Search

Aim: Atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease is frequently seen with critical leg ischemia. Despite the benefits of pharmacological agents in the lesions, the most effective treatment method is revascularization. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of drug-eluting balloon and standard balloon endovascular treatment methods. Material and Methods: One hundred and ninety-six patients who underwent infrapopliteal revascularization in Cardiovascular Surgery clinic in Namık Kemal University Hospital between January 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. During the study, 100 patients were treated with drug-eluting balloon (DEB) (Lutonix, Bard, USA), while 96 patients were treated with standard balloon (PTA) (Nanocross, Medtronic, USA). The one-year patency rates were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the procedure and followed by Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) measurements and Rutherford classification. Results: Eighty three female and 113 male patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 63.56±11.21. The median Rutherford classification was 4 (3-5) in the drug-eluting group according to the Rutherford classification and 4 (3-5) in the naked balloon group. During the 12-month follow-up period, limb salvage rate was 82.0% (n=82) in drug-eluting balloons and this rate was found to be 65.6% (n=63) in naked balloon group. In terms of amputation rates, the drug-eluting balloon group was found to be statistically superior (p=0.009). Conclusion: In this study, 12-month patency rates were found to be superior to naked balloons at 12-month patency rates and clinical follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this study we aimed to evaluate the results of pathology that patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy with suspected appendicitis from August 2012 to August 2014. Material and Method: In this study data from 131 patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy between August 2012 and August 2014 in Van Training and Research Hospital were examined retrospectively for demographic characteristics. Results: In the laparoscopic appendectomy group handmade endoloop technique was used for closing the base of the appendix. Mc Burney's incision was used for open appendectomy. 47% of patients was female (n=61), 53% of patients were male (n=69). The average age of the patients was 27.7 years. According to surgical technique, open appendectomy was performed 15% (n=20), laparoscopic appendectomy was performed 85% (n=110). Postoperative drainage tube was put to 15% of patients (n=20). Wound infection was seen in 4 open appendectomy performed patients (20%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 days vs 2.8 days). When the pathology results are analyzed, 2 malignancies are revealed (1,5%), 1 carcinoid tumor, 1 neuroendocrine tumor. After pathology results hemicolectomy was performed. Conclusion: Appendectomy is the most frequently performed surgery, even if macroscopic pathology is not present the risk of malignancy can not be underestimated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]