the seven alternative listening conditions, two conditions, one involving time-compressed, reverberant speech (TC+Rev), and the other (N0Sπ) having in-phase noise masker (N0) and out-of-phase target (Sπ), were found to be substantially more sensitive to the effect of hearing loss than the standard QuickSIN test. The performance in these two conditions also correlated with self-reported difficulties in attention/concentration during speech communication and in localizing the sound source, respectively. Hearing thresholds could account for about 50% or less variance in SRTs in any listening condition. Subjectively estimated SRTs (SRTs corresponding to 0% and 100% speech intelligibility) were highly correlated with the objective SRT measurements (SRT corresponding to 50% speech intelligibility)., Conclusions: A test battery that includes the TC+Rev and the N0Sπ conditions would be useful in identifying individuals with hearing loss with speech-in-noise deficits in everyday communication.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the use of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and middle ear absorbance measurements to monitor auditory function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receiving ototoxic medications. TEOAEs were elicited with a chirp stimulus using an extended bandwidth (0.71 to 8 kHz) to measure cochlear function at higher frequencies than traditional TEOAEs. Absorbance over a wide bandwidth (0.25 to 8 kHz) provides information on middle ear function. The combination of these time-efficient measurements has the potential to identify early signs of ototoxic hearing loss., Design: A longitudinal study design was used to monitor the hearing of 91 patients with CF (median age = 25 years; age range = 15 to 63 years) who received known ototoxic medications (e.g., tobramycin) to prevent or treat bacterial lung infections. Results were compared to 37 normally hearing young adults (median age = 32.5 years; age range = 18 to 65 years) without a history of CF or similar treatments. Clinical testing included 226-Hz tympanometry, pure-tone air-conduction threshold testing from 0.25 to 16 kHz and bone conduction from 0.25 to 4 kHz. Experimental testing included wideband absorbance at ambient and tympanometric peak pressure and TEOAEs in three stimulus conditions: at ambient pressure and at tympanometric peak pressure using a chirp stimulus with constant incident pressure level across frequency and at ambient pressure using a chirp stimulus with constant absorbed sound power across frequency., Results: At the initial visit, behavioral audiometric results indicated that 76 of the 157 ears (48%) from patients with CF had normal hearing, whereas 81 of these ears (52%) had sensorineural hearing loss for at least one frequency. Seven ears from four patients had a confirmed behavioral change in hearing threshold for ≥3 visits during study participation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that all three TEOAE conditions were useful for distinguishing CF ears with normal hearing from ears with sensorineural hearing loss, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.78 to 0.92 across methods for frequency bands from 2.8 to 8 kHz. Case studies are presented to illustrate the relationship between changes in audiometric thresholds, TEOAEs, and absorbance across study visits. Absorbance measures permitted identification of potential middle ear dysfunction at 5.7 kHz in an ear that exhibited a temporary hearing loss., Conclusions: The joint use of TEOAEs and absorbance has the potential to explain fluctuations in audiometric thresholds due to changes in cochlear function, middle ear function, or both. These findings are encouraging for the joint use of TEOAE and wideband absorbance objective tests for monitoring ototoxicity, particularly, in patients who may be too ill for behavioral hearing tests. Additional longitudinal studies are needed in a larger number of CF patients receiving ototoxic drugs to further evaluate the clinical utility of these measures in an ototoxic monitoring program.

Objectives: An important clinical application of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) is to evaluate cochlear outer hair cell function for the purpose of detecting sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Double-evoked TEOAEs were measured using a chirp stimulus, in which the stimuli had an extended frequency range compared to clinical tests. The present study compared TEOAEs recorded using an unweighted stimulus presented at either ambient pressure or tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) in the ear canal and TEOAEs recorded using a power-weighted stimulus at ambient pressure. The unweighted stimulus had approximately constant incident pressure magnitude across frequency, and the power-weighted stimulus had approximately constant absorbed sound power across frequency. The objective of this study was to compare TEOAEs from 0.79 to 8 kHz using these three stimulus conditions in adults to assess test performance in classifying ears as having either normal hearing or SNHL., Design: Measurements were completed on 87 adult participants. Eligible participants had either normal hearing (N = 40; M F = 16 24; mean age = 30 years) or SNHL (N = 47; M F = 20 27; mean age = 58 years), and normal middle ear function as defined by standard clinical criteria for 226-Hz tympanometry. Clinical audiometry, immittance, and an experimental wideband test battery, which included reflectance and TEOAE tests presented for 1-min durations, were completed for each ear on all participants. All tests were then repeated 1 to 2 months later. TEOAEs were measured by presenting the stimulus in the three stimulus conditions. TEOAE data were analyzed in each hearing group in terms of the half-octave-averaged signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the coherence synchrony measure (CSM) at frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz. The test-retest reliability of these measures was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was measured at audiometric frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz to determine TEOAE test performance in distinguishing SNHL from normal hearing., Results: Mean TEOAE SNR was ≥8.7 dB for normal-hearing ears and ≤6 dB for SNHL ears for all three stimulus conditions across all frequencies. Mean test-retest reliability of TEOAE SNR was ≤4.3 dB for both hearing groups across all frequencies, although it was generally less (≤3.5 dB) for lower frequencies (1 to 4 kHz). AUCs were between 0.85 and 0.94 for all three TEOAE conditions at all frequencies, except for the ambient TEOAE condition at 2 kHz (0.82) and for all TEOAE conditions at 5.7 kHz with AUCs between 0.78 and 0.81. Power-weighted TEOAE AUCs were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than ambient TEOAE AUCs at 2 and 2.8 kHz, as was the TPP TEOAE AUC at 2.8 kHz when using CSM as the classifier variable., Conclusions: TEOAEs evaluated in an ambient condition, at TPP and in a power-weighted stimulus condition, had good test performance in identifying ears with SNHL based on SNR and CSM in the frequency range from 1 to 8 kHz and showed good test-retest reliability. Power-weighted TEOAEs showed the best test performance at 2 and 2.8 kHz. These findings are encouraging as a potential objective clinical tool to identify patients with cochlear hearing loss.

Objectives: Deterioration in hearing thresholds in children is of concern due to the effect on language development. Before universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), accurate information on the progression of hearing loss was difficult to obtain due to limited information on hearing loss onset. The objective of this population-based study was to document the proportion of children who experienced progressive loss in a cohort followed through a UNHS program in one region of Canada. We explored risk factors for progression including risk indicators, audiologic, and clinical characteristics of children. We also investigated deterioration in hearing as a function of age. For this study, two working definitions of progressive hearing loss were adopted: (1) a change of ≥20 dB in the 3 frequencies (500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) pure-tone average, and (2) a decrease of ≥10 dB at two or more adjacent frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz or a decrease in 15 dB at one octave frequency in the same frequency range., Design: Population-based data were collected prospectively on a cohort of children identified from 2003 to 2013 after the implementation of UNHS. Clinical characteristics including risk indicators (as per Joint Committee on Infant Hearing), age at diagnosis, type and severity of hearing loss, and initial audiologic information were recorded when children were first identified with hearing loss. Serial audiometric results were extracted from the medical charts for this study. Differences between children with progressive and stable hearing loss were explored using χ tests. Association between risk indicators and progressive hearing loss was assessed through logistic regression. The cumulative amount of deterioration in hearing from 1 to 4 years of age was also examined., Results: Our analysis of 330 children (251 exposed to screening) with detailed audiologic records showed that 158 (47.9%) children had some deterioration (at least ≥10 dB and) in hearing thresholds in at least one ear. The 158 children included 76 (48.1%) with ≥20 dB loss in pure-tone average in at least one ear and 82 (51.9%) with less deterioration in hearing levels (≥10 but <20 dB). In the children with progressive hearing loss, of 131 children initially diagnosed with bilateral loss, 75 (57.3%) experienced deterioration in 1 ear and 56 (112 ears; 42.7%) in both ears (total of 187 ears). Of 27 children with an initial diagnosis of unilateral loss, 25 experienced deterioration in the impaired ear and 5 in the normal-hearing ear, progressing to bilateral hearing loss. Within 4 years after diagnosis, the mean decrease in hearing for children with progressive loss was 25.9 dB (SD: 16.4) in the right ear and 28.3 dB (SD: 12.9) in the left ear. We explored the risk factors for hearing loss identified by Joint Committee on Infant Hearing where there were sufficient numbers in our sample. On multivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant relationship between most risk indicators examined (neonatal intensive care unit admission, family history, syndromes, and postnatal infections) and the likelihood of progressive loss. However, the presence of craniofacial anomalies was inversely associated with risk of progressive hearing loss (odds ratio = 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.71; p = 0.01), that is, these children were more likely to have stable hearing., Conclusions: Given that almost half of the children in this cohort experienced deterioration in hearing, close postneonatal monitoring of hearing following early hearing loss identification is essential to ensure optimal amplification and therapy.

Objectives: To validate a French-language version of the spatial hearing questionnaire (SHQ), including investigating its internal structure using cluster analysis and exploring its construct validity on a large population of hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) subjects, and to compare the SHQ with the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) in the same population., Design: The SHQ was translated in accordance with the principles of the Universalist Model of cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome instruments. The SSQ and SHQ were then presented in a counterbalanced order, in a self-report mode, in a population of 230 HI subjects (mean age = 54 years and pure-tone audiometry [PTA] on the better ear = 28 dB HL) and 100 NH subjects (mean age = 21 years). The SHQ feasibility, readability, and psychometric properties were systematically investigated using reliability indices, cluster, and factor analyses and multiregression analyses. SHQ characteristics were compared both to different literature data obtained with different language versions and to the SSQ scores obtained in the same population., Results: Internal validity was high and very good reproducibility of scores and intersubject variability were obtained across the 24 items between the English and French SHQ for NH subjects. Factor and cluster analyses concurred in identifying five correlated factors, corresponding to several SHQ subscales: (1) speech in noise (corresponding to SHQ subscales 7 and 8), (2) localization of voice sounds from behind, (3) speech in quiet (corresponding to SHQ subscale 1), (4) localization of everyday sounds, and (5) localization of voices and music (corresponding to parts of the SHQ localization subscale). Correlations between SSQ subscales and SHQ factors identified the greatest correlations between SHQ factors 2, 4, and 5 and SSQ spatial subscales, whereas SHQ factor 1 had the greatest correlation with SSQ&#95;speech. SHQ and SSQ scores were similar, whether in NH subjects (8.5 versus 8.4) or in HI subjects (6.6 for both), sharing more than 80% of variance. The SHQ localization subscale gave similar scores as the SSQ spatial subscale, sharing more than 75% of variance. Construct validity identified better ear PTA and PTA asymmetry as the two main predictors of SHQ scores, to a degree similar to that seen for the SSQ. The SHQ was shorter, easier to read and less sensitive to the number of years of formal education than the SSQ, but this came at a cost of ecological validity, which was rated higher for the SSQ than for the SHQ., Conclusions: A comparison of factor analysis outcomes among the English, Dutch, and French versions of the SHQ confirmed good conceptual equivalence across languages and robustness of the SHQ for use in international settings. In addition, SHQ and SSQ scores showed remarkable similarities, suggesting the possibility of extrapolating the results from one questionnaire to the other. Although the SHQ was originally designed in a population of cochlear implant patients, the present results show that its usefulness could easily be extended to noncochlear-implanted, HI subjects.

Objectives: Five databases were mined to examine distributions of air-bone gaps obtained by automated and manual audiometry. Differences in distribution characteristics were examined for evidence of influences unrelated to the audibility of test signals., Design: The databases provided air- and bone-conduction thresholds that permitted examination of air-bone gap distributions that were free of ceiling and floor effects. Cases with conductive hearing loss were eliminated based on air-bone gaps, tympanometry, and otoscopy, when available. The analysis is based on 2,378,921 threshold determinations from 721,831 subjects from five databases., Results: Automated audiometry produced air-bone gaps that were normally distributed suggesting that air- and bone-conduction thresholds are normally distributed. Manual audiometry produced air-bone gaps that were not normally distributed and show evidence of biasing effects of assumptions of expected results. In one database, the form of the distributions showed evidence of inclusion of conductive hearing losses., Conclusions: Thresholds obtained by manual audiometry show tester bias effects from assumptions of the patient's hearing loss characteristics. Tester bias artificially reduces the variance of bone-conduction thresholds and the resulting air-bone gaps. Because the automated method is free of bias from assumptions of expected results, these distributions are hypothesized to reflect the true variability of air- and bone-conduction thresholds and the resulting air-bone gaps.

Objectives: The present study evaluated a novel test paradigm based on speech-evoked envelope following responses (EFRs) as an objective aided outcome measure for individuals fitted with hearing aids. Although intended for use in infants with hearing loss, this study evaluated the paradigm in adults with hearing loss, as a precursor to further evaluation in infants. The test stimulus was a naturally male-spoken token /susa∫i/, modified to enable recording of eight individual EFRs, two from each vowel for different formants and one from each fricative. In experiment I, sensitivity of the paradigm to changes in audibility due to varying stimulus level and use of hearing aids was tested. In experiment II, sensitivity of the paradigm to changes in aided audible bandwidth was evaluated. As well, experiment II aimed to test convergent validity of the EFR paradigm by comparing the effect of bandwidth on EFRs and behavioral outcome measures of hearing aid fitting., Design: Twenty-one adult hearing aid users with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. To evaluate the effects of level and amplification in experiment I, the stimulus was presented at 50 and 65 dB SPL through an ER-2 insert earphone in unaided conditions and through individually verified hearing aids in aided conditions. Behavioral thresholds of EFR carriers were obtained using an ER-2 insert earphone to estimate sensation level of EFR carriers. To evaluate the effect of aided audible bandwidth in experiment II, EFRs were elicited by /susa∫i/ low-pass filtered at 1, 2, and 4 kHz and presented through the programmed hearing aid. EFRs recorded in the 65 dB SPL aided condition in experiment I represented the full bandwidth condition. EEG was recorded from the vertex to the nape of the neck over 300 sweeps. Speech discrimination using the University of Western Ontario Distinctive Feature Differences test and sound quality rating using the Multiple-Stimulus Hidden Reference and Anchor paradigm were measured in the same bandwidth conditions., Results: In experiment I, an increase in stimulus level above threshold and the use of amplification resulted in a significant increase in the number of EFRs detected per condition. At positive sensation levels, an increase in level demonstrated a significant increase in response amplitude in unaided and aided conditions. At 50 and 65 dB SPL, the use of amplification led to a significant increase in response amplitude for the majority of carriers. In experiment II, the number of EFR detections and the combined response amplitude of all eight EFRs improved with an increase in bandwidth up to 4 kHz. In contrast, behavioral measures continued to improve at wider bandwidths. Further change in EFR parameters was possibly limited by the hearing aid bandwidth. Significant positive correlations were found between EFR parameters and behavioral test scores in experiment II., Conclusions: The EFR paradigm demonstrates sensitivity to changes in audibility due to a change in stimulus level, bandwidth, and use of amplification in clinically feasible test times. The paradigm may thus have potential applications as an objective aided outcome measure. Further investigations exploring stimulus-response relationships in aided conditions and validation studies in children are warranted.

Objective: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) have long been heralded as a means to objectively monitor cochlear function and increasingly are becoming a key component in hearing surveillance programs for individuals at risk for ototoxic- and occupational noise-related hearing loss. Yet clinicians are unsure how to define clinically meaningful shifts in DPOAE level. In this study, a meta-analysis approach is used to synthesize the DPOAE level test-retest literature to construct a set of DPOAE level shift reference limits that can be used clinically to define a statistically significant emission change., Design: The authors reviewed all published articles identified through a Medline search using the terms "Otoacoustic Emission Variability," "Otoacoustic Emission Reliability," "Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability," and "Otoacoustic Emission Test Retest" restricted to DPOAEs, adults, and English language. Articles with DPOAE level data elicited by moderate stimulus levels for f2 frequencies of 1000, 2000, 4000, or 6000 Hz were selected because these stimulus parameters were relatively well represented in the literature. The authors only included articles that reported the standard error of the measurement (SEM) or from which the SEM could be calculated. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the population mean SEM over the included studies. Models were fit separately for each f2 primary and included days since baseline and study-specific random effects., Results: Ten DPOAE test-retest studies met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. The SEM values varied widely across published studies (0.57 to 3.9 dB) and were provided for relatively short time intervals (less than 15 days on average). Time, or days since baseline, was statistically significant at higher f2 frequencies (4000 and 6000 Hz). From the model results, 90% reference limits specific to the f2 and elapsed time between baseline and follow-up measurements were established. Reference limits provided correspond to negative (emission decrement) and positive (emission enhancement) shifts indicative of the amount of measurement variability that, using this approach, must be tolerated as "normal" fluctuations over time. Changes larger than the reference limits are considered significant and warrant follow-up testing., Conclusions: The meta-analysis presented provides reference limits that are appropriate for a set of specific f2 frequencies and time intervals. The meta-analysis concerns the SEM statistic directly, so that any preferred reference limit can be computed from the results and should be predicated upon the screening application. The presumed advantage of this meta-analytic approach is increased precision relative to limits suggested by any of the individual studies included in the analysis.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test performance of wideband absorbance (WBA) in terms of its ability to predict the outer and middle ear status as determined by nine reference standards., Design: Automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), high-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry (HFT), transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) tests were performed on 298 ears (144 right, 154 left) of 192 (108 males, 84 females) neonates with a mean age of 43.7 hours (SD = 21.3, range = 8.3 to 152.2 hr). WBA was measured from 0.25 to 8 kHz using clicks under ambient pressure conditions. Test performance of WBA was assessed in terms of its ability to identify conductive conditions in neonates when compared with nine reference standards (including four single tests and five test batteries) using the receiver operating characteristic analysis., Results: The test performance of WBA against the test battery reference standards was better than that against single test reference standards. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve reached a high value of 0.78 for HFT + TEOAE + DPOAE and AABR + TEOAE + DPOAE reference standards. Within the ears that passed each of the reference standards, there were no significant differences in WBA. However, for the ears that failed each of the test standards, there were significant differences in WBA. The region between 1 and 4 kHz provided the best discriminability to evaluate the conductive status compared with other frequencies., Conclusions: WBA is a desirable measure of conductive conditions in newborns due to its high performance in classifying ears with conductive loss as determined by the best performing surrogate gold standards (HFT + TEOAE + DPOAE and AABR + TEOAE + DPOAE).

Objectives: Diagnosis of hearing loss and prescription of amplification for infants and young children require accurate estimates of ear- and frequency-specific behavioral thresholds based on auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements. Although the overall relationship between ABR and behavioral thresholds has been demonstrated, the agreement is imperfect, and the accuracy of predictions of behavioral threshold based on ABR may depend on degree of hearing loss. Behavioral thresholds are lower than ABR thresholds, at least in part due to differences in calibration interacting with the effects of temporal integration, which are manifest in behavioral measurements but not ABR measurements and depend on behavioral threshold. Listeners with sensory hearing loss exhibit reduced or absent temporal integration, which could impact the relationship between ABR and behavioral thresholds as degree of hearing loss increases. The present study evaluated the relationship between ABR and behavioral thresholds in infants and children over a range of hearing thresholds, and tested an approach for adjusting the correction factor based on degree of hearing loss as estimated by ABR measurements., Design: A retrospective review of clinical records was completed for 309 ears of 177 children with hearing thresholds ranging from normal to profound hearing loss and for whom both ABR and behavioral thresholds were available. Children were required to have the same middle ear status at both evaluations. The relationship between ABR and behavioral thresholds was examined. Factors that potentially could affect the relationship between ABR and behavioral thresholds were analyzed, including degree of hearing loss observed on the ABR, behavioral test method (visual reinforcement, conditioned play, or conventional audiometry), the length of time between ABR and behavioral assessments, and clinician-reported reliability of the behavioral assessment. Predictive accuracy of a correction factor based on the difference between ABR and behavioral thresholds as a function of ABR threshold was compared to the predictive accuracy achieved by two other correction approaches in current clinical use., Results: As expected, ABR threshold was a significant predictor of behavioral threshold. The agreement between ABR and behavioral thresholds varied as a function of degree of hearing loss. The test method, length of time between assessments, and reported reliability of the behavioral test results were not related to the differences between ABR and behavioral thresholds. A correction factor based on the linear relationship between the differences in ABR and behavioral thresholds as a function of ABR threshold resulted in more accurately predicted behavioral thresholds than other correction factors in clinical use., Conclusions: ABR is a valid predictor of behavioral threshold in infants and children. A correction factor that accounts for the effect of degree of hearing loss on the differences between ABR and behavioral thresholds resulted in more accurate predictions of behavioral thresholds than methods that used a constant correction factor regardless of degree of hearing loss. These results are consistent with predictions based on previous research on temporal integration for listeners with hearing loss.

Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that word recognition in a complex, two-talker masker is more closely related to real-world speech perception for children with hearing loss than testing performed in quiet or steady-state noise., Design: Sixteen school-age hearing aid users were tested on aided word recognition in noise or two-talker speech. Unaided estimates of speech perception in quiet were retrospectively obtained from the clinical record. Ten parents completed a questionnaire regarding their children's ease of communication and understanding in background noise., Results: Unaided performance in quiet was correlated with aided performance in competing noise, but not in two-talker speech. Only results in the two-talker masker were correlated with parental reports of their children's functional hearing abilities., Conclusions: Speech perception testing in a complex background such as two-talker speech may provide a more accurate predictor of the communication challenges of children with hearing loss than testing in steady noise or quiet.

Objective: Cochlear reflectance (CR) is the cochlear contribution to ear-canal reflectance. CR is equivalent to an otoacoustic emission (OAE) deconvolved by forward pressure in the ear canal. Similar to other OAE measures, CR level is related to cochlear status. When measured using wideband noise stimuli, potential advantages of CR over other types of OAEs include (1) the capability to cover a wider frequency range more efficiently by requiring fewer measurements, (2) minimal influence on the recorded emission from the measurement system and middle ear, (3) lack of entrainment of spontaneous OAEs, and (4) easier interpretation because of the existence of an equivalent linear model, which validates the application of linear systems theory. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the reliability, assess the accuracy in a clinical screening paradigm, and determine the relation of CR to audiometric thresholds. Thus, this study represents an initial assessment of the clinical utility of CR., Design: Data were collected from 32 normal-hearing and 58 hearing-impaired participants. A wideband noise stimulus presented at seven stimulus levels (10 to 70 dB SPL, 10 dB steps) was used to elicit the CR. Reliability of CR was assessed using Cronbach's α, standard error of measurement, and absolute differences between CR data from three separate test sessions. Test performance was evaluated using clinical decision theory. The ability of CR to predict audiometric thresholds was evaluated using regression analysis., Results: CR repeatability across test sessions was similar to that of other clinical measurements. However, both the accuracy with which CR distinguished normal-hearing from hearing-impaired ears and the accuracy with which CR predicted audiometric thresholds were less than those reported in previous studies using distortion-product OAE measurements., Conclusions: CR measurements are repeatable between test sessions, can be used to predict auditory status, and are related to audiometric thresholds. However, under current conditions, CR does not perform as well as other OAE measurements. Further developments in CR measurement and analysis methods may improve performance. CR has theoretical advantages for cochlear modeling, which may lead to improved interpretation of cochlear status.

Objectives: This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold., Design: Subjects were recruited if they had an ABR threshold of ≥ 40 dB nHL and ≤ 70 dB nHL in one or both ears measured below the age of 6 months and they had also attended follow-up appointments for behavioral assessment of their hearing in which the type of hearing loss had been confirmed. Forty-five children (84 ears) with SNHL, 82 children (141 ears) with temporary conductive hearing loss (TCHL), and 5 children (10 ears) with permanent conductive hearing loss (PCHL) were recruited. The differences between mean wave V latencies measured 20 dB above ABR threshold were examined using the independent t-test for the groups of cases with SNHL, TCHL, and PCHL. Signal-detection theory was used to examine the relationship between sensitivity and specificity when the latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was used to identify the presence of SNHL. Receiver operating characteristics were generated and the coordinates of the curve examined for the best compromise between sensitivity and false-alarm rate. The specificity, positive predictive value, and probability of missing a true case were determined for the most promising criteria., Results: There were significant differences between the two groups with SNHL and TCHL. The mean latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was 1 msec shorter in those with SNHL compared with those with TCHL. There were significant differences between children with PCHL and SNHL but no difference between those with PCHL and TCHL. When a criterion of < 7.6 msec was chosen to predict the presence of SNHL the test sensitivity was 0.98, test specificity 0.71, and positive predictive value was 0.66. Nine out of 10 of those with a latency 20 dB above threshold of < 7.0 msec had an SNHL., Conclusions: The latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold measured using click ABR is a useful indicator of the type of hearing loss in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.

Objectives: Assessment of auditory and vestibular function in Wolfram Syndrome (WS) patients, using a standardized protocol., Design: Prospective cohort study of 11 patients using otoscopic inspection, tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions, pure tones, speech in noise (SIN), the Speech Intelligibility Index, and rotational chair testing., Results: Mean SNHL diagnosis was 7.3 years with 55% prevalence. Four patients with a Speech Intelligibility Index less than 0.75 (better ear) routinely used bilateral amplification devices. Two patients with normal-hearing sensitivity exhibited abnormal SIN scores. The only patient with significant vestibular dysfunction also had a distinctive low-frequency component to her SNHL., Conclusions: Hearing loss may occur earlier than previously suspected, and comprehensive testing including SIN testing may reveal deficits not apparent with pure-tone testing. Particular configurations of hearing loss may indicate a need for comprehensive vestibular assessment. Because SNHL can be the first symptom of WS, audiologists and otolaryngologists should be vigilant about referring patients with hearing loss for ophthalmologic examination.

Objectives: Even though it is currently not possible to prove a pathological diagnosis for inner ear disease, acute low-frequency hearing loss (ALFHL) without vertigo could be caused by inner ear hydrops because progression into the clinical spectrum of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) frequently occur among patients with the initial clinical presentation. Therefore, audiological measures representative of inner ear hydrops, such as the cochlear hydrops analysis masking procedure (CHAMP) test, may be used to predict the prognosis of ALFHL without vertigo. To test this hypothesis, we prospectively investigated patients with ALFHL unaccompanied by vertigo and examined whether the CHAMP test generated more useful information for prediction of progression into clinical spectrum of EH compared with other neurotologic parameters., Design: A prospective clinical study of 28 patients who initially presented with ALFHL without vertigo was conducted. Detailed neurotologic findings from pure-tone audiometry, electrocochleography, CHAMP, spontaneous nystagmus, head-shaking nystagmus, vibration-induced nystagmus, the bithermal caloric test, and the rotatory chair test were recorded at the time of initial presentation. A regular audiological and clinical examination was conducted until either the last follow-up at our clinic or on the day on which secondary audiovestibular symptoms occurred. The rates of progression to Ménière's disease (MD) or clinical presentation compatible with isolated cochlear hydrops during the study period were calculated by the log-rank test and relative risk. A receiver operating characteristics curve was plotted to determine the prognostic value of CHAMP., Results: Of 28 patients, 15 (53%) showed improvement in hearing on pure-tone audiometry. Seven patients (25%) showed hearing fluctuation and nine (32%) developed a vertigo attack during the observation period. Of these, three patients experienced both vertigo and a hearing fluctuation. Abnormal results of electrocochleography and neurotologic tests reflecting vestibular ocular reflex on yaw plane were common at the time of diagnosis of ALFHL in many patients, but these parameters were not associated with an increased risk of progression of clinical spectrum of EH. In contrast, patients with an abnormal complex amplitude ratio (CAR) on CHAMP had a 2.6-fold increased risk of progression to a clinical spectrum of EH (either hearing fluctuation or MD). The hazard ratio of developing MD for patients with normal CAR as compared with those with an abnormal CAR was 0.137 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.57; p < 0.001), which indicates an 84.3% reduced risk of developing MD in those with normal CAR. A CAR value of 0.975 or less indicated the possibility of developing either a hearing fluctuation or vertiginous episode with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 73% by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis., Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that CHAMP measurement may be useful for determining the prognosis of patients with ALFHL without vertigo. A CAR value of 0.975 or less indicates the possibility of developing fluctuating hearing loss or vertigo in patients with ALFHL unaccompanied by vertigo.

Objectives: The objective was to develop and evaluate a new sentence test, the Sentence Test with Adaptive Randomized Roving levels, intended to emulate everyday listening experience, using both normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) groups, examining practicality, learning, test-retest variability, and interlist variability., Design: In experiment 1, each of 25 NH adults was tested using five lists, each comprising 30 sentences. One male and one female speaker each spoke 15 sentences. Ten sentences were presented at each of three presentation levels: 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL. The relative level of a speech-shaped noise was varied adaptively to estimate the speech reception threshold (SRT). Counterbalance for list order was achieved by staggering the allocation of lists to participants. To allow assessment of learning effects, no practice was given. The variability of mean SRTs across lists was small, but correction factors were derived for each list so that, after correction, all lists gave the same mean SRT. Test-retest variability was estimated by examining the corrected SRTs for each subject's five lists. In experiment 2, 25 CI users each received one test list after a small amount of practice. Experiment 3 examined the effect of speech rate using time-compressed speech, for age-matched NH and CI users., Results: The mean SRT for the NH participants was approximately -6 dB and was similar for the male and female speakers. There was a small but significant improvement in SRTs between the first and later lists administered, but no further improvement for subsequent lists. On the basis of the variability of the corrected SRTs within each participant, a 2.2 dB difference in SRT is meaningful for comparisons using one test list per condition, for a single participant. The percentage of key words correct varied with presentation level over a 13% range, being best at 65 dB SPL. Only 40% of the CI group achieved an SRT lower than 20 dB for both speakers. There was large individual variability in the SRTs, and SRTs were higher for the female than for the male speaker. For the CI participants, the percentage of key words correct varied markedly with level, from 19% at the lowest level to 57% at the medium level. Time compression had a small effect for NH participants but a very large effect for CI participants., Conclusions: The Sentence Test with Adaptive Randomized Roving levels seems practical to administer and is reasonably sensitive. For NH participants, a 2.2 dB difference in SRT is meaningful for a single list per condition and a single participant. Although learning effects were small for NH participants, it seems prudent to provide some practice sentences when testing hearing-impaired or CI participants. The very large effect of time compression for the CI group has implications for live voice testing of children, because speech rate is only poorly controlled in such testing.

Objectives: Presently available nonbehavioral methods to estimate auditory thresholds perform less well at frequencies below 1 kHz than at 1 kHz and above. For many uses, such as providing accurate infant hearing aid amplification for low-frequency vowels, an accurate nonbehavioral method to estimate low-frequency thresholds is needed. A novel technique was developed to estimate low-frequency cochlear thresholds based on the use of a previously reported waveform. It was determined how well the method worked by comparing the resulting thresholds to thresholds from onset-response compound action potentials (CAPs) and single-auditory-nerve (AN)- fibers in cats. A long-term goal is to translate this technique for use in humans., Design: An electrode near the cochlea records a combination of cochlear microphonic (CM) and neural responses. In response to low-frequency, near threshold-level tones, the CM is almost sinusoidal whereas the neural responses occur preferentially at one phase of the tone. If the tone is presented again but with its polarity reversed, the neural response keeps the same shape, but shifts ½ cycle in time. Averaging responses to tones presented separately at opposite polarities overlaps and interleaves the neural responses and yields a waveform in which the CM is canceled and the neural response appears twice each tone cycle, that is, the resulting neural response is mostly at twice the tone frequency. The resultant waveform is referred to as "the auditory nerve overlapped waveform" (ANOW). In this study, ANOW level functions were measured in anesthetized cats from 10 to 80 dB SPL in 10 dB steps using tones between 0.3 and 1 kHz. As a response metric, the magnitude of the ANOW component was calculated at twice the tone frequency (ANOW2f). The ANOW threshold was the sound level where the interpolated ANOW2f crossed a statistical criterion that was higher than 95% of the noise floor distribution. ANOW thresholds were compared with onset-CAP thresholds from the same recordings and single-AN-fiber thresholds from the same animals., Results: ANOW and onset-CAP level functions were obtained for 0.3 to 1 kHz tones, and single-AN-fiber responses from cats. Except at 1 kHz, typical ANOW thresholds were mostly 10 to 20 dB more sensitive than onset-CAP thresholds and 10 to 20 dB less sensitive than the most sensitive single-AN-fiber thresholds., Conclusions: ANOW provides frequency-specific estimates of cochlear neural thresholds over a frequency range that is important for hearing but is not well accessed by nonbehavioral, objective methods. Results suggest that with further targeted development, the ANOW low-frequency threshold estimation technique can be useful both clinically in humans and in basic-science animal experiments.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) in identifying the residual hearing of subjects with partial deafness (PD)--a condition in which subjects have normal thresholds at low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss at high frequencies., Design: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were measured in 23 subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, 46 with PD, and 15 with normal hearing (NH). The PD subjects were divided into three subgroups according to the frequency at which hearing loss started: PD250 (NH up to 250 Hz)--20 ears; PD500 (NH to 500 Hz)--18 ears; and PD1000 (NH up to 1000 Hz)--20 ears. Standard-click stimuli, and 0.5- and 1-kHz tone bursts (average amplitude 80 ± 3 peak dB SPL, nonlinear averaging protocol), were used. The tone bursts were four cycles long with equal rise/fall times and no plateau. Recordings were performed in two acquisition windows: a standard one 20-msec wide for clicks and 1-kHz tone bursts, and one 30-msec wide for 0.5-kHz tone bursts. OAE response levels, signal-to-noise ratios, and reproducibility were examined in terms of wide-band responses and in terms of half-octave bands centered at 0.5 and 1 kHz. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine which type of stimuli best differentiates partially deaf subjects from subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss through the range 125 to 8000 Hz., Results: Nearly all recordings from groups PD500 and PD1000 showed 0.5-kHz TBOAEs. By contrast, 1-kHz TBOAEs and CEOAEs were generally found only in the PD1000 group. It was also possible to detect 0.5-kHz TBOAE responses in approximately 50% of ears from the PD250 group. Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that click and 1-kHz tone bursts provide a good diagnostic measure of residual hearing even when hearing loss starts as low as 1 kHz; moreover, the 0.5-kHz TBOAE could identify residual hearing when hearing loss started just > 0.5 kHz, a situation in which clicks failed to elicit a response. In the case of partially deaf subjects, diagnosis was more accurate when OAEs were analyzed by 1/2 octave bands. Furthermore, the use of a 0.5-kHz tone burst gave responses in the highest number of subjects, even when there were hearing losses in neighboring bands., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a 0.5-kHz TBOAE is a more powerful test than the standard CEOAE when cochlear function at low frequencies is of interest. The 0.5-kHz TBOAE may be used to identify partial deafness in patients who generally fail to show a response to the commonly used clicks. In addition, use of 1/2 octave-band filtering can increase the reproducibility and power of the test.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a version of the threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test for the diagnosis of dead regions for use with Etymotic ER-3A insert earphones. The use of such earphones is helpful when testing clients with asymmetric hearing loss or clients whose ear canals tend to collapse under the pressure of supra-aural headphones. It can also be useful when ambient noise levels are problematic., Design: The spectral shape of the noise required to give equal masked thresholds at all frequencies, when expressed in dB HL, was derived by empirical measurements of the electrical output of audiometers using ER-3A earphones. To reduce the loudness of the noise and to minimize distortion generated in the audiometer or earphone, the noise was band-limited between 354 and 6500 Hz. In addition, the noise was synthesized using a method that leads to a low crest factor (ratio of peak to root mean square value). This further reduced audiometer/earphone distortion, and allowed higher levels per ERBN; ERBN is the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the auditory filter at 1 kHz, as determined using young normally hearing subjects. The test tone frequencies were limited to the range 500 to 4000 Hz. Subjects with normal or near-normal hearing were tested using a noise level of 60 dB HL/ERBN, to assess whether the noise did lead to equal masked thresholds in dB HL for all audiometric frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz. Thresholds in the TEN were measured using manual audiometry with a 2 dB final step size., Results: The mean-masked thresholds varied by 1.3 dB across frequency when expressed in dB HL, and were close to the noise level per ERBN., Conclusion: This version of the TEN test can be used with ER-3A insert earphones.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the type of speech material on the benefit obtained from temporal fine structure (TFS) information in speech for young normal-hearing (YNH) and older hearing-impaired (OHI) participants., Design: The design was based on the work of . They measured the speech reception thresholds for a target talker in a background talker as a function of the frequency range over which TFS information was available. The signal was split into 32 channels, each with a bandwidth equal to the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the "normal" auditory filter at the same center frequency. Above a cutoff (CO) channel, channels were vocoded and contained only temporal envelope information. Channels up to and including CO were not processed. Hopkins et al. found that, as CO was increased, speech reception thresholds decreased more for normal-hearing participants than for participants with cochlear hearing loss, suggesting that the latter were less able to use TFS information. We used the same design, but compared results when the target speech materials were open-set sentences, as used by Hopkins et al., and when they were more predictable sentences with a closed word set (Danish Dantale 2)., Results: With the open-set material, YNH listeners benefited more from TFS information than OHI listeners, replicating . For the YNH participants, the benefit of adding TFS was greater for the open-set material than for the closed-set material, while no difference in TFS benefit across speech materials was found for the OHI participants., Conclusions: The choice of speech material is important when assessing the benefit of TFS. Several factors may facilitate recognition in the absence of TFS cues, including small set size, predictable temporal structure of the target speech, and contextual effects. We speculate that TFS information is useful for reducing informational masking, by providing cues for the perceptual segregation of the target and background. When the target speech is highly predictable, informational masking may be minimal, rendering TFS cues unnecessary.

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the sensitivity to intermodal asynchrony in audiovisual speech with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Based on previous studies, two opposing expectations were an increase in sensitivity, as hearing-impaired listeners heavily rely on lipreading in daily life, and a reduction in sensitivity, as hearing-impaired listeners tend to be elderly and advanced age could potentially impair audiovisual integration., Design: Adults with normal (N = 11, ages between 23 and 50 yrs) and impaired hearing (N = 11, ages between 54 and 81 yrs, the pure-tone average between 42 and 67 dB HL) participated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the synchrony judgments were recorded for varying intermodal time differences in audiovisual sentence recordings. In the second experiment, the intelligibility of audiovisual and audio-only speech was measured in speech-shaped noise, and correlations were explored between the synchrony window and intelligibility scores for individual listeners., Results: Similar to previous studies, a sensitivity window on the order of a few hundred milliseconds was observed with all listeners. The average window shapes did not differ between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups; however, there was large individual variability. Individual windows were quantified by Gaussian curve fitting. Point of subjective simultaneity, a measure of window peak shift from the actual synchrony point, and full-width at half-maximum, a measure of window duration, were not correlated with participant's age or the degree of hearing loss. Points of subjective simultaneity were also not correlated with speech intelligibility scores. A moderate negative correlation that was significant at most conditions was observed between the full-width at half-maximum values and intelligibility scores., Conclusions: Contrary to either expectation per se, there was no indication of an effect of hearing impairment or age on the sensitivity to intermodal asynchrony in audiovisual speech. It is possible that the negative effects of aging were balanced with the positive effects of increased sensitivity due to reliance on visual cues with hearing impairment. The listeners, normal hearing or hearing impaired, who were more sensitive to asynchrony (with narrower synchrony windows) tended to understand speech in noise better, with both audio-only and audiovisual speech. The practical implication of the results is that delays in audio or video signals of communication systems would affect hearing-impaired listeners in a manner similar to normal-hearing listeners, and due to the importance of visual cues for the hearing-impaired listeners, special attention should be given to limit these delays.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the use of, and benefit from, information in amplified high- and low-frequency speech presented in background noise., Design: Sixty-two adults with a wide range of high- and low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (5 to 115+ dB HL) participated in the study. To examine the contribution of speech information in different frequency regions, speech understanding in noise was assessed in multiple low- and high-pass filter conditions, as well as a band-pass (713 to 3534 Hz) and wideband (143 to 8976 Hz) condition. To increase audibility over a wide frequency range, speech and noise were amplified based on each individual's hearing loss. A stepwise multiple linear regression approach was used to examine the contribution of several factors to (1) absolute performance in each filter condition and (2) the change in performance with the addition of amplified high- and low-frequency speech components., Results: Results from the regression analysis showed that degree of hearing loss was the strongest predictor of absolute performance for low- and high-pass filtered speech materials. In addition, configuration of hearing loss affected both absolute performance for severely low-pass filtered speech and benefit from extending high-frequency (3534 to 8976 Hz) bandwidth. Specifically, individuals with steeply sloping high-frequency losses made better use of low-pass filtered speech information than individuals with similar low-frequency thresholds but less high-frequency loss. In contrast, given similar high-frequency thresholds, individuals with flat hearing losses received more benefit from extending high-frequency bandwidth than individuals with more sloping losses., Conclusions: Consistent with previous work, benefit from speech information in a given frequency region generally decreases as degree of hearing loss in that frequency region increases. However, given a similar degree of loss, the configuration of hearing loss also affects the ability to use speech information in different frequency regions. Except for individuals with steeply sloping high-frequency losses, providing high-frequency amplification (3534 to 8976 Hz) had either a beneficial effect on, or did not significantly degrade, speech understanding. These findings highlight the importance of extended high-frequency amplification for listeners with a wide range of high-frequency hearing losses, when seeking to maximize intelligibility.

Objective: Auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) to multiple air conduction (AC) stimuli modulated at ∼80 Hz have been shown to provide reasonable estimates of the behavioral audiogram. To distinguish the type of hearing loss (i.e., conductive, sensorineural, or mixed), bone conduction (BC) results are necessary. There are few BC-ASSR data, especially for individuals with hearing loss. The present studies aimed to (1) determine multiple ASSR thresholds to BC stimuli in adults with normal hearing, masker-simulated hearing loss, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and (2) determine how well BC-ASSR distinguishes normal versus elevated thresholds to BC stimuli in adults with normal hearing or SNHL., Design: Multiple ASSR and behavioral thresholds for BC stimuli were determined in two studies. Study A assessed 16 normal-hearing adults with relatively flat threshold elevations produced by 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL AC masking noise, as well as no masking. Study B assessed 10 adults with normal hearing and 40 adults with SNHL. In both studies, the multiple (500 to 4000 Hz) ASSR stimuli were modulated between 77 and 101 Hz and varied in intensity from 0 to 50 dB HL in 10-dB steps. Stimuli were presented using a B71 bone oscillator held on the temporal bone by an elastic band while participants relaxed or slept., Results: Study A: Correlations (r) between behavioral and ASSR thresholds for all conditions combined were 0.77, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.87 for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. ASSR minus behavioral threshold difference scores for all frequencies combined for the no-masker, 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL masker conditions were 14.3 ± 9.2, 12.1 ± 10.4, 12.7 ± 7.7, and 11.4 ± 8.1 dB, respectively. Study B: The difference scores for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were, on average, 15.7 ± 12.3, 10.3 ± 10.7, 9.7 ± 10.3, and 5.7 ± 7.9 dB, respectively, with correlations of 0.73, 0.84, 0.87, and 0.94 for the normal-hearing and SNHL groups combined. The ASSR minus behavioral difference scores were significantly larger for 500 Hz and significantly smaller for 4000 Hz compared with 1000 and 2000 Hz. Across all frequencies, the BC-ASSR correctly classified 89% of thresholds as "normal" or "elevated" (92% correct for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz)., Conclusions: The threshold difference scores and correlations in individuals with SNHL are similar to those in normal listeners with simulated SNHL. These difference scores are also similar to those shown by previous studies for the AC-ASSR in individuals with SNHL, at least for 1000 to 4000 Hz. The BC-ASSR provides a reasonably good estimate of BC behavioral threshold in adults, especially between 1000 and 4000 Hz. Further research is required in infants with hearing loss.

Objective: Hearing loss is a common and disabling sensory disorder, yet prospective data on potentially modifiable risk factors are limited. Previous studies suggest that alcohol consumption may influence the development of hearing loss, yet results have been inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the relation between alcohol use and hearing loss in men., Design: We examined prospectively the independent association between alcohol intake and self-reported professionally diagnosed hearing loss in 26,809 men aged 40 to 74 yrs at baseline in 1986. Study participants completed detailed questionnaires at baseline and every 2 yrs thereafter. Incident cases of hearing loss were defined as those professionally diagnosed after 1986. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression was used to adjust for potential confounding factors., Results: During 386,081 person-years of follow-up, 3447 incident cases of hearing loss were reported. Overall, there was no association between level of alcohol intake and risk of hearing loss. Compared with those who did not consume alcohol, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.00 (0.89 to 1.12) for those who consumed 5.0 to 9.9 g/day, 1.08 (0.96 to 1.21) for 10.0 to 14.9 g/day, and 0.98 (0.85 to 1.13) for 30.0 to 49.9 g/day. The results did not differ by age group or folate intake. Among those with lower intake of vitamin B12, however, higher consumption of alcohol, specifically liquor, was associated with an increased risk of hearing loss., Conclusions: Our data suggest that low or moderate alcohol consumption does not influence the risk of hearing loss in older men. A possible relation between vitamin B12 intake, alcohol consumption, and hearing loss merits further investigation.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of spectral fine structure and spectral envelope cues to recognition of Mandarin lexical tones in normal-hearing and sensorineural hearing-impaired Mandarin-speaking listeners., Design: Four groups of subjects participated in the study, including 20 normal-hearing, 20 moderately, 20 moderately to severely, and 8 severely hearing-impaired listeners. The original speech materials consisted of 16 sets of Mandarin monosyllables spoken by a male and a female. Each monosyllable had four tonal patterns, resulting in a total of 64 combinations of consonants, vowels, and tones. A Linear Predictive Coding (LPC) algorithm was used to create two sets of synthesized materials, including 128 tokens with the original spectral fine structure mixed with the spectral envelope from a different tone, as well as 128 tokens with noise fine structure and the original spectral envelope. All subjects participated in tone recognition tests using the two sets of chimeric tone tokens. Oral responses to tones were recorded and scored as percent correct., Results: Hearing-impaired listeners could take advantage of spectral fine structure in the recognition of lexical tones, but with increasing hearing loss, the ability of hearing-impaired listeners to recognize tones became worse, especially for severely hearing-impaired listeners. Hearing-impaired listeners showed significant differences in tone recognition between the male and female voices. Tone 3 was the easiest tone to perceive, followed by tone 2, whereas tones 1 and 4 were hard for all subjects, particularly when only the spectral envelope cue was available. Hearing-impaired listeners showed a significantly lower level of lexical tone recognition than normal-hearing listeners when using spectral envelope cues in comparison with normal-hearing listeners., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the spectral fine structure cue dominates lexical tone recognition for all subjects. Listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment showed reduced ability in the recognition of lexical tones using both spectral fine structure and spectral envelope cues, which may result from their impaired auditory spectral resolution.

Introduction: A nonbehavioral method for monitoring ototoxicity in patients treated with cisplatin is needed because patients enduring chemotherapy may not be well or cooperative enough to undergo repeated hearing tests. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) provide a nonbehavioral measure of auditory function that is sensitive to cisplatin exposure. However, interpreting DPOAE findings in the context of ototoxicity monitoring requires that their accuracy be determined in relation to a clinically accepted gold standard test., Objectives: Among patients receiving cisplatin for the treatment of cancer, we sought to (1) identify the combination of DPOAE metrics and ototoxicity risk factors that best classified ears with and without ototoxic-induced hearing changes; and (2) evaluate the test performance achieved by the composite measure as well as by DPOAEs alone., Design: Odds of experiencing hearing changes at a given patient visit were determined using data collected prospectively from 24 Veterans receiving cisplatin. Pure-tone thresholds were examined within an octave of each subject's high-frequency hearing limit. DPOAE were collected as a set of four response growth (input/output) functions near the highest f2 frequency that yielded a robust response at L2 = L1 = 65 dB SPL. Logistic regression modeled the risk of hearing change using several DPOAE metrics, drug treatment factors, and other patient factors as independent variables. An optimal discriminant function was derived by reducing the model so that only statistically significant variables were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to evaluate test performance., Results: At higher cisplatin doses, ears with better hearing at baseline were more likely to exhibit ototoxic hearing changes than those with poorer hearing. Measures of pre-exposure hearing, cumulative drug dose, and DPOAEs generated a highly accurate discriminant function with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9. DPOAEs alone also provided an indication of ototoxic hearing change when measured at the highest DPOAE test frequency that yielded a robust response., Conclusions: DPOAEs alone and especially in combination with pre-exposure hearing and cisplatin dose provide an indication of whether or not hearing has changed as a result of cisplatin administration. These promising results need to be validated in a separate sample.