Search

Rectoanal intussusception may cause symptoms of obstructed defecation, and functional results of prosthesis rectopexy are usually not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to assess several parameters of the disorder and to evaluate the outcome of resection rectopexy. During a 10-year period, 27 female patients with symptomatic large rectoanal intussusception had resection rectopexy (23 laparoscopy; 4 laparotomy). Conservative treatment, including biofeedback treatment in 22 patients, had failed in all cases. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included clinical assessment, anorectal manometry, evacuation defecography, and colon transit studies. Follow-up ranged between one and five years. Length of intussusception was 2 to 4.9 cm and was significantly related to pelvic floor descent (P = 0.003) and inversely related to resting anal pressures (P < 0.001). Eleven patients had undergone a previous hysterectomy, 9 had enterocele-sigmoidocele, 7 had incontinence of varying severity, and 8 had a solitary rectal ulcer. Colon transit was abnormal in all but five cases. Immediate functional results were bad in two-thirds of the cases; tenesmus, urge to defecate, and frequent stools were the main complaints. By the time these symptoms had subsided, and one year after surgery, all but two patients were satisfied with the outcome. Intussusception was reduced in all cases, anal sphincter tone recovered (P = 0.002), perineal descent decreased (P < 0.001), and colonic transit was accelerated (P < 0.001). Patients available at five-year follow-up had no or only minor defecatory problems. Resection rectopexy improves symptoms of obstructed defecation attributed to large rectoanal intussusception.

The aim of this study was to investigate any possible relation between the severity of anorectal dysfunction in diabetes mellitus and duration of disease and presence of microangiopathy or neuropathy or both.Standard multiport anorectal manometry was performed in 25 healthy control subjects (10 males; age (mean +/- 1 standard deviation), 62 +/- 14 years) and 38 patients with diabetes mellitus. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of the disease: Group A (19 patients) with a duration less than 10 years (7.2 +/- 2.5; 8 males; age, 57 +/- 18) and Group B (19 patients) with a duration longer than 10 years (19.8 +/- 5.6; 6 males; age, 62 +/- 15).Results are reported as mean +/- one standard deviation. Patients showed lower resting and squeeze anal pressures (P0.01), impaired rectoanal inhibitory and anocutaneous reflexes, and reduced sensitivity in rectal distention (P = 0.004) as compared with controls. In addition, Group B showed a significantly increased incidence of microangiopathy (P = 0.04) and autonomic and peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.002), significantly reduced basal and squeeze anal pressures (52 +/- 16 vs. 64 +/- 24 mmHg; P = 0.03 and 98 +/- 39 vs. 124 +/- 54 mmHg; P = 0.04, respectively), reduced amplitude of slow waves (7.3 +/- 3 ts. 9.5 +/- 3.7 mmHg; P = 0.03), anal leak in smaller rectal volumes (P = 0.003), and reduced response of the anal sphincter at the anocutaneous reflexes (29 +/- 14 vs. 39 +/- 14 mmHg; P = 0.05) compared with Group A. The former group of patients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of fecal incontinence (P = 0.008).Patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus have increased incidence of fecal incontinence and severely impaired function of both the anal sphincters and the rectum. These findings could be attributed to the increased incidence of microangiopathy and autonomic and peripheral neuropathy observed in this subset of diabetic patients.

PURPOSE: Based on the rationale that the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, decreases lower esophageal sphincter pressure in achalasia, a prospective controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effect of sublingual nifedipine on the anal sphincter of controls and patients with high anal resting pressures. METHODS: Ten age-matched and sex-matched controls without evidence of anal disorder and ten patients with hemorrhoids and/or fissure-in-ano were included in the study. Anorectal manometry, with an eight-channel, water-perfused catheter was performed on all patients before and 30 minutes after administration of 20 mg of sublingual nifedipine. RESULTS: Nifedipine significantly reduced anal resting pressure in both controls and patients by approximately 30 percent (P