Search

Neutrophilia is a potential biomarker for postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes. There is a paucity of data regarding neutrophilia in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Our Institutional Database was queried for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent esophagectomy from 2006 to 2019. Complete blood counts (CBC), demographic characteristics, perioperative and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. Two groups were created based on the presence of prolonged neutrophilia (PN, >7,000 absolute neutrophils 90 days after surgery). Univariate, multivariable, and survival analysis were performed (P-value

While preoperative tobacco cessation has been associated with decreased pulmonary complications in lung cancer patients in the postoperative period, this relationship has not been explored among patients undergoing esophagectomy in this era of increasingly prevalent tobacco cessation campaigns and enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods We reviewed ever-smokers who underwent esophagectomy at a single institution from January 2004 through June 2019 for esophageal cancer. Occurrence of Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3 major postoperative morbidity (MPM), including anastomotic leak, chylothorax, reoperation, organ dysfunction, respiratory failure, and ICU readmission was calculated. In an effort to evaluate an effect of smoking cessation on outcome, never-smokers were excluded from analyses. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards stepwise elimination was completed to determine the optimal cessation interval associated with reduction in MPM. Robust standard errors were used to account for clustering among surgeons. Results 725 patients met inclusion criteria, including 666 (92%) with adenocarcinoma and a smaller proportion with squamous cell carcinoma. Most patients were male (650, 90%), and the median age was 63 years (IQR 57–69). Records showed that 505 patients (60%) had quit >5 years prior to esophagectomy, and 82 (11%) were current smokers or had quit within the month preceding esophagectomy. MPM occurred in 213 (29%). After univariate regression, age, gender, pack-year history, operative duration, and FEV1 were included in a multivariable model. While age remained associated wtih MPM, preoperative tobacco cessation of any interval was not associated with outcomes. Conclusion Our previous publication showed increased complication risk for smokers undergoing esophagectomy compared to non-smokers. However, among ever-smokers, no specific interval of preoperative cessation demonstrated decreased MPM. In a setting of active tobacco cessation programs, patients who have not completely achieved abstinence may still be offered surgery with equivalent perioperative outcomes.

Most patients undergoing esophagectomy will experience intermittent reflux of gastric and biliary content into the remnant esophagus over the course of their lives. The incidence of new or recurrent intestinal metaplasia (IM) following chemoradiation and surgery has not been well-described. Furthermore, post-resection guidelines do not exist regarding surveillance for IM in the esophageal remnant. We hypothesized that the incidence of IM in patients who underwent active post-treatment surveillance would be low. Methods Patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after concurrent chemoradiation for a diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 2006–2018 were identified. Pathology records were reviewed for the presence of IM on pretreatment biopsies, surgical specimen, or post-resection biopsies. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate, and continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results 621 patients were included, and 242 (39%) were known to have had IM prior to esophagectomy. An additional 26 (4%) patients without a preexisting diagnosis of IM were found to have IM in the surgical specimen. During a median follow-up of 62 months, development of new IM was rare, occurring only in 12 (2%) patients, 7 of whom had a prior history of IM(Table); incidence was 0.6 cases per patient-years. Of these 12, 3 (25%) developed local adenocarcinoma recurrence. Overall, local recurrence of adenocarcinoma was uncommon, and occurred at similar rates in patients with and without a history of IM(p = 0.774). Conclusion Despite several factors predisposing to mucosal damage following esophagectomy, occurrence of new IM after trimodality therapy in our patient population appears to be rare, even among patient with a previous history of metaplasia.

High body mass index (H-BMI; ≥25 kg/m(2) ) is common in US adults. In a small cohort of esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with surgery, H-BMI and diagnosis of early stage EC appeared associated. We evaluated a much larger cohort of EC patients. From a prospectively maintained database, we analyzed 925 EC patients who had surgery with or without adjunctive therapy. Various statistical methods were used. Among 925 patients, 69% had H-BMI, and 31% had normal body mass index (

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is used with hope to decrease the morbidity associated with an open esophagectomy. Reflux and dumping syndromes are the most important functional complaints in patients after esophagectomy. This study compares the functional benefits of MIE with open esophagectomy. The study enrolled patients who underwent either minimally invasive or open esophagectomy for cancer between 2004 and 2009. No patients in the MIE group had a pyloroplasty or myotomy. Each patient in the MIE group was paired to a patient in the open esophagectomy group via propensity matching. Matching variables included age, race, gender, preoperative treatment, history of prior cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists Risk Scale, performance status, clinical stage, body mass index, histology, level of anastomosis, and time elapsed since surgery. The patients were asked to answer 26 questions about their reflux and dumping using validated questionnaires. A total of 181 patients were included in the study. From this group, 44 pairs of patients were created and used for the analysis. The median follow-up was 12.1 months for the MIE group and 18.3 months for the open group. The reflux score was slightly worse in the MIE group (5.5 versus 3.5, P= 0.021). There was no difference in the dumping symptoms between the two groups. The most common complaints seen in the dumping questionnaire in almost one-third of all patients were early satiety, abdominal discomfort, nausea, and diarrhea. Of the patients, 77% were satisfied or very satisfied with their condition in the MIE group compared with 93% in the open group (P= 0.287). Reflux, dumping, and overall satisfaction after MIE without pyloroplasty are comparable with those obtained after open esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure.

It remains unclear whether the overall survival (OS) of patients with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma (LEA) with Barrett's esophagus (BE) (Barrett's-positive) and those with LEA without BE (Barrett's-negative) following preoperative chemoradiation is different. Based on the published differences in the molecular biology of the two entities, we hypothesized that the two groups will have a different clinical biology (and OS). In this retrospective analysis, all patients with LEA had surgery following preoperative chemoradiation. Apart from age, gender, baseline clinical stage, location, class of cytotoxics, post-therapy stage, and OS, LEAs were divided up into Barrett's-positive and Barrett's-negative groups based on histologic documentation of BE. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analytic methods were used. We analyzed 362 patients with LEA (137 Barrett's-positive and 225 Barrett's-negative). A higher proportion of Barrett's-positive patients had (EUS)T2 cancers (27%) than those with Barrett's-negative cancer (17%). More Barrett's-negative LEAs involved gastroesophageal junction than Barrett's-positive ones (P = 0.001). The OS was significantly shorter for Barrett's-positive patients than that for Barrett's-negative patients (32 months vs. 51 months; P = 0.04). In a multivariate analysis for OS, Barrett's-positive LEA (P = 0.006), old age (P = 0.016), baseline positive nodes (P = 0.005), more than 2 positive (yp)N (P = 0.0001), higher (yp)T (P = 0.003), and the use of a taxane (0.04) were the independent prognosticators. Our data demonstrate that the clinical biology (reflected in OS) is less favorable for patients with Barrett's-positive LEA than for patients with Barrett's-negative LEA. Our intriguing findings need confirmation followed by in-depth molecular study to explain these differences.