Search

Abstract: Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of a standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy on the short-term outcome of patients with neoplasia. Methods: Consecutive patients with histologically proven right colon neoplasia underwent a standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy with medial to lateral approach encompassing ten sequential steps: 1) ligation of ileocolic vessels, 2) identification of right ureter, 3) dissection along superior mesenteric vein, 4) division of omentum, 5) division of right branch of middle colic vessels, 6) transection of transverse colon, 7) mobilization of right colon, 8) transection of terminal ileum, 9) ileocolic anastomosis, 10) delivery of specimen. Values were medians (ranges). Results: From July 2002 to June 2005, 111 laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomies were attempted with a 5.4 percent conversion rate. There were 57 women and 54 men, aged 64.9 (range, 40–85) years, with body mass index of 33 (range, 20–43), American Society of Anesthesiology score of 2 (range, 2–4), 36.9 percent comorbidities, and 37.8 percent previous abdominal surgery. The indication for surgery was cancer in 109 patients. Operative time was 120 (range, 80–185) minutes. Estimated blood loss was 69 (range, 50–600) ml. Overall length of skin incisions was 66 (range, 60–66) mm; 29 (range, 2–41) lymph nodes were harvested. Length of stay was four (range, 2–30) days. Complication rate was 4.5 percent. Conclusions: A standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy resulted in a favorable short-term outcome in unselected patients with neoplasia of the right colon.

Abstract: Purpose: This study was performed to compare open Hartmann’s reversal to laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal with regard to complication, readmission, and reoperation rates. Methods: Data of patients who underwent open Hartmann’s reversal or laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal between 1998 and 2004 at two institutions were collected. End points were complications in the hospital or after discharge, readmission to the hospital, and reoperation within 6 months after initial surgery. Results: Sixty-one open Hartmann’s reversal and 61 laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal patients were well matched except for American Society of Anesthesiology grade (1.9 vs. 1.6; P = 0.008), timing of Hartmann’s procedure (14 vs. 6 months; P = 0.001), operation time (210 vs. 154 minutes; P = 0.001), and estimated blood loss (363 vs. 254ml; P = 0.01). Thirty-day complication rates did not differ (18 vs. 13 percent). At 6 month follow-up, open Hartmann’s reversal patients had increased complication (16.4 vs. 3.3 percent; P = 0.015) and reoperation (13.1 vs. 3.3 percent; P = 0.048) rates but the same readmission rates (16.4 percent). Conclusions: Compared with open Hartmann’s reversal, 6 month complication and reoperation rates were lower in laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal patients. Most of the six-month complications and reoperations in open Hartmann’s reversal were abdominal wall-related. Readmission rates were similar, but reasons for readmission were surgical in open Hartmann’s reversal and medical in laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal.