Search

The dependency of the N200 amplitude of the motion-onset VEP evoked by a parafoveal grating of variable speed (0.25-13.5 deg/s, corresponding to 0.5-27 Hz) and constant contrast (4%) was studied. Additional measurements were made with parafoveally presented gratings of constant speed (2 deg/s, corresponding to 4 Hz) and a variable contrast (0.5-64%) before and after adaptation to a stationary or drifting grating. In this latter experiment, simultaneous psychophysical measurements were made of the perceived speed. The amplitude of the N200 wave increased with increasing stimulus speed within the slow speed range up to 1.5 deg/s (corresponding to 3 Hz). Adaptation to a stationary grating had no significant effect on the relationship between the N200 amplitude and stimulus contrast. Contrary to this, adaptation to a slowly drifting grating (1 deg/s, corresponding to 2 Hz) or to a rapidly drifting grating (4 deg/s, corresponding to 8 Hz) reduced the N200 amplitude significantly. Adaptation to a stationary grating slightly reduced the perceived speed of subsequently viewed gratings. Adaptation to a slowly drifting grating increased the perceived speed of the subsequently viewed gratings, whereas adaptation to a rapidly drifting grating decreased the perceived speed. The findings can be best explained by a two-channel model of speed perception. While the motion VEP reflects the sum of both channel activities, the psychophysical measures point to the antagonistic encoding of low and high velocities.

The contrast response functions (CRF) of pattern-appearance and motion-onset VEPs for periodic stimuli (gratings) were compared. The CRF for pattern-appearance is accelerative for the P100 component and compressive for the N200 component. Contrary to these results, the CRF for motion-onset shows an almost negligible slope for both components within the contrast range tested (0.5-64%). To better isolate the neural contributions to these different VEP components, we studied the effects of prior adaptation to stationary and moving gratings. Adaptation to stationary gratings has no effect on both VEP components for motion-onset and the P100 component for pattern-appearance, but did reduce the amplitude of the N200 for pattern-appearance. Adaptation to slow (1 deg/s) and fast (4 deg/s) gratings left the P100 amplitudes unaltered, while it significantly reduced the N200 amplitudes for both pattern-appearance and motion-onset. These results suggest that the N200 component of the motion-onset VEP is generated by motion-dependent neurons, whereas the same component for pattern-appearance arises from contrast-dependent neurons. The observed differences between P100 and N200 components appear to reflect the activity of both transient and sustained neural mechanisms.

We studied amplitude of the wave N200 of the motion-onset VEP by varying the side length of a square stimulation field between 0.5 and 7 degrees. A significant increase in amplitude was obtained between 0.5 and 1 degree of side length in central stimulation and between 0.5 and 5 degrees in 10-degree peripheral stimulation. Variations of spatial frequency between 0.34 and 6.8 c/deg did not modify the amplitude size, ie, no tuning effect could be found. The results of simultaneous and separate stimulation of foveal and parafoveal regions support the observation that the stimulation field size is a minor influence. Features of motion-sensitive cortical neurons, such as those found in monkeys, could account for this behavior.